Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15267/keses.2022.41.2.395

Differences in Creative Personality and Environment between Higher-Level and Lower-Level Students in Scientific Creativity  

Kim, Minju (Seoul Munhyun Elementary School)
Lim, Chaeseong (Seoul National University of Education)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education / v.41, no.2, 2022 , pp. 395-417 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the correlation of creative personality, environment, process, and product as related to scientific creativity for different levels of elementary school students. We evaluated 105 fifth graders' responses to two tests: i) the scientific creativity test for creative process and product and ii) the self-report test for creative personality and environment. In the self-report test, creative personality comprises cognitive and affective personality, and creative environment constitutes home and school environments. To attain a deeper understanding of phenomena that cannot be explained by a quantitative analysis, interviews were conducted with four students who had the highest scores in creative product and four students who had the lowest scores in creative product while having higher-than-average scores in creative process. First, correlation of creative personality and environment were not significant. Second, in the interviews, students who had the highest scores in scientific creativity had common characteristics, namely, the ability to endure current difficulties to achieve future success and the propensity to listen to other people's ideas critically. Third, students who had the highest scores in creativity hailed from families that respected their opinions, whereas students with the lowest scores belonged to families that disregarded or neglected their opinions. Finally, this study specifies the criteria that should be considered for affective and environmental aspects of scientific creativity education.
Keywords
scientific creativity; creative process; creative product; creative personality; creative environment;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 송영욱, 김범기(2010). 과학적 태도 요소 선정 및 학교, 가정, 사회 상황을 고려한 과학적 태도 측정 도구 개발. 한국과학교육학회지, 30(4), 375-388.   DOI
2 유경훈, 박춘성(2013). 초중고 학생의 창의성 발달 특성 연구. 창의력교육연구, 13(2), 43-60.
3 성진숙(2003). 과학에서의 창의적 문제해결력에영향을 미치는 제 변수 분석: 확산적 사고, 과학 지식, 내.외 적동기, 성격 특성 및 가정 환경. 열린교육연구, 11(1), 219-237.
4 유경훈(2010). 창의적 산출물에 영향을 미치는 인지.정의.환경적 변인들 간의 구조분석 연구. 아시아교육 연구, 11(3), 71-95.
5 Amabile, T. M., Collins, M. A., Conti, R., Phillips, E., Picariello, M., Ruscio, J., & Whitney, D. (2018). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. UK: Routledge.
6 Runco, M. A. (2006). Creativity: Theories and Themes: Research, Development, and Practice. San Diego: Academic Press.
7 Huang, T. C. (2019). Do different learning styles make a difference when it comes to creativity? An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 100, 252-257.   DOI
8 Simonton, D. K. (2004). Exceptional creativity and chance: Creative thought as a stochastic combinatorial process. Beyond knowledge: Extracognitive aspects of developing high ability, 39-72. UK: Routledge.
9 Sawyer, R. K. (2012). Extending sociocultural theory to group creativity. Vocations and Learning, 5(1), 59-75.   DOI
10 Selby, E. C., Shaw, E. J., & Houtz, J. C. (2005). The creative personality. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(4), 300-314.   DOI
11 Simonton, D. K. (2012). Assessing scientific creativity: Conceptual analyses of assessment complexities. Commissioned paper, The Science of Science and Innovation Policy Conference, National Academy of Sciences.
12 Squalli, J., & Wilson, K. (2014). Intelligence, creativity, and innovation. Intelligence, 46, 250-257.   DOI
13 Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press.
14 Taylor, C. W. (1988). Various approaches to and definitions of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 99-121). UK: Cambridge University Press.
15 Treffinger, D. J., Young, G. C., Selby, E. C., & Shepardson, C. A. (2002). Assessing creativity. Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
16 Yoo, Y., Kang, Y., & Kim, J. (2013). The relationships among scientific creativity and general creativity, meta-cognition, and affective characteristics. Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction, 17(1), 109-128.   DOI
17 김명숙, 한기순(2008). 과학영재의 과학문제발견력 관련 변인에 대한 구조방정식모형 분석: 과학관련태도와 동기 및 자기조절 학습전략을 중심으로. 영재교육연구, 18(1), 23-52.
18 김민주, 임채성(2021). 초등학생의 창의 과정과 산물의 관계를 탐색하기 위한 과학 창의성 검사 도구 개발: 생명 영역을 중심으로. 초등과학교육, 40(4), 520-544.
19 Sitzmann, T., Ely, K., Brown, K. G., & Bauer, K. N. (2010). Self-assessment of knowledge: A cognitive learning or affective measure?. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(2), 169-191.   DOI
20 Sun, J. (2005). Assessing g oodness of fit in confirmatory factor analysis. Measurement and evaluation in counseling and development, 37(4), 240-256.   DOI
21 이송이(2006). 아동이 지각한 부모양육태도와 부모양육행동이 아동의 자기효능감에 미치는 영향. 가정과삶의질연구, 24(2), 61-71.
22 임채성(2012). 뇌기반진화적 접근법에 따른 창의적 과학문제해결 지도 모형 개발. 생물교육(구 생물교육학회지), 40(4), 429-452.
23 임채성(2014). 과학창의성 평가 공식의 개발과 적용. 초등과학교육, 33(2), 242-257.
24 조연순, 정지은(2012). 국내 창의성 교육 연구 동향분석: 창의성의 범주 및 수준을 중심으로. 영재교육연구, 22(2), 333-352.   DOI
25 조연순, 최경희(2000). 창의적 문제 해결력 신장을 위한 중학교 과학 교육과정 개발. 한국과학교육학회지, 20(2), 329-343.
26 최성연, 김성연, 김성원(2007). 학생과 부모의 과학에 대한 태도 측정 도구 개발. 한국과학교육학회지, 27(3), 272-284.
27 홍세희(2000). 구조 방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준과 그 근거. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 19(1), 161-177.
28 Albert, R. S., & Runco, M. A. (1989). Independence and cognitive ability in gifted and exceptionally gifted boys. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 18, 221-230.   DOI
29 Baer, J. (1998). The case for domain specificity of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11(2), 173-177.   DOI
30 이병희, 임웅(2010). 과학 영재의 창의적 행동 발현 변인의 상호작용에 대한 구조모형 검증. 영재와 영재교육, 9(2), 127-144.
31 Craft, A., Jeffrey, B., & Leibling, M. (Eds.). (2001). Creativity in education. London: A&C Black.
32 Urban, K. K. (2003). Toward a componential model of creativity. In D. Ambrose, L. M. Cohen, & A. J. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Creative intelligence: Toward theoretic integration (pp. 81-112). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
33 Jauk, E., Benedek, M., Dunst, B., & Neubauer, A. C. (2013). The relationship between intelligence and creativity: New support for the threshold hypothesis by means of empirical breakpoint detection. Intelligence, 41(4), 212-221.   DOI
34 Knowles, M. S., Holton III, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2005). The adult learner (6th ed.). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.
35 Lubart, T. I. (1999). 17 Creativity across cultures. Handbook of creativity, 339-350. UK: Cambridge University Press.
36 Lubart, T. I., & Sternberg, R. J. (1995). An investment approach to creativity: Theory and data. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & R. A. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 271-302). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37 박종원(2004). 과학적 창의성 모델의 제안: 인지적 측면을 중심으로. 한국과학교육학회지, 24(2), 375-386.
38 Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2006). Creativity, intelligence, and personality: A critical review of the scattered literature. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132, 355-429.   DOI
39 Dogan, I., & Ozdamar, K. (2017). The effect of different data structures, sample sizes on model fit measures. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 46(9), 7525-7533.   DOI
40 강현철(2013). 구성타당도 평가에 있어서 요인분석의 활용. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 43(5), 587-594.   DOI
41 김민주, 임채성(2018). 초등과학영재학생의 과학창의성에 대한 자기 평가, 교사 평가, 객관적 평가의 비교 분석. 초등과학교육, 37(4), 440-454.
42 Feldhusen, J. F., Denny, T., & Condon, C. F. (1965). Anxiety, divergent thinking, and achievement. Journal of educational psychology, 56(1), 40.   DOI
43 MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Preacher, K. J., & Hong, S. (2001). Sample size in factor analysis: The role of model error. Multivariate behavioral research, 36(4), 611-637.   DOI
44 Mansfield, R. S., & Busse, T. V. (1981). The psychology of creativity and discovery: Scientists and their work. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
45 Reiter-Palmon, R., Robinson-Morral, E. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Santo, J. B. (2012). Evaluation of self-perceptions of creativity: Is it a useful criterion?. Creativity Research Journal, 24(2-3), 107-114.   DOI
46 Eysenck, H. J. (1995). Creativity as a product of intelligence and personality. International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. 231-247). Boston, MA: Springer.
47 Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290-309.   DOI
48 Gray, C. E. (1966). A measurement of creativity in Western civilization. American Anthropologist, 68(6), 1384-1417.   DOI
49 Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
50 Harrington, D. M., Block, J. H., & Block, J. (1987). Testing aspects of Carl Rogers's theory of creative environments: Child-rearing antecedents of creative potential in young adolescents. Journal of personality and social psychology, 52(4), 851-856.   DOI
51 Farrington-Darby, T., & Wilson, J. R. (2006). The nature of expertise: A review. Applied ergonomics, 37(1), 17-32.   DOI
52 강정하, 최인수(2008). 과학적 창의성과 시각예술적 창의성. 영재교육연구, 18(2), 201-237.
53 김민주, 임채성(2022). 창의 과정과 산물의 구조적 관계에 따른 초등학생의 과학 창의성 유형 탐색. 한국과학교육학회지, 42(1), 33-49.   DOI
54 명전옥(1996). 과학교육에서 태도 연구의 개선방안: LISREL 을 활용한 연구 방법. 초등과학교육, 15(2), 327-345.
55 Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi delta kappan, 42(7), 305-310.
56 Runco, M. A. (2003). Education for creative potential. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(3), 317-324.   DOI
57 Meador, K. S. (2003). Thinking creatively about science: Suggestions for primary teachers. Gifted Child Today, 26(1), 25-29.   DOI
58 김미숙(2005). 중학생 영재와 일반학생의 과학 창의적 문제해결력에 미치는 영향요인 분석. 교육심리연구, 19(2), 477-503.
59 김민주, 임채성(2019). 초등과학영재학생의 과학창의성에 대한 자기 평가, 동료 평가의 비교 분석. 초등과학교육, 38(4), 439-452.
60 김영정(2002). 창의성과 비판적 사고. 인지과학, 13(4), 81-90.
61 김영채(2012). 창의력의 영역 보편성과 특수성: 쟁점과 TTCT 창의력 검사의 분석. 사고개발, 8(1), 1-29.
62 박상범, 박병기(2007). 창의적 성향.환경.과정 척도(C-DEPs) 의 개발 및 타당화. 교육심리연구, 21(4), 905-922.
63 정현철, 한기순, 김병노, 최승언(2002). 과학 창의성 계발을 위한 프로그램 개발: 이론과 예시를 중심으로. 한국지구과학회지, 23(4), 334-348.
64 Han, K. S., & Marvin, C. (2002). Multiple creativities? Investigating domain-specificity of creativity in young children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46(2), 98-109.   DOI
65 Mohamed, A. (2006). Investigating the scientific creativity of fifth-grade students. Doctoral dissertation, Arizona state University.
66 신문승(2010). 초등학생용 창의적 성향 검사의 개발 및 타당화. 초등교육연구, 23(3), 267-291.
67 윤회정, 박은미, 김지영, 이윤하, 방담이(2015). 중학생들 의 과학적 창의성 관련 변인 간 관계 분석 연구. 교과교육학연구, 19(4), 1005-1025.   DOI
68 임성만, 양일호, 임재근(2009). 영역 특수적인 입장에서의 과학적 창의성에 대한 정의, 구성요인에 대한 탐색. 과학교육연구지, 33(1), 31-43.   DOI
69 Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.   DOI
70 Hu, W., & Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 389-403.   DOI
71 Baer, J. (2014). Creativity and divergent thinking: A task-specific approach. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
72 Beghetto, R. A. (2006). Creative self-efficacy: Correlates in middle and secondary students. Creativity research journal, 18(4), 447-457.   DOI
73 Brown, T. A., & Moore, M. T. (2012). Confirmatory factor analysis. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 361-379). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
74 Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). The domains of creativity. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity, London: Sage
75 서민규(2012). 비판적 사고와 창의적 문제해결. 교양교육 연구, 6(3), 221-247.
76 Ross, J. A. (2006). The reliability, validity, and utility of self-assessment. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 11(1), 10.
77 Sawyer, R. K. (1999). The emergence of creativity. Philosophical psychology, 12(4), 447-469.   DOI
78 Adolf, J. (1982). Creative thinking through science. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 232 785). Retrieved September 1, 2008, from http://eric.ed.gov
79 조혜진, 김은진, 이형철(2011). e-PBL을 활용한 과학 독서 논술 프로그램이 초등과학영재의 창의성 및 과학적 태도에 미치는 효과. 대한지구과학교육학회지, 4(1), 74-82.   DOI
80 Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Whence creativity? Overlapping and dual-aspect skills and traits. In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the Muse (pp. 313-320). Mahwah, New Jersey: Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
81 Simonton, D. K. (1999). Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.