Comparison of cecal microbiota composition in hybrid pigs from two separate three-way crosses |
Yang, Yuting
(Yunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University)
Shen, Liyan (Yunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University) Gao, Huan (Yunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University) Ran, Jinming (Dazhou Vocational and Technical College) Li, Xian (Yunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University) Jiang, Hengxin (Yunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University) Li, Xueyan (Yunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University) Cao, Zhenhui (Yunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University) Huang, Ying (Yunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University) Zhao, Sumei (Yunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University) Song, Chunlian (Yunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University) Pan, Hongbin (Yunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University) |
1 | Diao S, Huang S, Chen Z, et al. Genome-wide signatures of selection detection in three south China indigenous pigs. Genes (Basel) 2019;10:346. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10050346 DOI |
2 | Kuhlers DL, Jungst SB, Little JA. An experimental comparison of equivalent terminal and rotational crossbreeding systems in swine: pig performance. J Anim Sci 1994;72:2578-84. https://doi.org/10.2527/1994.72102578x DOI |
3 | Pajarillo EA, Chae JP, Balolong MP, Kim HB, Seo KS, Kang DK. Pyrosequencing-based analysis of fecal microbial communities in three purebred pig lines. J Microbiol 2014;52:646-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-014-4270-2 DOI |
4 | Macy JM, Ljungdahl LG, Gottschalk G. Pathway of succinate and propionate formation in Bacteroides fragilis. J Bacteriol 1978;134:84-91. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.134.1.84-91.1978 DOI |
5 | Clemente JC, Ursell LK, Parfrey LW, Knight R. The impact of the gut microbiota on human health: an integrative view. Cell 2012;148:1258-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.035 DOI |
6 | Javurek AB, Spollen WG, Ali AM, et al. Discovery of a novel seminal fluid microbiome and influence of estrogen receptor alpha genetic status. Sci Rep 2016;6:23027. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23027 DOI |
7 | Tang G, Yang R, Xue J, et al. Optimising a crossbreeding production system using three specialised imported swine breeds in south-western China. Anim Prod Sci 2013;54:999-1007. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN13308 DOI |
8 | Suzuki K, Shibata T, Kadowaki H, Abe H, Toyoshima T. Meat quality comparison of Berkshire, Duroc and crossbred pigs sired by Berkshire and Duroc. Meat Sci 2003;64:35-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0309-1740(02)00134-1 DOI |
9 | Reid G. When microbe meets human. Clin Infect Dis 2004;39:827-30. https://doi.org/10.1086/423387 DOI |
10 | Mu C, Bian G, Su Y, Zhu W. Differential effects of breed and nursing on early-life colonic microbiota and immune status as revealed in a cross-fostering piglet model. Appl Environ Microbiol 2019;85:e02510-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02510-18 DOI |
11 | Hjorth MF, Blaedel T, Bendtsen LQ, et al. Prevotella-to-Bacteroides ratio predicts body weight and fat loss success on 24-week diets varying in macronutrient composition and dietary fiber: results from a post-hoc analysis. Int J Obes 2019;43:149-57. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-018-0093-2 DOI |
12 | Ryu YC, Choi YM, Lee SH, et al. Comparing the histochemical characteristics and meat quality traits of different pig breeds. Meat Sci 2008;80:363-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007. 12.020 DOI |
13 | Kovatcheva-Datchary P, Nilsson A, Akrami R, et al. Dietary Fiber-induced improvement in glucose metabolism is associated with increased abundance of Prevotella. Cell Metab 2015;22:971-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2015.10.001 DOI |
14 | Li Z, Wright AG, Si H, et al. Changes in the rumen microbiome and metabolites reveal the effect of host genetics on hybrid crosses. Environ Microbiol Rep 2016;8:1016-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-2229.12482 DOI |
15 | Suzuki K, Shibata T, Kadowaki H, Abe H, Toyoshima T. Meat quality comparison of Berkshire, Duroc and crossbred pigs sired by Berkshire and Duroc. Meat Sci 2003;64:35-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0309-1740(02)00134-1 DOI |
16 | Li X, Cao Z, Yang Y, et al. Correlation between jejunal microbial diversity and muscle fatty acids deposition in broilers reared at different ambient temperatures. Sci Rep 2019;9:11022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47323-0 DOI |
17 | Mitteer DR, Greer BD, Fisher WW, Cohrs VL. Teaching behavior technicians to create publication-quality, single-case design graphs in graphpad prism 7. J Appl Behav Anal 2018;51:998-1010. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.483 DOI |
18 | Baas TJ, Christian LL, Rothschild MF. Heterosis and recombination effects in Hampshire and Landrace swine: I. Maternal traits. J Anim Sci 1992;70:89-98. https://doi.org/10.2527/1992.70189x DOI |
19 | Jang D, Yoon J, Taye M, et al. Multivariate genome-wide association studies on tenderness of Berkshire and Duroc pig breeds. Genes Genomics 2018;40:701-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13258-018-0672-6 DOI |
20 | Godinho RM, Bergsma R, Silva FF, et al. Genetic correlations between feed efficiency traits, and growth performance and carcass traits in purebred and crossbred pigs. J Anim Sci 2018;96:817-29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skx011 DOI |
21 | Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Mahowald MA, Magrini V, Mardis ER, Gordon JI. An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature 2006;444:1027-31. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05414 DOI |
22 | Davenport ER. Elucidating the role of the host genome in shaping microbiome composition. Gut Microbes 2016;7:178-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2016.1155022 DOI |
23 | Wang J, Kalyan S, Steck N, et al. Analysis of intestinal microbiota in hybrid house mice reveals evolutionary divergence in a vertebrate hologenome. Nat Commun 2015;6:6440. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7440 DOI |
24 | Yang H, Xiao Y, Wang J, et al. Core gut microbiota in Jinhua pigs and its correlation with strain, farm and weaning age. J Microbiol 2018;56:346-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-018-7486-8 DOI |
25 | Crespo-Piazuelo D, Migura-Garcia L, Estelle J, et al. Association between the pig genome and its gut microbiota composition. Sci Rep 2019;9:8791. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45066-6 DOI |
26 | Rampelli S, Schnorr SL, Consolandi C, et al. Metagenome sequencing of the Hadza hunter-gatherer gut microbiota. Curr Biol 2015;25:1682-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.055 DOI |
27 | Collado MC, Isolauri E, Laitinen K, Salminen S. Distinct composition of gut microbiota during pregnancy in overweight and normal-weight women. Am J Clin Nutr 2008;88:894-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/88.4.894 DOI |
28 | Christensen OF, Legarra A, Lund MS, Su G. Genetic evaluation for three-way crossbreeding. Genet Sel Evol 2015;47:98. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-015-0177-6 DOI |