Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2019.e10

Comparative Efficacy of Synthetic and Natural Tenderizers on Quality Characteristics of Restructured Spent Hen Meat Slices (RSHS)  

Kantale, Rushikesh Ambadasrao (Department of Livestock Products Technology, College of Veterinary Science, Guru Angad Dev University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences)
Kumar, Pavan (Department of Livestock Products Technology, College of Veterinary Science, Guru Angad Dev University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences)
Mehta, Nitin (Department of Livestock Products Technology, College of Veterinary Science, Guru Angad Dev University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences)
Chatli, Manish Kumar (Department of Livestock Products Technology, College of Veterinary Science, Guru Angad Dev University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences)
Malav, Om Prakash (Department of Livestock Products Technology, College of Veterinary Science, Guru Angad Dev University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences)
Kaur, Amanpreet (Department of Livestock Products Technology, College of Veterinary Science, Guru Angad Dev University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences)
Wagh, Rajesh Vishwanath (Department of Livestock Products Technology, College of Veterinary Science, Guru Angad Dev University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences)
Publication Information
Food Science of Animal Resources / v.39, no.1, 2019 , pp. 121-138 More about this Journal
Abstract
In the present study, comparative efficacy of natural as well as synthetic tenderizers on the quality characteristics of restructured spent hen meat slices (RSHS) was studied. Four different batches of RSHS viz. Control (without any tenderizer), T1 (1.25% calcium chloride replacing salt in formulation), T2 and T3 (1.5% each of pineapple rind and fig powder, replacing binder in the formulation) were developed in pre-standardized formulation. Vacuum tumbling was performed for 2.5 h and cooked product (RSHS) was assayed for quality attributes. Samples were packaged in aerobic conditions, stored for 21 days under refrigeration ($4{\pm}1^{\circ}C$) and were evaluated for pH, oxidative and microbial quality parameters at regular interval of 7 days. Water holding capacity of T2 was recorded the highest and significantly higher (p<0.05) than all other samples. The textural attributes of T2 were comparable to T1 but significantly higher (p<0.05) than C and T3. The colour attributes ($L^*$, $a^*$, and $b^*$ value) of T2 and T3 were improved due to use of natural tenderizers. During sensory evaluation, tenderness scores for T2 samples were recorded the highest. Throughout storage period, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), free fatty acids (FFA) and peroxide value (PV) followed an increasing trend for control as well as treated products; however, T2 showed a significantly (p<0.05) lower value than control and other treated samples. It can be concluded that good quality RSHS with better storage stability could be prepared by utilizing 1.5% pineapple rind powder as natural tenderizer.
Keywords
spent hen meat; restructure; tenderizers; quality evaluation;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Irshad A, Sharma BD, Ahmed SR, Talukder S, Malav OP, Kumar A. 2016. Effect of incorporation of calcium lactate on physico-chemical, textural, and sensory properties of restructured buffalo meat loaves. Vet World 9:151-159.   DOI
2 Joseph B, Raj SJ. 2011. Pharmacognostic and phytochemical properties of Ficus carica Linn -An overview. Int J Pharmtech Res 3:8-12.
3 Keeton JT. 1983. Effects of fat and NaCl/phosphate levels on the chemical and sensory properties of pork patties. J Food Sci 48:878-881.   DOI
4 Solomon A, Golubowicz S, Yablowicz Z, Grossman S, Bergman M, Gottlieb HE, Altman A, Kerem Z, Flaishman MA. 2006. Antioxidant activities and anthocyanin content of fresh fruits of common fig (Ficus carica L.). J Agric Food Chem 54:7717-7723.   DOI
5 Trichopoulou A, Vasilopoulou E, Georga K, Soukara S, Dilis V. 2006. Traditional foods: Why and how to sustain them. Trends Food Sci Technol 17:498-504.   DOI
6 Valenzuela A, Nieto S. 1996. Synthetic and natural antioxidants: Food quality protectors. Grasay Aceites 47:186-196.   DOI
7 Van Laack RLJM. 1999. The role of proteins in water-holding capacity of meat. In Quality attributes of muscle foods. Xiong YL, Ho CT, Shahidi F (ed). Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers, New York, NY, USA. pp 309-318.
8 Veberic R, Colaric M, Stampar F. 2008. Phenolic acids and flavonoids of fig fruit (Ficus carica L.) in the northern Mediterranean region. Food Chem 106:153-157.   DOI
9 Verma AK, Chatli MK, Kumar D, Kumar P, Mehta N. 2015. Efficacy of sweet potato powder and added water as fat replacer on the quality attributes of low-fat pork patties. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 28:252-259.   DOI
10 Verma AK, Chatli MK, Kumar P, Mehta N. 2018a. Effects of inclusion of porcine blood hydrolysate on physico-chemical quality, oxidative and microbial stability of pork batter stored at ($4{\pm}1^{\circ}C$). J Food Sci Technol 55:4758-4769.   DOI
11 Kumar P, Mehta N, Malav OP, Chatli MK, Rathour M, Verma AK. 2018b. Antioxidant and antimicrobial efficacy of watermelon rind extract in aerobically packaged pork patties stored under refrigeration temperature ($4{\pm}1^{\circ}C$). J Food Process Preserv 42:e13757.   DOI
12 Verma SK, Biswas S, Patra G. 2018b. Tenderizing effect of Cucumis trigonus Roxb and Carica papaya on emu meat chunks. J Anim Res 8:195-203.
13 Witte VC, Krause GF, Bailey ME. 1970. A new extraction method for determining 2-thiobarbituric acid value of pork and beef during storage. J Food Sci 35:582-585.   DOI
14 Bourne MC. 1978. Texture profile analysis. Food Technol 32:62-66.
15 Kumar P, Chatli MK, Mehta N, Malav OP, Verma AK, Kumar D, Rathour M. 2018a. Antioxidant and antimicrobial efficacy of sapota powder in pork patties stored under different packaging conditions. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour 38:593-605.   DOI
16 Kumar P, Kumar S, Bhat, ZF. 2012. Effect of sex on the quality characteristics of nuggets prepared from spent Vanaraja chicken meat. Indian J Poult Sci 47:218-221.
17 Lamsal BP, Faubion JM. 2009. The beneficial use of cereal and cereal components in probiotic foods. Food Rev Int 25:103-114.   DOI
18 Li T, Shen P, Liu W, Liu C, Liang R, Yan N, Chen J. 2014. Major polyphenolics in pineapple peels and their antioxidant interactions. Int J Food Prop 17:1805-1817.   DOI
19 Lucey JA. 2002. Formation and physical properties of milk protein gels. J Dairy Sci 85:281-294.   DOI
20 Liu J, Yeo HC, Doniger SJ, Ames BN. 1997. Assay of aldehydes from lipid peroxidation: Gas chromatography mass spectrometry compared with thiobarbituric acid. Anal Biochem 245:161-166.   DOI
21 Koniecko ES. 1979. Handbook for meat chemists. Avery, Wayne, NJ, USA. pp 53-55.
22 Naveena BM, Sen AR, Muthukumar M, Babji Y, Kondaiah N. 2011. Effects of salt and ammonium hydroxide on the quality of ground buffalo meat. Meat Sci 87:315-320.   DOI
23 Puupponen Pimia R, Nohynek L, Meier C, Kahkonen M, Heinonen M, Hopia A, Oksman Caldentey KM. 2001. Antimicrobial properties of phenolic compounds from berries. J Appl Microbiol 90:494-507.   DOI
24 Sah BNP, Vasiljevic T, McKechnie S, Donkor ON. 2016. Physicochemical, textural and rheological properties of probiotic yogurt fortified with fibre-rich pineapple peel powder during refrigerated storage. LWT-Food Sci Technol 65:978-986.   DOI
25 Raja WH, Kumar S, Bhat ZF, Kumar P. 2014. Effect of ambient storage on the quality characteristics of aerobically packaged fish curls incorporated with different flours. SpringerPlus 3:106.   DOI
26 Ramezani R, Aminlari M, Fallahi H. 2003. Effect of chemically modified soy proteins and ficin‐tenderized meat on the quality attributes of sausage. J Food Sci 68:85-88.   DOI
27 Sah BNP, Vasiljevic T, McKechnie S, Donkor ON. 2015. Effect of refrigerated storage on probiotic viability and the production and stability of antimutagenic and antioxidant peptides in yogurt supplemented with pineapple peel. J Dairy Sci 98:5905-5916.   DOI
28 Sheard PR. 2002. Processing and quality control of restructured meat. In Meat processing: improving quality. Kerry J, Kerry J, Ledward D (ed). CRC Press, Cambridge, England. pp 332-358.
29 Slatnar A, Klancar U, Stampar F, Veberic R. 2011. Effect of drying of figs (Ficus carica L.) on the contents of sugars, organic acids, and phenolic compounds. J Agri Food Chem 59:11696-11702.   DOI
30 Singh PK, Kumar S, Bhat ZF, Kumar P, Kumar A. 2015. Effect of processed oats and clove oil on the characteristics and storage quality of aerobically packaged chevon cutlets. Indian J Small Rumin 21:76-84.   DOI
31 Slavin J L. 2006. Figs: Past, present, and future. Nutri Today 41:180-184.   DOI
32 Snecdecor GW, Cochran WG. 1989. Statistical methods. 8th ed. Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
33 Apple JK, Yancey JWS. 2013. Water-holding capacity of meat. In The science of meat quality. Kerth CR (ed). John Wiley and Sons Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA. pp 119-146.
34 Akamittath JG, Brekke CJ, Schanus EG. 1990. Lipid oxidation and color stability in restructured meat systems during frozen storage. J Food Sci 55:1513-1517.   DOI
35 AOAC. 2000. Official methods of analysis. 17th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington DC, USA.
36 APHA. 1984. Compendium of methods for microbiological examination of foods. 2nd ed. American Public Health Association. Washington DC, USA.
37 Belcher MD, Kaddour-Djebbar I, Bollag WB, Davis LS. 2016. The proteolytic effect of bromelain on bullous pemphigoid antigen-2. J Am Acad Dermatol 75:838-840.   DOI
38 Benzie IFF. 1996. Lipid peroxidation: A review of causes, consequences, measurement, and dietary influences. Int J Food Sci Nutr 47:233-261.   DOI
39 Bhat ZF, Kumar S, Kumar P. 2015. Effect of Aloe vera on the lipid stability and storage quality of chicken nuggets. Nutr Food Sci 45:54-67.   DOI
40 Bosco AD, Castellini C, Bernardini M. 2001. Nutritional quality of rabbit meat as affected by cooking procedure and dietary vitamin E. J Food Sci 66:1047-1051.   DOI
41 Harzallah A, Bhouri AM, Amri Z, Soltana H, Hammami M. 2016. Phytochemical content and antioxidant activity of different fruit parts juices of three figs (Ficus carica L.) varieties grown in Tunisia. Ind Crops Prod 83:255-267.   DOI
42 DiazVela J, Totosaus A, Cruz-Guerrero AE, de Lourdes Perez-Chabela M. 2013. In vitro evaluation of the fermentation of added-value agroindustrial by-products: Cactus pear (Opuntia ficus-indica L.) peel and pineapple (Ananas comosus) peel as functional ingredients. Int J Food Sci Technol 48:1460-1467.   DOI
43 Froehlich DA, Gullett EA, Usborne WR. 1983. Effect of nitrite and salt on the color, flavor and overall acceptability of ham. J Food Sci 48:152-157.   DOI
44 El‐Gharbawi M, Whitaker JR. 1963. Factors affecting enzymatic solubilization of beef proteins. J Food Sci 28:168-172.   DOI
45 Hepton A, Hodgson AS. 2003. Processing. In The pineapple: Botany, production and uses. 1st ed. Bartholomew DP, Paull RE, Rohrbach KG (ed). CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK. pp 291-320.
46 Hinrichs JR, Whitaker JR. 1962. Enzymatic degradation of collagen. J Food Sci 27:250-254.   DOI
47 Huang YL, Chow CJ, Fang YJ. 2011. Preparation and physicochemical properties of fiber-rich fraction from pineapple peels as a potential ingredient. J Food Drug Anal 19:318-323.