1 |
Aspinall, B. (2017). Code breaker: increase creativity, remix assessment, and develop a class of coder ninjas! San Diego, CA: Dave Burgess Consulting, Inc.
|
2 |
Batista, S., & Baptista, C. (2014). Learning object for linear systems: Scratch in mathematics. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 5(1), 71-81.
|
3 |
Calder, N. (2010). Using Scratch: An integrated problem solving approach to mathematical thinking. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 15(4), 9-14.
|
4 |
Elliot, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Milton Keynes and Philadelphia: Open University Press.
|
5 |
Graves, D. (1990). Computer science and math: Estranged partners in a changing world. Education, 110(4), 486-489.
|
6 |
Guzdial, M. (2016). Bringing computer science to U.S. schools, state by state. Communications of the ACM, 59(5), 24-25.
DOI
|
7 |
Humble, S. (2018). Creating the coding generation in primary schools: A practical guide for cross-curricular teaching. New York, NY: Routledge.
|
8 |
Israel, M., Wherfel, Q., Pearson, J., Shehab, S., & Tapia, T. (2015). Empowering K-12 students with disabilities to learn computational thinking and computer programming. Teaching Exceptional Children, 48(1), 45-53.
DOI
|
9 |
Johnson, L., Becker, A., Estrada, S., & Freeman, A. (2014). NMC Horizon Report: 2014 K-12 edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved from http://www.nmc.org/pdf/2014-nmc-horizon-report-he-EN.pdf
|
10 |
Kalelioglu, F., & Gulbahar, Y. (2014). The effects of teaching programming via Scratch on problem solving skills: A discussion from learners' perspective. Informatics in Education, 13(1), 33-50.
|
11 |
Ke, F. (2014). An implementation of design-based learning through creating educational computer games: A case study on mathematics learning during design and computing. Computers and Education, 73, 26-39
DOI
|
12 |
Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2, 34-46.
DOI
|
13 |
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2001) Handbook of action research. London: Sage.
|
14 |
Lye, S., & Koh, J. (2014). Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12? Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 51-61.
DOI
|
15 |
Moreno-Leon, J., Robles, G., & Roman-Gonzalez, M. (2016). Code to learn: Where does it belong in the K-12 curriculum?. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 15, 283-303.
DOI
|
16 |
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.
|
17 |
Resnick, M., M., Monroy-Hernandez, J., Rusk, A., Eastmond, N., Brennan, E., & Silverman, B. (2009). Scratch: programming for all. Communications of the ACM, 52(11), 60-67.
DOI
|
18 |
Saez-Lopez, J., Roman-Gonzalez, M., & Vazquez-Cano, E. (2016). Visual programming languages integrated across the curriculum in elementary school: A two year case study using "Scratch" in five schools. Computers & Education, 97(C), 129-141.
DOI
|
19 |
Songy, S. (2018). How a Tough Challenge Taught My Students More about Coding Than I Ever Could. The Education Digest, 83(8), 47-50.
|
20 |
Yadav, A., Stephenson, C., & Hong, H. (2017). Computational thinking for teacher education. Communications of the ACM, 60(4), 55-62.
DOI
|