Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2003.45.2.251

On-site Output Survey and Feed Value Evaluation on Agro- industrial By-products  

Kwak, W. S. (chool of Life Resources and Environmental Sciences, College of Natural Sciences)
Yoon, J. S. (chool of Life Resources and Environmental Sciences, College of Natural Sciences)
Publication Information
Journal of Animal Science and Technology / v.45, no.2, 2003 , pp. 251-264 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was conducted to make on-site survey on the output pattern and utilization situation of 19 by-products selected, to evaluate their nutritional characteristics, to find out a reliable index with which digestion of by-products can be predicted on the basis of chemical compositions analyzed and to diagnose the risk of using book values in the absence of the actual values analyzed for diet formulation. Production and utilization situations of by-products were quite various. Nutritionally, fruit processing by-products such as apple pomace (AP), pear pomace (PP), grape pomace (GP), and persimmon peel (PSP), and bakery by-products (BB) were classified as energy feeds. Soybean curd meal (SCM), animal by- products such as blood (BD), feather meal (FM) and poultry by-products (PB), and activated milk processing sludge (AMS) were classified as protein feeds. Soy hulls (SH), spent mushroom compost (SMC), barley malt hulls (BMH), waste paper (WP) and broiler litter (BL) were classified as roughage. Rumen contents (RC) and restaurant food waste (FW) were nutritionally analogous to complete diets for cattle and swine, respectively. Compared to soybean meal (SBM), BD and FM contained high (P<0.05) levels of amino acids and barley malt sprouts (BMS), AMS and FW contained low (P<0.05) levels of amino acids. Enzymatic (pepsin) digestibilities of proteinaceous feeds ranged between 99 and 66%. In vitro DM digestibility was high (P<0.05) in the order of FW, BB, AP, SH, PP, PSP, BMH, BMS, SCM, GP, RC, PB, BL, WP, SMC, AMS, FM and BD. In vitro DM digestibility had the highest correlation (r=0.68) with nonfibrous carbohydrate among chemical components. Differences between analyzed values of chemical components and book values were considerable. Caution is required in using book values when large amount of by-products are used in diets.
Keywords
By-product; Waste; Feed; Amino acid; Digestibility;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Belyea, R. L., Steevens, B. J., Restrepo, R. J. and Clubb, A. P. 1989. Variation in composition of by-product feeds. J. Dairy Sci. 72:2339-2345.   DOI
2 Bisaria, R., Madan, M. and Vasudevan, P. 1997. Utilization of agro-residues as animal feed through bioconversion. Bioresource Technology 59:5-8.
3 Boucque, C. H. V. and Fiems, L. O. 1988. Vegetable by-products of agro-industrial origin. Livest. Prod. Sci. 19:97-135.
4 Chung, D. Y. 2001. Policy plan on recycling of food waste. In: The $5^{th}$ symposium on Hygienic Use and Technology of Food Waste as Feed. National Livestock Research Institute, Suwon. Pp. 35-46.
5 DePeters, E. J., Fadel, J. G. and Arosemena, A. 1997. Digestion kinetics of neutral detergent fiber and chemical composition within some selected by-product feedstuffs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 67:127-140.
6 El-Yassin, F. A., Fontenot, J. P. and Chester- Jones, H. 1991. Fermentation characteristics and nutritional value of ruminal contents and blood ensiled with untreated or sodium hydroxide-treated wheat straw. J. Anim. Sci. 69:1751-1759.
7 Negi, S. S. 1985. A review on the utilization of agricultural wastes as feeds for livestock and experimental safeguards against erroneous conclusions. Agricultural Wastes 13:93-103.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 National Research Council, 1983. Underutilized Resources as Animal Feedstuffs. National Academy Press., Washington, D. C., USA.
9 National Research Council. 1988. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle (6th Rev. Ed.). National Academy Press., Washington, D. C., USA.
10 National Research Council. 1998. Nutrient Requirements of Swine (10th Rev. Ed.). National Academy Press., Washington, D. C; USA.
11 Park, J. H. and Song, Y. H. 1996. The effects of dried soybean curd residue supplementation on the performance of broilers and layers. Korean J. Anim, Sci. 38(3):205-214.
12 Statistix7. 2000. Use's Manual. Analytical Software, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
13 Abe, A. 2001. Use of food processing by products and TMR center. (Translated by U. M. Yang) TMR Research Society and National Livestock Research Institute, Suwon.
14 Gasa, J., Casstrillo, C., Baucells, M. D. and Guada, J. A. 1989. By - products from the canning industry as feedstuff for ruminants: digestibility and its prediction from chemical composition and laboratory bioassay. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 25:67-77.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis (15th Ed.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, D. C., USA.
16 Arosemena, A., DePeter, E. J. and Fadel, J. G. 1995. Extent of variability in nutrient composition within selected by-product feedstuffs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 54:103-120.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Fiske, C. H. and Subbarow, Y. 1925. The colorimetric determination of phosphorus. J. Biol. Chem. 66:375-400.
18 Hamza, A. 1989. Utilization of agro - industrial residues in Alexandria: Experience and prospects. Biological Wastes 29:107-121.
19 Kim, Y. B., Lee, J. B., Sung, K. S. and Lee, N. H. 1998. Effects of physical processing on protein content and pepsin-digestibility of feather meals. Korean J. Anim. Sci. 40(1):103-110.
20 Korean Standard Feed Composition Tables. 1988. Standard Feeding Councils. National Livestock Research Institute, Rural Development Administration.
21 Mowrey, A, Ellersieck, M. R. and Spain, J. N. 1999. Effect of fibrous by - products on production and ruminal fermentation in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 82:2709-2715.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Myer, R. O., Brendemuhl, J. H. and Johnson, D. D. 1999. Evaluation of dehydrated restaurant food waste products as feedstuffs for finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 77:685-692.   DOI
23 Tilley, J. M. A. and Terry, R. A. 1963. A two stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Br. Grassl. Soc. 18:104.
24 Van Soest, P. J., Mertens, D. R. and Deinum, B. 1978. Preharvest factors influencing quality of conserved forage. J. Anim. Sci. 47(3):712-720.
25 Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B. and Lewis, B. A. 1991. Methods of dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3583-3597.   DOI