Browse > Article

Analyzing Characteristics of Design-Build Delivery System in Korea Using System Dynamics Modeling  

Lee, Hyun-Soo (서울대학교 건축학과)
Ji, Sae-Hyun (서울대학교 건축학과)
Park, Moon-Seo (서울대학교 건축학과)
Song, Sang-Hun (대한주택공사)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management / v.8, no.5, 2007 , pp. 119-131 More about this Journal
Abstract
Design build (DB) is a construction project delivery system which has become one of the favored ones and the growth of DB by the public agencies has been steadily increasing. DB can be viewed as an evolutionary project delivery system, since DB project team members collaborate on work with each other, keep seeking cost effective and innovative alternatives that meet the construction needs of the project. Thus DB outperformed others in delivery speed, cost saving, and turnover quality. In Korea, DB projects likewise have steadily increased that it is needed to analyze characteristics of DB delivery system in Korea. For that purpose, this research would offer an analysis of characteristics of DB delivery system in Korea using system dynamics model with investigating the public market trend, comparing DB performance to DBB, and analyzing questionnaire survey.
Keywords
Delivery system; Design-Build; System Dynamics; Performance Analysis; Turn-Key;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 대한건설협회(2000-2006). 건설백서
2 김해곤 외 (2006). '공공부문 일괄입찰사업의 설계VE 파트너링 활용방안', 한국건설관리학회논문집 제 7권 제1호, 한국건설관리학회, pp.110-119   과학기술학회마을
3 서용칠 (2003). 대형공사 발주방식 선정방법, 제 13회 CM Forum
4 이양규, 강인석 (2004). '설계 . 시공일괄입찰제도의 수주현황 사례분석', 한국건설관리학회 학술발표대회 논문집 제5회, 한국건설관리학회, pp.197-202
5 한국건설기술연구원 (2001). 턴키제도의 시행성과와 방기발전 전략연구, 건설교통부, pp. 29-32
6 Miller B. J. et al, (2000). 'Toward a New Paradigm: Simultaneous Use of Multiple Project Delivery Method', Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 16(3), ASCE, pp.58-67
7 Ibbs C. W. et al. (2003). 'Project Delivery System and Project Change: Quantitative Analysis', Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(4), ASCE, pp.382-387   DOI   ScienceOn
8 이상호 (2006). 턴키제도의 선진화를 위한 개선방안, 한국건설산업연구원
9 Oyetunji A A et al. (2006). 'Relative Effectivenss of Project Delivery and Contract Strategies', Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(1), ASCE, pp. 3-13   DOI   ScienceOn
10 현창택 외 (2002). 대형공사 입찰방법이 건설공사에 미치는 영향 연구, 서울특별시
11 유정복 (2006). 건교부 종합국정감사 질의서
12 Konchar M. and Sanvido V. (1998). 'Comparison of U. S. Project Delivery system', Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 124(6), ASCE. pp. 435-444   DOI
13 박채규 (2006). 우리나라 건설환경의 특수성(수주분석), 정부공사제도 연구포럼 제 4회 토론자료
14 김만철 (2003). '국내 공공부문 설계시공일괄 입찰방식의 낙찰자 선정방법 개선에 관한 연구', 대한건축학회 학술발표논문집 제 23권 제1호, 대한건축학회, pp.367-370
15 Christopher M. Gordon (1994). 'Choosing Appropriate Construction Contracting Method', Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 120(1), ASCE, pp.196-210   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Sidney M. Levy (2006). Design-build, McGrow Hill pp. 1, 7, 27
17 김선희 외 (2004). '국내 턴키/대안공사 실태조사를 통한 터니/대안 입찰제도의 성과분석', 한국건설관리학회 학술발표대회논문집 제5회, 한국건설관리학회, pp.462-467