1 |
Doerr, H. M., & Zangor, R. (2000). Creating meaning for and with the graphing calculator. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41, 143-163.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Harskamp, E. G., Suhre, C. J. M., & van Streun, A. (2000). The graphics calculator and students' solution strategies. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 12(1), 37-52.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Quesada, A. R., & Maxwell, M. E. (1994). The effects of using graphing calculators to enhance college students' performance in precalculus. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27(2), 205-215.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Thompson, D. R., & Senk, S. L. (2001). The effects of curriculum on achievement in second-year algebra: The example of the University of Chicago School Mathematics Project. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 58-84.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Hollar, J. C., & Norwood, K. (1999). The effects of a graphing-approach intermediate algebra curriculum on students' understanding of function. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(2), 220-226.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Ellington, A. J. (2003). A meta-analysis of the effects of calculators on students' achievement and attitude levels in precollege mathematics classes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(5), 433-463.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Texas Instruments (2002). Handheld graphing technology in secondary mathematics: Research findings and implications for classroom practice .Texas Instruments.
|
8 |
Boers, M. A., & Jones, P. L. (1994). Students' use of graphics calculators under examination conditions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 25, 491-516.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Dahland, G., & Lingefjard, T. (1996). Graphing calculators and students'interpretations of results: A study in four upper secondary classes in Sweden. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 4(2-3), 31-50.
|
10 |
Drijvers, P., & Doorman, M. (1996). The graphics calculator in mathematics education. J ournal of Mathematical Behavior, 15, 425-440.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Fey, J. T., Heid, M. K., Good, R. A., Sheets, C., Blume, G. W., & Zbiek, R. M.(1995). Concepts in algebra: A technological approach. Dedham, MA:Janson Publications.
|
12 |
Forster, P. A., & Mueller, U. (2001). Outcomes and implications of students' use of graphics calculators in the public examination of calculus. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science andTechnology, 32(1), 37-52.
DOI
|
13 |
Graham, A. T., & Thomas, M. O. J. (2000). Building a versatile understanding of algebraic variables with a graphic calculator. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41(3), 265-282.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Guin, D., & Trouche, L. (1998). The complex process of converting tools into mathematical instruments: The case of calculators. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 3(3), 195-227.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
Hennessy, S., Fung, P., & Scanlon, E. (2001). The role of the graphic calculator in mediating graphing activity. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 32, 267-290.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Merriweather, M., & Tharp, M. L. (1999). The effect of instruction with graphing calculators on how general mathematics students naturalistically solve algebraic problems. Journal of Compters in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 18(1), 7-22.
|
17 |
Hong, Y., Toham, M., & Kiernan, C. (2000). Supercalculators and university entrance calculus examinations. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 12(3), 321-336.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Keller, B. A., & Hirsch, C. R. (1998). Student preferences for representations of functions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 29(1), 1-17.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Mackey, K. (1999). Do we need calculators? In Z. Usiskin(Ed.),Mathematics education dialogues(p. 3). Reston, VA: NCTM.
|
20 |
Mitchelmore, M., & Cavanagh, M. (2000). Students' difficulties in operating a graphics calculator. Mathematics Education Research Journal,12(3), 254-268.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
21 |
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
|
22 |
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(2005). Technologysupported mathematics learning environments: Sixty-seventh yearbook.Reston, VA: NCTM
|
23 |
Ruthven, K. (1990). The influence of graphic calculator use on translation from graphic to symbolic forms. Educational Studies in Mathematics,21(5), 431-450.
DOI
|
24 |
Schwarz, B. B., & Hershkowitz, R. (1999). Prototypes: Brakes or levers in learning the function concept? The role of computer tools. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(4), 362-389.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
25 |
Slavit, D. (1998). Three women's understandings of algebra in precalculus course integrated with the graphing calculator. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(3), 303-389.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
26 |
Ballheim, C. (1999). How our readers feel about calculators. In Z.Usiskin(Ed.), Mathematics education dialogues(p. 4). Reston, VA: NCTM.
|
27 |
Smith, B. A. (1997). A meta-analysis of outcomes from the use of calculators in mathematics education. (Texas A&M University, 1996). Dissertation Abstracts International, 58, 787A.
|
28 |
Waits, B. K., & Demana, F. (2000). Calculators in mathematics teaching and learning: Past, present, and future. In E. D. Laughbaum(Ed.),Hand-held technology in mathematics and science education: A collection of papers. The Ohio State University.
|