1 |
Lee HS, O'Mahony M. Difference test sensitivity: Cognitive contrast effects. J. Sens. Stud. 22: 17-33 (2007)
|
2 |
O'Mahony M. Understanding discrimination tests: A user-friendly treatment of response bias, rating, and ranking R-index tests and their relationship to signal detection. J. Sens. Stud. 7: 1-47 (1992)
DOI
|
3 |
Vie A, O'Mahony M. Triangular difference testing: Refinements of sequential sensitivity analysis for predictions for individual triads. J. Sens. Stud. 4: 87-103 (1989)
DOI
|
4 |
O'Mahony M, Odbert N. A comparison of sensory difference testing procedures sequential sensitivity analysis and aspects of taste adaptation. J. Food Sci. 50: 1055-1058 (1985)
DOI
|
5 |
O'Mahony M, Goldstein LR. Effectiveness of sensory difference tests sequential sensitivity analysis for liquid food stimuli. J. Food Sci. 51: 1550-1553 (1986)
DOI
|
6 |
Rousseau B, O'Mahony M. Sensory difference tests: Thurstonian and SSA predictions for vanilla flavored yogurts. J. Sens. Stud. 12: 127-146 (1997)
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Ennis DM. The power of sensory discrimination methods. J. Sens. Stud. 8: 353-370 (1993)
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Tedja S, Nonaka R, Ennis DM, O'Mahony M. Triadic discrimination testing-refinement of Thurstonian and Sequential Sensitivity Analysis approaches. Chem. Senses 19: 279-301 (1994)
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
O'Mahony M, Rousseau B. Discrimination testing: A few ideas, old and new. Food Qual. Prefer. 14: 157-164 (2002)
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
O'Mahony M. Who told you the triangle test was simple? Food Qual. Prefer. 6: 227-238 (1995)
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Masuoka S, Hatjopoulos D, O'Mahony M. Beer bitterness detection: Testing Thurstonian and Sequential Sensitivity Analysis models for triad and tetrad methods. J. Sens. Stud. 10: 295-306 (1995)
DOI
|
12 |
Rousseau B, Meyer A, O'Mahony M. Power and sensitivity of the same-different test: Comparison with triangle and duo-trio methods. J. Sens. Stud. 13: 149-173 (1998)
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
Dessirier JM, Siffermann JM, O'Mahony M. Taste discrimination by the 3-AFC method: Testing sensitivity predictions regarding particular tasting sequences based on the sequential sensitivity analysis model. J. Sens. Stud. 14: 271-287 (1999)
DOI
|
14 |
Green DM, Swets JA. Signal Detecting Theory and Psychophysics. 3rd ed. Peninsula Publishing, Los Altos, CA, USA. pp. 7-148 (1988)
|
15 |
O'Mahony M, Goldstein LR. Tasting successive salt and water stimuli: The roles of adaptation, variability in physical signal strength, learning, supra- and subadapting signal detectability. Chem. Senses 12: 425-436 (1987)
DOI
|
16 |
Ennis DM. Relative power of difference testing methods in sensory evaluation. Food Technol.-Chicago 44: 114-118 (1990)
|
17 |
Macmillan NA, Creelman CD. Detection Theory: A User's Guide. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA. pp. 1-138 (2005)
|
18 |
Ennis DM, O'Mahony M. Probabilistic models for sequential taste effects in triadic choice. J. Exp. Psychol. Human 5: 1088-1097 (1995)
|
19 |
Rousseau B, Stroh S, O'Mahony M. Investigating more powerful discrimination tests with consumers: Effects of memory and response bias. Food Qual. Prefer. 13: 39-45 (2002)
DOI
ScienceOn
|
20 |
Lee HS, O'Mahony M. The evolution of a model: A review of Thurstonian and conditional stimulus effects on difference testing. Food Qual. Prefer. 18: 369-383 (2007)
DOI
ScienceOn
|
21 |
Dessirier JM, O'Mahony M. Comparison of d' values for the 2-AFC (paired comparison) and 3-AFC discrimination methods: Thurstonian models, sequential sensitivity analysis, and power. Food Qual. Prefer. 10: 51-58 (1999)
DOI
ScienceOn
|
22 |
Lee HS, O'Mahony M. Sensory difference testing: Thurstonian models. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 13: 841-847 (2004)
|