Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3795/KSME-A.2003.27.3.381

Shape Optimization of a CRT based on Response Surface and Kriging Metamodels  

Lee, Tae-Hee (한양대학교 기계공학부)
Lee, Chang-Jin (한양대학교 대학원 기계설계학과)
Lee, Kwang-Ki (한양대학교 대학원 기계설계학과)
Publication Information
Transactions of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers A / v.27, no.3, 2003 , pp. 381-386 More about this Journal
Abstract
Gradually engineering designers are determined based on computer simulations. Modeling of the computer simulation however is too expensive and time consuming in a complicate system. Thus, designers often use approximation models called metamodels, which represent approximately the relations between design and response variables. There arc general metamodels such as response surface model and kriging metamodel. Response surface model is easy to obtain and provides explicit function. but it is not suitable for highly nonlinear and large scaled problems. For complicate case, we may use kriging model that employs an interpolation scheme developed in the fields of spatial statistics and geostatistics. This class of into interpolating model has flexibility to model response data with multiple local extreme. In this study. metamodeling techniques are adopted to carry out the shape optimization of a funnel of Cathode Ray Tube. which finds the shape minimizing the local maximum principal stress Optimum designs using two metamodels are compared and proper metamodel is recommended based on this research.
Keywords
Metamodel; Response Surface Model; Kriging metamodel; CRT; Shape Optimization;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Simpson, T.W., Mauery, T.M., Korte, J.J. and Mistree, F., 1998, 'Comparison of Response Surface and Kriging Models for Multidisciplinary Design Optimization,' 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis & Optimization, Vol. 1, pp. 381-391
2 Lee, T.H., Lee, K.K. and Lee, K.S., 2002, 'Multi-criteria Shape Optimization of a Funnel in Cathode Ray Tubes using Response Surface Model,' Structural Multidisciplinary Optimization, accepted   DOI
3 ANSYS Inc. 2000, ANSYS User's Guide. Ver.5.6
4 Phoenix Integration Inc. 2000, ModelCenter User's Guide. Ver. 3.1
5 Cressie, N. A. C., 1993, Statistics for Spatial Data, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Ch 2 and Ch 3
6 Ryu, J.S. , Kim, M.S., Cha, K.J., Lee, T.H. and Choi, D.H., 2002, 'Kriging Interpolation Method for Geostatics and DACE Model,' KSME International Journal, Vol. 16, pp. 619-632   과학기술학회마을   DOI
7 Burrough, P.A. and Mcdonnell, R.A., 1998, Principles of Geographical Information Systems, OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS, Ch 6
8 Sacks, J., Welch, W.J., Mitchell, T.J. and Wynn, H.P., 1989, 'Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments,' Statistical Science, Vol. 4, No.4, 409-435   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Giunta, A.A. and Watson, L.T, 1998, 'A Comparison of Approximation Modeling Techniques: Polynomial Versus Interpolating Models,' 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis & Optimization, Vol. 1, pp. 392-404