Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2008.35.3.225

Immune Responses against Marek's Disease Virus Infection  

Jang, H.K. (Department of Infectious Diseases and Avian Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chonbuk National University)
Park, Y.M. (Department of Infectious Diseases and Avian Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chonbuk National University)
Cha, S.Y. (Department of Infectious Diseases and Avian Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chonbuk National University)
Park, J.B. (Department of Infectious Diseases and Avian Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chonbuk National University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Poultry Science / v.35, no.3, 2008 , pp. 225-240 More about this Journal
Abstract
Marek's disease virus(MDV) is a highly cell-associated, lymphotropic $\alpha$-herpesvirus that causes paralysis and neoplastic disease in chickens. The disease has been controlled by vaccination which was provided the first evidence for a malignant cancer being controlled by an antiviral vaccine. Marek's disease pathogenesis is complex, involving cytolytic and latent infection of lymphoid cells and oncogenic transformation of $CD4^+$ T cells in susceptible chickens. MDV targets a number of different cell types during its life cycle. Lymphocytes play an essential role, although within them virus production is restricted and only virion are produced. Innate and adaptive immune responses develop in response to infection, but infection of lymphocytes results in immunosuppressive effects. Hence in MDV-infected birds, MDV makes its host more vulnerable to tumour development as well as to other pathogens. All chickens are susceptible to MDV infection, and vaccination is essential to protect the susceptible host from developing clinical disease. Nevertheless, MDV infects and replicates in vaccinated chickens, with the challenge virus being shed from the feather-follicle epithelium. The outcome of infection with MDV depends on a complex interplay of factors involving the MDV pathotype and the host genotype. Host factors that influence the course of MD are predominantly the responses of the innate and adaptive immune systems, and these are modulated by: age at infection and maturity of the immune system; vaccination status; the sex of the host; and various physiological factors.
Keywords
Marek's disease virus; vaccine; pathogenesis; innate and adaptive immune responses;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Bumstead JM, Payne LN 1987 Production of an immune suppressor factor by Marek's disease lymphoblastoid cell lines. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 16:47-66   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Burgoyne GH, Witter RL 1973 Effect of passively transfered immunoglobulins on Marek's disease. Avian Dis. 17:824-837   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Buscaglia C, Calnek BW, Schat KA 1988b Effect of immunocompetence on the establishment and maintenance of latency with Marek's disease herpesvirus. J Gen Virol 69:1067-77   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Cerwenka A, Lanier LL 2001 Natural killer cells, viruses and cancer. Nat Rev Immunol 1:41-49   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Djeraba A, Musset E, Bernardet N, Le Vern Y, Quéré P 2002a Similar pattern of iNOS expression, NO production and cytokine response in genetic and vaccination-acquired resistance to Marek's disease. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 85: 63-75   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Djeraba A, Musset E, Lowenthal JW, Boyle DB, Chausse AM, Peloille M, Quere P 2002b Protective effect of avian myelomonocytic growth factor in infection with Marek's disease virus. J Virol 76:1062-1070   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Haffer K, Sevoian M, Wilder M 1979 The role of the macrophages in Marek's disease: in vitro and in vivo studies. Int J Cancer 23:648-656   DOI
8 Kaleta HD, Neumann U 1977 Investigations on the model of transmission of the herpesvirus of turkeys in vitro. Avian Pathol 6:33-39   DOI
9 Omar AR, Schat KA 1996 Syngeneic Marek's disease virus (MDV)-specific cell-mediated immune responses against immediate early, late, and unique MDV proteins. Virology 222: 87-99   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Payne LN, Frazier JA 1976 Powell PC pathogenesis of Marek's disease. Int Rev Exp Pathol. 16:59-154
11 Ross LJ 1977 Antiviral T cell-mediated immunity in Marek's disease. Nature 268:644-646   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Schat KA 1991 Importance of cell-mediated immunity in Marek's disease and other viral tumor diseases. Poult Sci 70: 1165-1175   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Sharma JM, Coulson BD 1979 Presence of natural killer cells in specific-pathogen-free chickens. J Natl Cancer Inst 63: 527-531
14 Van Zaane D, Brinkhof JM, Westenbrink F, Gielkens AL 1982 Molecular-biological characterization of Marek's disease virus. I. Identification of virus-specific polypeptides in infected cells. Virology 121:116-132   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Xing Z, Schat KA 2000b Expression of cytokine genes in Marek's disease virus-infected chickens and chicken embryo fibroblast cultures. Immunology 100:70-76   DOI
16 Chubb RC, Churchill AE 1969 Effect of maternal antibody on Marek's disease. Vet Rec 85:303-305   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Calnek BW, Schat KA, Ross LJ, Chen CL 1984 Further characterization of Marek's disease virus-infected lymphocytes. II. In vitro infection. Int J Cancer 33:399-406   DOI
18 Lee LF, Witter RL 1991 Humoral immune responses to inactivated oil-emulsified Marek's disease vaccine. Avian Dis 35:452-459   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Burgess SC, Basaran BH, Davison TF 2001 Resistance to Marek's disease herpesvirus-induced lymphoma is multiphasic and dependent on host genotype. Vet Pathol 38:129-142   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Calnek BW 1972 Effects of passive antibody on early pathogenesis of Marek's disease. Infect Immun 6:193-198
21 Morimura T, Ohashi K, Sugimoto C, Onuma M 1998 Pathogenesis of Marek's disease (MD) and possible mechanisms of immunity induced by MD vaccine. J Vet Med Sci 60:1-8   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Loeffler DA, Schat KA, Norcross NL 1986 Use of $^{51}Cr$ release to measure the cytotoxic effects of staphylococcal leukocidin and toxin neutralization on bovine leukocytes. J Clin Microbiol 23:416-420
23 Sharma JM 1983 Presence of adherent cytotoxic cells and non-adherent natural killer cells in progressive and regressive Marek's disease tumors. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 5:125-140   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Keller LH, Lillehoj HS, Solonsky JM 1992 JMV-1 stimulation of avian natural killer cell activity. Avian Pathol 21:239-250   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Burgess SC, Davison TF 2002 Identification of the neoplastically transformed cells in Marek's disease herpesvirus-induced lymphomas: recognition by the monoclonal antibody AV37. J Virol 76:7276-7292   DOI
26 Quere P, Dambrine G 1988 Development of anti-tumoral cell-mediated cytotoxicity during the course of Marek's disease in chickens. Ann Rech Vet 19:193-201
27 Buscaglia C, Calnek BW 1988a Maintenance of Marek's disease herpesvirus latency in vitro by a factor found in conditioned medium. J Gen Virol 69:2809-2818   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Gupta MK, Chauhan HV, Jha GJ, Singh KK 1989 The role of the reticuloendothelial system in the immunopathology of Marek's disease. Vet Microbiol 20:223-234   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Powell PC, Davison TF 1986 Induction of Marek's disease in vaccinated chickens by treatment with betamethasone or corticosterone. Israel J Vet Med. 42:73-78
30 Qureshi MA, Miller L 1991 Comparison of macrophage function in several commercial broiler genetic lines. Poult Sci 70:2094-2101   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Lam KM, Linna TJ 1979 Transfer of natural resistance to Marek's disease (JMV) with non-immune spleen cells. I. Studies of cell population transferring resistance. Int J Cancer 24: 662-667   DOI
32 Legler DF, Loetscher M, Roos RS, Clark-Lewis I, Baggiolini M, Moser B 1998 B cell-attracting chemokine 1, a human CXC chemokine expressed in lymphoid tissues, selectively attracts B lymphocytes via BLR1/CXCR5. J Exp Med 187:655-660   DOI
33 Balu S, Kaiser P 2003 Avian interleukin-12beta (p40): cloning and characterization of the cDNA and gene. J Interferon Cytokine Res 23:699-707   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Bumstead N 1998 Genetic resistance to avian viruses. Rev Sci Tech. 17:249-255
35 Xing Z, Schat KA 2000a Inhibitory effects of nitric oxide and gamma interferon on in vitro and in vivo replication of Marek's disease virus. J Virol 74:3605-3612   DOI
36 Barrow AD, Burgess SC, Baigent SJ, Howes K, Nair VK 2003 Infection of macrophages by a lymphotropic herpesvirus: a new tropism for Marek's disease virus. J Gen Virol 84: 2635-2645   DOI   ScienceOn
37 Liu JL, Lin SF, Xia L, Brunovskis P, Li D, Davidson I, Lee LF, Kung HJ 1999 MEQ and V-IL8: cellular genes in disguise? Acta Virol 43:94-101
38 Powell PC, Hartley KJ, Mustill BM, Rennie M 1983 Studies on the role of macrophages in Marek's disease of the chicken. J Reticuloendothel Soc 34:289-297
39 Schumacher D, Tischer BK, Fuchs W, Osterrieder N 2000 Reconstitution of Marek's disease virus serotype 1 (MDV-1) from DNA cloned as a bacterial artificial chromosome and characterization of a glycoprotein B-negative MDV-1 mutant. J Virol 74:11088-11098   DOI
40 Secombes CJ, Kaiser P 2003 The phylogeny of cytokines. Pages 57-84 In : The Cytokine Handbook, 4th ed. Thomson A, Lotze MT (eds) Academic Press, London
41 Kodama H, Mikami T, Inoue M, Izawa H 1979 Inhibitory effects of macrophages against Marek's disease virus plaque formation in chicken kidney cell cultures. J Natl Cancer Inst 63:1267-1271
42 Churchill AE, Chubb RC, Baxendale W 1969 The attenuation, with loss of oncogenicity, of the herpes-type virus of Marek's disease (strain HPRS-16) on passage in cell culture. J Gen Virol 4:557-564   DOI   ScienceOn
43 Heller ED, Schat KA 1987 Enhancement of natural killer cell activity by Marek's disease vaccines. Avian Pathol 16:51-60   DOI
44 Sharma JM, Okazaki W 1981 Natural killer cell activity in chickens: target cell analysis and effect of antithymocyte serum on effector cells. Infect Immun 31:1078-1085
45 Sharma JM, Graham CK 1982 Influence of maternal antibody on efficacy of embryo vaccination with cell-associated and cell-free Marek's disease vaccine. Avian Dis 26:860-870   DOI   ScienceOn
46 Schat KA, Markowski-Grimsrud CJ 2001 Immune responses to Marek's disease virus infection. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 255:91-120
47 Toth TE 2000 Nonspecific cellular defense of the avian respiratory system: a review. Dev Comp Immunol 24:121-139   DOI   ScienceOn
48 Dandapat S, Pradhan HK, Mohanty GC 1994 Anti-idiotype antibodies to Marek's disease-associated tumour surface antigen in protection against Marek's disease. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 40:353-366   DOI   ScienceOn
49 Garcia-Camacho L, Schat KA, Brooks R Jr, Bounous DI 2003 Early cell-mediated immune responses to Marek's disease virus in two chicken lines with defined major histocompatibility complex antigens. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 95:145-153   DOI   ScienceOn
50 Hong CC, Sevoian M 1971 Interferon production and host resistance to type II avian (Marek's) leukosis virus (JM strain). Appl Microbiol 22:818-820
51 Powell PC 1975 Immunity to Marek's disease induced by glutaraldehyde-treated cells of Marek's disease lymphoblastoid cell lines. Nature 257:684-685   DOI   ScienceOn
52 Lee LF, Sharma JM, Nazerian K, Witter RL 1978 Suppression and enhancement of mitogen response in chickens infected with Marek's disease virus and the herpesvirus of turkeys. Infect Immun 21:474-479
53 Davison F, Kaiser P 2004 Immunity to Marek's disease. Pages 126-141 In: Marek's disease(an evolving problem). Davison F and Nair V, (Ed.) Elsevier Academic Press, New York
54 Higgins DA, Calnek BW 1976 Some effects of silical treatment on Marek's disease. Infect Immun 13:1054-1060
55 Schat KA, Calnek BW, Weinstock D 1986 Cultivation and characterisation of avian lymphocytes with natural killer cell activity. Avian Pathol 15:539-556   DOI
56 Brunovskis P, Chen X, Velicer LF 1992 Analysis of Marek's disease virus glycoproteins D, I and E. Pages 118-122. In Proceedings of the 19th World's Poultry Congress, vol. 1. 4th International Symposium on Marek's Disease. Ponsen and Looijen, Wageningen
57 Kaiser P, Underwood G, Davison F 2003 Differential cytokine responses following Marek's disease virus infection of chickens differing in resistance to Marek's disease. J Virol 77: 762-768   DOI