Browse > Article

Developing of a Criterion for Selecting and Producing of Performance  

Kim, Eun-Jin (Pusan National University of Education)
Park, Hyun-Ju (Chosun University)
Kang, Ho-Kam (Inchon National University of Education)
Noh, Suk-Gu (Inchon National University of Education)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.23, no.1, 2003 , pp. 75-85 More about this Journal
Abstract
We have developed of a criterion that would help to select and develop performance assessments in science education. There are six categories of a criterion: Fidelity, satisfaction, content validity, fairness & suitability, reliability & objectivity, and usability. There are the total of 25 sub-categories under the six categories. Five science educators evaluated the validity of the criterion. For reliability of the criterion, Kendall's tau-b was used. Eight science educators and elementary teachers evaluated three performance assessment tasks for the correspondence of the criterion. This study also discuss the implications of this criterion as well.
Keywords
performance assessment; criterion of selecting assessment tool fidelity; satisfaction;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 강인애(1997), 왜 구성주의인가?, 문음사
2 Bransford, J. D. & Stein. B. S.(1984), The ideal problem solver: A guide for improving thinking, learning, and creativity. W. H. Freeman: NY.
3 Brown, A. L., Bransford. J. D., Ferrara. R. A., & Campione, J. C.(1983). Learning, remem-bering. and understanding, In J.H. Flavell and M. Markman (Eds.), Cognitive Development, Wiley: New York, 3, 77-166
4 Glaser. R. & Pellegrino, J. W.(1987), Aptitudes for learning and cognitive processes. In F. Weinert & R Kluwe(Eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hilsdale, NJ. 267-288
5 Kim, E. J., Park. H. J., Kang, H. K., & Noh, S. G.(2000). Developing a framework for science performance assessment. Paper presented at 2000 NARST conference in New Orleans, LA.
6 Larkin, J. H.(1989), What knowledge transfers? In L.B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser. Hilsdale. NJ: Eribaum, 283-305
7 Resnick, L. B. & Klopfer. L. E.(1989). Toward the thinking curriculum: An overview. In Resnick, L. B. & Klopfer, L. E.(Eds.), Toward the thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research. 1989 yearbook of Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, ASCD: Alexandria, VA.
8 김영채 역(1993), 학습심리학, 박영사
9 Hart. D.(1994). Authentic Assessment: A Handbook for Educators. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company
10 정종진(1999). 학교학습의 극대화를 위한 교육평가의 이해. 양서원
11 Tarmir, P.(1998). Assessment & Evaluation in Science Education: Opportunities to learn & outcomes. In B. J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (ed). International Handbook of Science Education (Part 2). Kluwer Academic Publishers
12 황정규(1998). 학교학습과 교육평가. 교육과학사
13 Herman, J. L., Aschbacher, P. R., & Winters, L.(1992), A practical guide to alternative assessment, Selecting Assessment Tasks. U.S.A : University of California
14 남명호(1995). 수행평가와 타당성 연구, 고려대학교 박사학위논문
15 Brown, J. H., & Shavelson, R. J.(1996). Assessing hands-on science: A teachers' guide to performance assessment. Sage Publication Company: CA.
16 Baron. J.(1991). Performance assessment: Blurring the edge of assessment. curriculum and instruction. In G. Kulm & S. Malcom (Eds.), Science assessment in the service of reform. American Association for the Advancement of Science: Washington, D. C., 247-266
17 김영순(1998), 초등학교 자연과 수행평가에 대한 문화기술적 연구, 한국교원대학교 석사학위논문
18 Glaser. R.(1984). Educating and thinking: The role of knowledge. American Psychologist, 39, 93-104   DOI
19 Linn. R. L., Baker, E, L., & Dunbar, S. B. (1991). Complex, performance - based assessment: Expectations and validation criteria. Educational Researcher, November. 15-21
20 Solano-Flores, G., Shavelson. R. J., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Schultz. S. E., Wiley, E. W., Brown, J., H.,(1997). On the development and scoring of classification and observation science performance assessments. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the AERA. Chicago, IL, April 24-28, 1997, ED 411 314
21 전성연, 최병역 역(1998), 학습 동기, 학지사
22 임영득, 조혜경, 한안진, 박현주, 송민영, 김은진, 홍석인, 강호감, 노석구(2001). 초등학생의 자연과 수행평가실태조사 및 초등학교 자연과 수행평가도구의 개발 II. 한국과학교육학회지, 21(2), 459-472
23 임영득, 조혜경, 한안진, 박현주, 송민영, 김은진, 홍석인, 강호감, 노석구 (1999), 초등학생의 자연과 수행평가실태조사 및 초등학교 자연과 수행평가도구의 개발, 초등과학교육, 18(1), 41-51
24 김은진(2000). 과학 교과 수행평가틀의 개발. 서울대학교 박사학위 논문