Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.593

Effect of Breed (Lean or Fat Pigs) and Sex on Performance and Feeding Behaviour of Group Housed Growing Pigs in a Tropical Climate  

Renaudeau, D. (Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Unite de Recherches Zootechniques)
Giorgi, M. (Unite de Production et de Sante Animale)
Silou, F. (Unite de Production et de Sante Animale)
Weisbecker, J.L. (Unite de Production et de Sante Animale)
Publication Information
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences / v.19, no.4, 2006 , pp. 593-600 More about this Journal
Abstract
The effects of breed and sex on individual growth performance and feeding behaviour were studied between 45 and 90 kg BW in two replicates of forty group-housed pigs. The first and the second replicates were carried out during the warm season (i.e. between February and April 2003) and during the hot season (i.e. between August and October 2003), respectively. During the warm season, ambient temperature and relative humidity averaged $25.3^{\circ}C$ and 86.0%. The corresponding values for the hot season were $27.9^{\circ}C$ and 83.6%. The pigs were grouped in pens of 10 animals on the basis of breed (Creole or Large White) and sex (gilt or castrated male) and given ad libitum access to a grower diet (9.0 MJ/kg net energy and 158 g/kg crude protein) via feed intake recording equipment (Acema 48). An ear-tag transponder was inserted into each pig and this allowed the time, duration, and size of individual visits to be recorded. The growth performance and feeding pattern were significantly affected by breed, sex, and season. The Creole pigs (CR) had a lower average daily gain (ADG) (642 vs. 861 g/d, p<0.01) and carcass lean content ($LC_{90kg}$) (35.4 vs. 54.5%; p<0.01) and a higher backfat thickness at 90 kg BW ($BT_{90kg}$) (23.4 vs. 10.4 mm; p<0.01) than Large White pigs (LW) whereas the average daily feed intake (ADFI) was not affected by breed (2.34 vs. 2.22 kg/d, respectively for CR and LW pigs; p>0.10). Consequently, the food:gain ratio was higher in CR than in LW (3.65 vs. 2.58; p<0.01). CR had less frequent meals but ate more feed per meal than LW (5.9 vs. 8.8 meals/d and 431 vs. 279 g/meal; p<0.01). The rate of feed intake was lower (27.6 vs. 33.9 g/min; p<0.01) and the ingestion time per day and per meal were higher in CR than in LW (87.1 vs. 69.7 min/d and 15.8 vs. 8.4 min/meal; p<0.01). The ADFI and BT90 kg were higher (2.38 vs. 2.17 kg/d and 18.1 vs. 15.9 mm; p<0.05) and LC90 kg was lower (43.5 vs. 46.4%; p<0.01) in castrated males (CM) than in gilts (G) whereas ADG was not affected by sex (p = 0.12). The difference in lean content between CM and G was greater in CR than in LW. The ADFI and ADG were reduced during the hot season (2.18 vs.2.38 kg/d and 726 vs. 777 g/d, respectively; p<0.05) whereas feed conversion and carcass lean content were not affected by season (p>0.05). Average feeding time per meal and meal size decreased during the hot season (10.9 vs. 13.2 min/meal and 316 vs. 396 g/meal; p<0.01) whereas the rate of feed intake was not affected by season (p = 0.83). On average, 0.69 of total feed intake was consumed during the diurnal period. However, this partition of feed intake was significantly affected by breed, sex, and season. In conclusion, the breed, sex and season significantly affect performance and feeding pattern in growing pigs raised in a tropical climate. Moreover, the results obtained in the present study suggest that differences observed in BW composition between CR and LW are associated with difference in feeding behaviour, in particular, the short-term regulation of feed intake.
Keywords
Pigs; Feeding Behaviour; Breed; Sex; Season; Tropical Climate;
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By Web Of Science : 8  (Related Records In Web of Science)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 8
연도 인용수 순위
1 Azzara, A. V. 2004. Genetic and biobehavioral analysis of the controls of meal size in mice. Appetite 42:107-109   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Canope, I. and Y. Raynaud. 1981. Etude comparative des performances de reproduction, d'engraissement et de carcasse des porcs Creoles et large White en Guadeloupe. Journee de la Recherche Porcine en France 13:307-316
3 Foster, W. H., D. J. Kilpatrick and I. H. Heaney. 2004. Genetic variation in the efficiency of energy utilization by the fattening pig. Anim. Prod. 37:387-393   DOI
4 Hyun, Y., B. F. Wolter and M. Ellis. 2001. Feed intake pattern and growth performance of purebred and crossbred Meishan and Yorkshire pigs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 14:837-843   DOI
5 Le Dividich, J., J. Noblet, P. Herpin, J. van Milgen and N. Quiniou. 1998. Thermoregulation. In: Progress in Pig Science (Ed. J. Wiseman, M. A. Varley and J. P. Chadwick), pp. 229-263. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham
6 Quiniou, N., S. Dubois and J. Noblet. 2000a. Voluntary feed intake and feeding behaviour of group-housed growing pigs are affected by ambient temperature and body weight. Lives. Prod. Sci. 63:245-253   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Quiniou, N., D. Renaudeau, S. Dubois and J. Noblet. 2000c. Effect of diurnally fluctuating high ambient temperatures on performance and feeding behaviour of multiparous lactating sows. Anim. Sci. 71:571-575   DOI
8 Renaudeau, D., J. L. Weisbecker and J. Noblet. 2003. Effect of season and dietary fibre on feeding behaviour of lactating sows in a tropical climate. Anim. Sci. 77:429-437   DOI
9 Wangsness, P. J., J. L. Gobble and G. W. Sherrit. 1980. Feeding behavior of lean and obese pigs. Physiol. Behav. 24:407-410   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Berbigier, P. 1975. Echanges thermiques au niveau de la peau des porcelets eleves en climat tropical 1. Influence des conditions climatiques et de la race. Annales de Zootechnie 24:423-432   DOI
11 Kadzere, C. T., M. R. Murphy, N. Silznikove and E. Maltz. 2002. Heat stress in lactating dairy cows: a review. Lives. Prod. Sci. 77:59-91   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Lee, D. N., H. T. Yen and C. S. Chi. 1995. Factors affecting feed intake in boars. J. Chin. Soc. Anim. Sci. 24:237-246
13 Noblet, J., C. Karege and S. Dubois. 1994. Prise en compte de la variabilité de la composition corporelle pour la prevision du besoin energetique et de l'efficacite alimentaire chez le porc en croissance. Journees de la Recherche Porcine en France 26:267-276
14 Quiniou, N., S. Dubois, Y. L. Cozler, J. F. Bernier and J. Noblet. 1999a. Effect of growth potential (body weight and breed/castration combination) on the feeding behaviour of individually kept growing pigs. Lives. Prod. Sci. 61:13-22   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Hyun, Y. and M. Ellis. 2002. Effect of group size and feeder type on growth performance and feeding patterns in finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 80:568-574
16 de Haer, L. C. M. and A. G. de Vries. 1993. Effects of genotype and sex on the feed intake pattern of group housed growing pigs. Lives. Prod. Sci. 36:223-232   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Massabie, P., R. Granier and J. L. Dividich. 1996. Influence de la temperature ambiante sur les performances zootechniques du porc a l'engrais alimente ad libitum. Journees de la Recherche Porcine en France 28:189-194
18 Metayer, A. and G. Daumas. 1998. Estimation, par decoupe, de la teneur en viande maigre des carcasses de porcs. Journees de la Recherche Porcine en France 30:7-11
19 Hyun, Y., M. Ellis, F. K. McKeith and E. R. Wilson. 1997. Feed intake pattern of group-housed growing-finishing pigs monitored using a computerized feed intake recording system. J. Anim. Sci. 75:1443-1451
20 Nielsen, B. L., A. B. Lawrence and C. T. Whittemore. 1995. Effect of group size on feeding behaviour, social behaviour, and performance of growing pigs using single- space feeders. Lives. Prod. Sci. 44:73-85   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Quiniou, N., J. Noblet, J. Y. Dourmad and J. van Milgen. 1999b. Influence of energy supply on growth characteristics in pigs and consequences for growth modelling. Lives. Prod. Sci. 60:317-328   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Houpt, T. R. 1984. Control of feeding in pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 59:1345-1353   DOI
23 Xin, H. and J. A. de Shazer. 1991. Swine responses to constant and modified diurnal cyclic temperatures. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 34:2533-2540   DOI
24 Levasseur, P., V. Courboulay, M. C. Meunier-Salaün, J. Y. Dourmad and J. Noblet. 1998. Influence de la source d'energie et de la concentration energetique de l'aliment sur le comportement alimentaire, les performances zootechniques et les qualites de carcasse du porc charcutier. Journees de la Recherche Porcine en France 30:245-252
25 Noblet, J., C. Karege, S. Dubois and J. van Milgen. 1999. Metabolic utilization of energy and maintenance requirements in growing pigs: effects of sex and genotype. J. Anim. Sci. 77:1208-1216
26 Labroue, F., R. Gueblez, P. Sellier and M. C. Meunier-Salaün. 1994. Feeding behaviour of group-housed Large White and Landrace pigs in French central test stations. Lives. Prod. Sci. 40:303-312   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Nielsen, B. L. 2001. The effect of group size on the behaviour and performance of growing pigs using computerised single-space feeders. Pig News and Information 14:127N-129N
28 Rinaldo, D., I. Canope, R. Christon, C. Rico, J. Ly and F. Dieguez. 2003. Creole pigs in Guadeloupe and Cuba : a comparison of reproduction, growth performance and meat quality in relation to dietary and environmental conditions. Pig News and Information 24:17-26
29 Quiniou, N., D. Renaudeau, A. Collin and J. Noblet. 2000b. Effets de l'exposition au chaud sur les caracteristiques de la prise alimentaire du porc a diferents stades phydiologiques. INRA Prod. Anim. 13:233-245
30 Quiniou, N., P. Massabie and R. Granier. 2002. Diurnally variation of ambient temperature around 24 or 28$^{\circ}C$: Influence on performance and feeding behavior of growing pigs. In: Swine Housing. Proceedings of the First International Conference. pp. 232-239. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
31 SAS.1997. SAS/STAT User's Guide (version 7 4th Ed.). SAS Inst.Inc.cary, NC
32 Feedes, J. J. R., B. A. Young and J. A. DeShazer. 1989. Influence of temperature and light on feeding behaviour of pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 23:215-222   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Nienaber, J. A., G. L. Hahn, R. L. Korthals and T. P. McDonald. 1993. Eating behavior of swine as influenced by environmental temperature. Transactions of the ASAE 36:937- 944
34 Rinaldo, D., J. Le Dividich and J. Noblet. 2000. Adverse effects of tropical climate on voluntary feed intake and performance of growing pigs. Lives. Prod. Sci. 66:223-234   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Nienaber, J. A., G. L. Hahn, R. A. Eigenberg, R. L. Korthals, J. T. Yen and D. L. Harris. 1997. Genetic and heat stress interaction effects on finishing swine. In: Proceeding of the fifth International Symposium - Livestock Environment (Ed. R. W. Bottcher and S. J. Hoff), pp. 1017-1023. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Bloomington, Minnesota
36 de Haer, L. C. M. and J. W. M. Merks. 1992. Patterns of daily food intake in growing pigs. Anim. Prod. 54:95-104   DOI