1 |
Osborne, R.(1983). Towards modifying children's ideas about electric current. Research in Science and Technological Education, 1, 73-82
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Shipstone, D.(1988). Pupil's understanding of simple electrical circuits. Physics Education, 23, 92-96
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Shipstone, D.(1984). A study of children's understanding of electricity in simple DC circuits. European Journal of Science Education, 6, 185-198
DOI
|
4 |
Zietman, A., & Hewson, P.(1986). Effect of instruction using microcomputer simulations and conceptual change strategies on science learning, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, 27-39
DOI
|
5 |
Shepardson, D., & Moje, E.(1994). The nature of fourth graders' understandings of electric circuits. Science Education, 78,489-514
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Fredette, N., & Lochhead, J.(1980). Students' conceptions of simple circuits. The Physics Teacher, 18, 194-198
DOI
|
7 |
Chambers, S., & Andre, T.(1997). Gender, prior knowledge, interest, and experience in electricity and conceptual change text manipulations in learning about direct current. Journal of Research in Science teaching, 34, 107-123
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Driver, R., & Be11(1986). Students thinking and the learning of science: A constructivist view. School Science Review, 67, 443-456
|
9 |
Kim, E., Shim, J., Jung, Y., & Chang B.(1999). Analysis and suggestions for elementary textbooks based on the elementary students' understanding of electric circuits. Journal ofthe Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 19, 570-584
|
10 |
Kim, H., Kim, K., & Kim, S.(1992). The children's conceptions about electricity and the effect of intervention. Journal of Etementary Science Education, 11,123-139
|
11 |
White, R., & Gunstone, R.(1992). Prob'ms understanding. Falmer: London
|
12 |
Osborne, R.(1985). Building on children's intuitive ideas. In R. Osbome and P. Freyberg (Eds.), Learning in Science: The imptications of chiIdren's science (Ch. 4). Heinemann: Auckland
|
13 |
Anderson, C., & Smith, E.(1987). Teaching science, In V. Richardson-Koehler (Ed.), Educator's handbook: A research perspective. Longman: New York, 84-111
|
14 |
Champagne, A., Gunstone, R., & Klopfer, L.(1985). Instructional consequences of students knowledge about physical phenomena, In L.H.T. West and A.L. Pines (Eds.), Cognitive structure and conceptual change. Academic: Orlando, FL, 61-90
|
15 |
Fredette, N., & Clement, J.(1981). Student misconceptions of an electric circuit: What do they mean? Journal of Cottege Science Teaching, 11, 280-285
|
16 |
Strike, K., & Posner, G.(1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change, In R.A. Duschl & R. J. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice. State University of New York Press: Albany, NY, 147-176
|
17 |
Ministry of Education of Korea.(1996). The teacher's guide - 3rd erade 2nd semester, 134-161
|
18 |
Wandersee, J., Mintzes, J., & Novak, J. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D.L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and teaming. MacMillan: New York, 177-210
|
19 |
Cosgrove, M.(1995). A study of science-in-the-making as students generate an analogy for electricity, International Journal of Science Education, 17, 295-310
DOI
ScienceOn
|
20 |
Driver, R., & Easley, J.(1978). Pupils and paradigms: A review of the literature related to concept development in adolescent science students. Studies in Science Education, 6, 61-84
|