Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2010.30.1.120

Comparison of Measuring Methods for Somatic Cell Count in Goat Milk  

Lee, Seung-Gyu (Animal Products Research and Development Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Kim, Min-Kyung (Animal Products Research and Development Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Lee, Yeon-Jeong (Animal Products Research and Development Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Jeong, Seok-Geun (Animal Products Research and Development Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Oh, Mi-Hwa (Animal Products Research and Development Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Kim, Dong-Hun (Animal Products Research and Development Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Park, Kwang-Wook (Sunchon National University)
Lee, Wan-Kyu (Chungbuk National University)
Ham, Jun-Sang (Animal Products Research and Development Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Publication Information
Food Science of Animal Resources / v.30, no.1, 2010 , pp. 120-123 More about this Journal
Abstract
The standard method for somatic cell counts in goat milk is the direct microscopic method after a pyronin Y-methyl stain. It has been reported, however, that are found to differ by measuring methods, but. A total of forty eight goat milk samples from eight farms were compared by pyronin Y-methyl stain, ADAM-SCC in National Institute of Animal Science, and Somacount 500 in Chungbuk Veterinary Service. The average SCC of the samples was $7.3{\times}10^5$ cells/mL by pyronin Y-methyl stain, $4.9{\times}10^5$ cells/mL by ADAM-SCC, and $11.6{\times}10^5$ cells/mL by Somacount 500. The correlations between the methods were not significant. SCC measuring equipment should be developed for reducing the SCC in goat milk, and pyronin Y-methyl green stain for estimating SCC in goat milk should be included in NVRQS Notice for livestock products processing and composition standards.
Keywords
goat milk; somatic cell counts;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
Times Cited By Web Of Science : 0  (Related Records In Web of Science)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 0
연도 인용수 순위
1 Bently Instrumnets. Somacount 300 & 500: High volume instruments that deliver exceptional precision. Available from: http://www.bentleyinstruments.com/PDFs/Soma300500.pdf. Accessed Feb. 10. 2010.
2 Digital Bio. ADAM-SCC. Available from: http://www.digital- bio.com/product/product01_1.php. Accessed Feb. 10. 2010.
3 Dulin, A. M., Paape, M. J., and Wergin, W. P. (1982) Differentiation and enumeration of somatic cells in goat milk. J. Food Prot. 45, 435-439.
4 Haenlein, G. F. W. and Hinckley, L. S. (1995) Goat milk somatic cell count situation in USA. Int. J. Anim. Sci. 10,305-310.
5 IDF. (1981) Laboratory methos for use in mastitis work. Bulletin No. 132. International Dairy Federation, Brussels.
6 ISO. (1997) Milk – Enumeration of somatic cells-Part 1: Microscopic. ISO13366. International Standards Organization, Geneva.
7 Miller, R. H., Paape, M. J., and Action, J. C. (1986) Comparison of milk somatic cell counts by Coulter and Fossomatic Counters. J. Dairy Sci. 69, 1942-1946.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Shin, J. H., Jeong, S. G, Han, G. S., Jang, A., Chae, H. S., Yoo, Y. M., Ahn, J. N., Woo, K. T., Choi, S. H., Lee, W. K., and Ham, J. S. (2008) Study on the somatic cell count grade of goat milk in Korea. Korean J. Food Sci. Ani. Resour. 28, 574-579.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
9 MIFAFF/NVRQS (2002) Raw milk sanitation grading Standards (NVRQS Notice 2002-4).
10 Packard Jr., V. S., Tatini, S., Fugua, R., Heady, J., and Gilman, C. (1992) Direct microscopic methods for bacteria or somatic cells. In: Methods for the examination of dairy products, R. T. Marshall, ed., 16th ed. Am. Public Health Assoc., Washington, DC. pp. 309-321.
11 MIFAFF/NVRQS (2008) Livestock products processing and composition Standards (NVRQS Notice 2008-27).
12 Food and Drug Administration. Direct microscopic somatic cell count. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/ AboutFDA/ReportsManualsForms/Forms/UCM071153.pdf. Accessed Feb. 10. 2010.