Browse > Article

The Effect of Grouping by Extraversion and Introversion in Paired Think-Aloud Problem Solving Using Problem-Solving Strategy  

Jeon, Kyung-Moon (Seoul National University)
Kang, Hun-Sik (Seoul National University)
Noh, Tae-Hee (Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.23, no.1, 2003 , pp. 57-65 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this study, the effects of grouping by extraversion and introversion in paired think-aloud problem solving using a four-stage problem-solving strategy emphasizing planning and checking stages were investigated. Prior to the instructions, the students' extraversion/introversion in three high school classes (N=87) were examined, and those classes were randomly assigned to the homogeneous, the heterogeneous, and the control groups. The test scores of the two treatment groups were significantly higher than those of the control group in the problem-solving ability. However, there were no significant differences in learning difficulty and self-efficacy. Although there were no significant differences between the scores of two treatment groups in the subcategories of the perception of treatment, the test scores of extroverts were significantly higher than those of introverts in the perception of performing listener's role, the preference to problem solving strategy, and the preference to paired think-aloud problem solving.
Keywords
problem-solving strategy; planning; checking; paired think-aloud problem solving; extraversion; introversion;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Dorman, N. H. (1990). The effects of a problem -solving course on secondary school students' analytical skills, reasoning ability and scholastic aptitude. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Maryland College Park
2 Kichuk, S. L. & Wiesner, W. H.(1997). The big five personality factors and team performance: implications for selecting successful product design teams. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 14, 195-221   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Lochhead, J. & Whimbey, A(1987). Teaching analytical reasoning through thinking aloud pair provlem solving. In J. E. Stice (Ed.), Developing critical thinking and problem-solving abilities. Jossey- Bass: San Francisco, 73-92
4 Nattiv, A.(1994), Helping behaviors and math achievement gain of students using cooperative learning. The Elementary School Journal, 94(3), 285-297   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Woods, D. R.(1989). Problem solving in practice. In. D. L. Gabel (Ed.), What research says to the science teacher: Problem solving. National Science Teachers Association: Washington, DC. 97-121
6 노태희, 전경문(1997b). 중학생의 화학 문제 해결 전략 조사. 한국과학교육학회지, 17(1), 75-83
7 노태희, 정영선, 강석진, 유지연(2002), 해결자 . 청취자 활동과 몰 지도를 사용한 문제 해결 교수 방법의 효과. 한국과학교육학회지, 22(1), 102-109
8 노태희, 한재영, 서인호, 전경문, 차정호(2000). 학생의 내 . 외향성에 따른 협동학습의 효과. 한국과학교육학회지, 20(1), 43-51
9 Neuman, G. A, Wagner, S. H., & Christiansen, N. D.(1999). The relationship between work-team personality composition and the job performance of teams. Group & Organlzation Management, 24(1), 28-45   DOI
10 Fraser, B. J. & Fisher, D. L.(1986). Using short forms of classroom climate instruments to assess and improve classroom psychosocial environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(5), 387-413   DOI
11 Webb, N. M.(1982). Group composition, group interaction and achievement in cooperative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(4), 475-484   DOI
12 노태희, 서인호, 한재영, 전경문, 차정호(2000). 협동학습에서 학생의 의사소통 불안에 따른 소잡단 구성의 효과. 한국교육학회지, 20(1), 174-182
13 노태희, 정영선, 김창민, 강석진(2001). 계획과 검토 단계를 강조한 문제 해결 전략과 해결자 . 청취자 활동의 교수 효과. 한국과학교육학회지. 21(4), 738-744
14 노태희, 전경문, 한인옥, 김창민(1996). 학생의 인지발달 수준과 문제의 상황에 따른 화학 문제 해결 행동 비교. 한국과학교육학회지, 16(4), 389-400
15 Huffman, D.(1997). Effect of explicit problem solving instruction on high school students' problem -solving performance and conceptual understanding of physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(6), 551-570   DOI   ScienceOn
16 교육부 (1997). 과학과 교육과정. 서울: 대한교과서 주식회사
17 Matthews, G.(1997), Extraversion, emotion and performance: A cognitive-adaptive model. In G. Matthews (Ed.), Cognitive science perspectives on personality and emotion. Elservier Science: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 300-442
18 Jonassen, D. H. & Grabowski, B. L.(1993). Handbook of individual differences, learning, and instruction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: New Jersey
19 Pintrich. P. R. & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40   DOI
20 Paiares, F. & Miller, D.(1997). Mathematics self-efficacy and mathematical problem solving: Implication of using different forms of assessment. Journal of Experimental Education, 65(3), 213-228   DOI   ScienceOn
21 노태희, 박수연. 임희준, 차정호(1998), 협동학습 전략에서 소집단 구성 방법의 효과. 한국과학교육학회지, 18(1), 61-82   과학기술학회마을
22 노태희, 전경문(1997a). 물질의 분자 수준을 시각적으로 강조하는 4단계 문제 해결식 수업이 학생의 개념과 문제 해결 능력에 미치는 효과. 한국과학교육학회지, 17(3). 313-321
23 Goldberg, L. R.(1999). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. J. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf(Eds.), Personality Psychology in Europe (Vol. 7). Tilburg University Press: Tilburg, The Netherlands, 7-28. Available: http://ipip.ori.org.
24 전경문, 노태희(2001). 문제 해결 전략과 해결자 . 청취자 활동이 고등학생의 화학 문제 해결에 미치는 효과. 한국과학교육학회지, 21(2), 289-298