Browse > Article

The Comparative Analysis of Science Process Skills and Teaching Methods in the 6th and the 7th Elementary School Science Curricula  

Choi, Sun-Young (Inchon Ilsin Elementary School)
Kang, Ho-Kam (Inchon National Univ. of Education)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.22, no.4, 2002 , pp. 706-716 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare and analyze the science process skills and teaching methods between the 6th and the 7th elementary school science textbooks. For this study, science textbooks and teacher's guidebooks from the 3rd to the 6th grade were analyzed. In this research the science process skills are divided by basic process skills(BPS) and integrated process skills(IPS). The BPS is composed of observing, classifying, measuring, predicting and inferring skill, which are 5 subcategories. The IPS is composed of problem cognition, formulating hypothesis, controlling variables, transforming data, interpreting data, drawing result, and generalization, which are 7 subcategories. The results found in the analysis of science process skills in the 6th and 7th science textbooks are as follows: 1. The percentage of the BPS was increased, but the IPS was decreased in the 7th than the 6th. 2. The percentage of the IPS was higher than the BPS in the 6th science textbooks, but the BPS was higher than IPS in lower grade and the IPS was higher than the BPS in higher grade in the 7th textbooks. 3. Observing and problem cognition skill were most dominant in the 6th and 7th science textbooks. 4. The percentages of observing(24.8%), classifying(5.4%), measuring(5.6%), inferring(6.0%) in the BPS and interpreting data(4.4%) in the IPS were increased, but predicting(3.8%), formulating hypothesis(0.5%), controlling variables( 1.8%), transforming data( 1.2%), drawing result(0.8%) and generalization(0.9%) skills were decreased in the 7th. And teaching methods suggested in the curriculum are as follows: the percentages of learning by observation(19.2%) and role play(0.1 %) were decreased, but learning by experiment(6.2%), learning by discussion(2.0%), learning by investigation(4.6%) and creative learning(6,4%) were increased in the 7th than the 6th. In conclusion, it was found that the basic process skills were emphasized in the 7th science textbooks than the 6th and the science process skills in the science textbooks of the 7th curriculum were distributed by the grade level of the elementary children.
Keywords
science process skills; teaching methods; curriculum;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 남철우, 김석중(1998). 통합과학교육론. 학문사: 서울
2 교육부(1998). 제7차 과학과 교육과정. (주)대한교과서: 서울
3 김진철 외 10명(2000). 수업 길라잡이. 서울. 학문사
4 김효남(1988). 국민학교 과학내용의 분석과 발전적 모색. 한국과학교육학회지. 8(2), 23-32   과학기술학회마을   ScienceOn
5 박승재(1994). 과학교육. 교육과학사: 서울
6 교육부(1997a). 초등학교 3, 4, 5, 6학년 자연 교과서. (주)국정교과서: 충남
7 교육부(1997b). 초등학교 3, 4, 5, 6학년 자연 교사용 지도서. (주)국정교과서: 충남
8 장남기, 임영득, 강호감, 김영수, 김희백(1994). 탐구과학교육론. 교육과학사: 서울
9 우종옥, 이항로, 이경훈(1991). 대학 수학능력 시험의 수리. 탐구 영역중 지구과학 교과에 관련된 탐구능력 측정을 위한 행동 요소의 추출과 평가 목표의 상세화 연구 I. 한국과학교육학회지, 11(1), 83-96
10 구수정, 김영신, 김병석, 이성조, 정완호(2000). 생물학적 소양의 함양을 위한 BSCS 통합 권고안과 제6차, 제7차 교육과정 비교. 한국과학교육학회지, 20(3), 396-410
11 교육부(2001b). 초등학교 3, 4, 5, 6학년 과학 교사용 지도서. (주)대한교과서: 서울
12 김진용, 정완호, 허명(1993). 한국의 국민학교 자연 교과서와 SCIIS의 탐구 활동 비교분석. 한국과학교육회지, 13(1), 56-65
13 조정일(1989). 초. 중. 고등학교 과학교과서에 대한 탐구과제 분석과 탐구내용 분석-생물내용을 중심으로. 생물교육학회지, 17(2), 17-26
14 Klopfer, W. W.(1971). Evaluation of Learning in Science. In Bloom, B., Hastings, J. & Madaus, G. (Eds.). Handbook of Formative and Summative Evaluation of Student Learning. New York : MacGraw-Hill
15 우종옥, 정완호, 권재술, 최병순, 정진우, 허명(1992). 초등학교 자연 교과서 개발체제 분석 및 평가 연구. 한국과학교육학회지, 12(2), 109-128
16 김효남, 이영미(1995). 한국과 일본 5학년 과학 교과서 내용 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 15(4), 452-458   과학기술학회마을   ScienceOn
17 한안진(1987). 현대탐구과학교육. 교육과학사: 서울
18 APU(1984). Science in School, Age 15, Report No. 1. Center for Studies in Science Education. The University of Leeds
19 교육부(2001a). 초등학교 3, 4, 5, 6학년 과학 교과서. (주)대한교과서: 서울
20 허명(1984). 과학탐구 평가표의 개발. 한국과학교육학회지, 4(1), 57-63