Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0175

Damage scenarios and an onboard support system for damaged ships  

Choi, Jin (Korea Research Institute of Ships & Ocean Engineering/KIOST)
Lee, Dongkon (Korea Research Institute of Ships & Ocean Engineering/KIOST)
Kang, Hee Jin (Korea Research Institute of Ships & Ocean Engineering/KIOST)
Kim, Soo-Young (Department of Naval Architecture & Ocean Engineering, Pusan National University)
Shin, Sung-Chul (Department of Naval Architecture & Ocean Engineering, Pusan National University)
Publication Information
International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering / v.6, no.2, 2014 , pp. 236-244 More about this Journal
Abstract
Although a safety assessment of damaged ships, which considers environmental conditions such as waves and wind, is important in both the design and operation phases of ships, in Korea, rules or guidelines to conduct such assessments are not yet developed. However, NATO and European maritime societies have developed guidelines for a safety assessment. Therefore, it is required to develop rules or guidelines for safety assessments such as the Naval Ship Code (NSC) of NATO. Before the safety assessment of a damaged ship can be performed, the available damage scenarios must be developed and the safety assessment criteria must be established. In this paper, the parameters related to damage by accidents are identified and categorized when developing damage scenarios. The need for damage safety assessment criteria is discussed, and an example is presented. In addition, a concept and specifications for the DB-based supporting system, which is used in the operation phases, are proposed.
Keywords
Ship safety assessment; Damage scenarios; Collision; Grounding; Damage safety criteria; Behavior simulation;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Lee, D., Lee, S.S. and Park, B.J., 2004. 3-D geometric modeler for rapid ship safety assessment. Ocean Engineering, 31 (10), pp.1219-1230.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Choung, J., Lee, M.S., Jeon, S.I., Nam, J.M. and Ha, T.B., 2011. Residual longitudinal strengths of asymmetrically damaged ships. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 48(3), pp.246-253.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 HARDER, 2003. Harmonisation of Rules and Design Rationale, EU Contact No. GDRB-CT-1998-00028, Final Technical Report. London: IMO Publishing.
4 IMO, 2009. SOLAS Consolidated Edition 2009. London: IMO Publishing.
5 Lutzen, M., 2001. Ship collision damage. PhD Thesis. Technical University of Denmark.
6 NATO Standardization Agency (NSA), 2012. Naval ship code. ANEP-77 edition 4 version 1. Brussels: Allied Naval Engineering Publication.
7 Riola, J.M. and Perez, R., 2009. Warship damage stability criteria case study. Journal of Maritime Research, 6(3), pp.75-100.
8 Yvan, L. and Jan, P., 2010. New developments in damage control interactive incident board management system-I2BMS. Proceedings of American Society of Naval Engineers, Virginia, 10 Augest 2010.
9 Zhu, L., James, P. and Zhang, S., 2002. Statistics and damage assessment of ship grounding. Marine Structures, 15(4-5), pp.515-530.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Zhang, S., 1999. The mechanics of ship collisions. Lyngby: Technical University of Denmark.