Browse > Article

The Effect of the Consumption Monitoring Inaccuracy by Vision on Kimbab Intake and Satiety Rate  

Chang, Un-Jae (Department of Food & Nutrition, DongDuk Women's University)
Jung, Eun-Young (Department of Food & Nutrition, Korea University)
Suh, Hyung-Joo (Department of Food & Nutrition, Korea University)
Kim, Jin-Man (Department of Food Science & Biotechnology of Animal Resources, Konkuk University)
Hong, In-Sun (Department of Food & Nutrition, DongDuk Women's University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Community Nutrition / v.13, no.2, 2008 , pp. 237-243 More about this Journal
Abstract
It was examined whether altering vision would influence food intake through consumption monitoring and whether this would be reflected in consumption estimate and satiety. The experiment was designed in two visibility levels: 1) an accurate visual cue (bowl covered with wrap) vs 2) a biased visual cue (bowl covered with foil). Thirty three female college students participated in this study. The subjects ate Kimbab in the lab once a week for 2 weeks. They were served 24 pieces of Kimbab in a bowl covered either with wrap or foil. The results showed that the actual Kimbab intake from the bowl covered with foil was significantly lower than the test using wrap ($13.4{\pm}3.3$ pieces vs $15.0{\pm}3.8$ pieces, p < 0.05). And there were no significant differences from the cognitive Kimbab intake between the tests with foil and wrap. However, the satiety rate of Kimbab in a bowl covered with foil was significantly higher than that with wrap at 1 hour and 2 hour after the Kimbab eaten (p < 0.05). Less consumed cases were recognized by subjects due to the inaccuracy during the consumption monitoring process. This result revealed that vision influences not only eating behavior but also subjective feelings of satiety after meal. In conclusion, the consumption monitoring by visual cues can play an important role in food intake and satiety rate.
Keywords
vision; monitoring; Kimbab; wrap; foil;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Hill AJ, Magson LD, Blundell JE (1984): Hunger and palatability: tracking ratings of subjective experience before, during and after the consumption of preferred and less preferred food. Appetite 5(4): 361-371   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Rolls BJ, Bell EA, Waugh BA (2000): Increasing the volume of a food by incorporating air affects satiety in men. Am J Clin Nutr 72(2): 361-368   DOI
3 Rozin P (1982): "Taste-smell confusions" and the duality of the olfactory sense. Percept Psychophys 31(4): 397-401   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Wansink B, Painter JE, North J (2005): Bottomless bowls: why visual cues of portion size may influence intake. Obes Res 13(1): 93-100   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Westerterp-Plantenga MS (1999): Effects of extreme environments on food intake in human subjects. Proc Nutr Soc 58(4): 791-798
6 Kwak TT, Kim SH, Park SJ, Cho TO, Choi EH (1996): The improvement of the sanitary production and distribution practices for packaged meals (Kimbab) marked in convenience stores using hazard anlaysis critical control point (HACCP) system. J Food Hyg Safety 11: 177-187
7 Stroebele N, de Castro JM (2004): Effect of ambience on food intake and food choice. Nutrition 20(9): 821-838   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Rolls BJ, Morris EL, Roe LS (2002): Portion size of food affects energy intake in normal-weight and overweight men and women. Am J Clin Nutr 76(6): 1207-1213   DOI
9 Garner DM, Garfinkel PE (1979): The Eating Attitudes Test: an index of the symptoms of anorexia nervosa. Psychol Med 9(2): 273-279   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Linne Y, Barkeling B, Rossner S, Rooth P (2002): Vision and eating behavior. Obes Res 10(2): 92-95   DOI
11 Lee YC, Kim KY, Koh K, Park TS, Kim SY, Oh KW, Kim MK (2000): Evaluation on nutritional balance of market-Kimbab and nutritionally adjusted Kimbab menu by the self-developed computer program. Korean J Dietary Culture 15(3): 163-174
12 Wansink B (2004): Environmental factors that increase the food intake and consumption volume of unknowing consumers. Annu Rev Nutr 24(1): 455-479   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Rolls ET, Rolls JH (1997): Olfactory sensory-specific satiety in humans. Physiol Behav 61(3): 461-473   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Yoon H (1998): An ecological study on the perception and consumption of convenience foods by Korean college students. Yonsei Univ Graduate Thesis
15 Stevenson RJ, Prescott J, Boakes RA (1999): Confusing tastes and smells: how odours can influence the perception of sweet and sour tastes. Chem Senses 24(6): 627-635   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Fowler JS, Logan J, Jayne M, Franceschi D, Wong C, Gatley SJ, Gifford AN, Ding YS (2002): Pappas N. "Nonhedonic" food motivation in humans involves dopamine in the dorsal striatum and methylphenidate amplifies this effect. Synapse 44(3): 175-180   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Zung WK (1986): Zung self-rating depression scale and depression status inventory. Assessment of depression. In N Sartorius & TA Ban (Eds) 221-231
18 Barkeling B, Linne Y, Melin E, Rooth P (2003): Vision and eating behavior in obese subjects. Obes Res 11(1): 130-134   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Rogers PJ, Hill AJ (1989): Breakdown of dietary restraint following mere exposure to food stimuli: interrelationships between restraint, hunger, salivation, and food intake. Addict Behav 14(4): 387-397   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Brobeck JR (1948): Food intake as a mechanism of temperature regulation. Yale J Biol Med 20: 545-552
21 Rodin J, McAvay G (1992): Determinants of change in perceived health in a longitudinal study of older adults. J Gerontol 47(6): 373-384   DOI
22 Caldwell C, Hibbert SA (2002): The influence of music tempo and musical preference on restaurant patrons' behavior. Psychol Mark 19(11): 895-917   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Wansink B, Painter JE, Lee YK (2006a): The office candy dish: proximity's influence on estimated and actual consumption. Int J Obes (Lond) 30(5): 871-875   DOI
24 Johnson WG (1974): Effect of cue prominence and subject weight on human food-directed performance. J Pers Soc Psychol 29(6): 843-848   DOI
25 Wansink B, van Ittersum K, Painter JE (2006b): Ice cream illusions bowls, spoons, and self-served portion sizes. Am J Prev 31(3): 240-243   DOI   ScienceOn