Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15267/keses.2018.37.1.066

Differences between Pre-service Elementary Teachers' Perceptions and Designs on Smart Tools in Developing Smart-based Lesson Materials  

Kang, Eunhee (Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education / v.37, no.1, 2018 , pp. 66-79 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to explore how pre-service elementary teachers perceive and use smart learning environments. For this purpose, 23 pre-service elementary teachers who took theory and practice in a science education course were asked to develop lesson materials using smart tools and make a self-report questionnaire. These data were categorized in an instructional, exploratory, and interactive approach, depending on how they guided students to access knowledge and information. As a result of the study, pre-service teachers perceived the smart tools as the exploratory and interactive learning tools to be used for students to actively search for and interact with data and knowledge. But in developing lesson materials, they usually used the smart tools for resource sharing and communication in the instructional manner. In conclusion, the gap between their perception of smart tools and lesson materials, and the educational implications will be discussed.
Keywords
affordance of smart tools; pre-service elementary teacher; smart-based lesson; perception and design;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 6  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Arias, A. M., Davis, E. A., Marino, J-C., Kademian, S. M. & Palincsar, A. S. (2016). Teachers' use of educative curriculum materials to engage students in science practices. International Journal of Science Education, 38(9), 1504-1526.   DOI
2 Brown, M. W. (2009). The teacher-tool relationship: Theorizing the design and use of curriculum materials. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann & G. M. Lloyd, (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 17-36). New York, NY: Routledge.
3 Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C. & Tseng, J. C. R. (2010). A two-tier test approach to developing location-aware mobile learning systems for national science courses. Computers & Educations, 55(4), 1816-1627.   DOI
4 Hogan, K., Nastasi, B. K. & Pressley, M. (1999). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instruction, 17(4), 379-432.   DOI
5 Jang, E., Kim, C-J. & Choe, S-U. (2017). Study of the roles of smart devices in co-constructing scientific models. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(5), 813-824.   DOI
6 Kang, E., Kim, C-J., Choe, S-U., Yoo, J., Park, H-J., Lee, S. & Kim, H-B. (2012). Small group interaction and norms in the process of constructing a model for blood flow in the heart. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(2), 372-397.   DOI
7 Kang, E. & Kim, H-B. (2017a). Elementary students' perceptions of role and epistemic authority in the activity about 'Making a pet poster'. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(4), 587-597.   DOI
8 Kang, E. & Kim, H-B. (2017b). Middle school students' prior models on excretory pathway in small group activities and whole class discussion. The Korean Journal of Biological Education, 45(4), 491-502.
9 Keehner, M., Hegarty, M., Cohen, C., Khooshabeh, P. & Montello, D. R. (2008). Spatial reasoning with external visualizations: What matters is what you see, not whether you interact. Cognitive Science, 32, 1099-1132.   DOI
10 Klopfer, E., Squire, K. & Jenkins, H. (2002). Environmental detectives: PDAs as a window into a virtual simulated world. Paper presented at International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education. Vaxjo: Sweden.
11 Maloney, J. F. & Simon, S. (2006). Mapping children's discussions of evidence in science to assess collaboration and argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 28(15), 1817-1841.   DOI
12 Park, S-K. (2013). An analysis of middle school students' perceptions and learning satisfaction in SMART learning-based science instruction. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 34(7), 727-737.   DOI
13 Ministry of Child and Youth Services(MCYS) (2012). Stepping stones: A resource on youth development. Ontario: Queen's Printer for Ontario.
14 Nam, H., Kang, H. & Noh, T. (2017). Features of using smart devices in socioscientific issues debate classes. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(5), 787-797.   DOI
15 Oliveira, A. W. & Sadler, T. D. (2008). Interactive patterns and conceptual convergence during student collaborations in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(5), 634-658.   DOI
16 Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211-246.   DOI
17 Richmond, G. & Striley, J. (1996). Making meaning in classrooms: Social processes in small-group discourse and scientific knowledge building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(8), 839-858.   DOI
18 Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
19 Song, Y. & Kong, S. C. (2017). Affordances and constraint of BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) for learning and teaching in higher education: Teachers' perspectives. Internet and Higher Education, 32, 39-46.   DOI
20 Wu, W-H., Wu, Y-C. J., Chen, C-Y., Kao, H-Y., Lin, C-H. & Huang, S-H. (2012). Review of trends from mobile learning studies: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 59(2), 817-827.   DOI
21 Zydney, J. M. & Warner, Z. (2016). Mobile apps for science learning: Review of research. Computers & Education, 94, 1-17.   DOI
22 Yang, C., Jo, M. & Noh, T. (2015). Investigation of teaching practices using smart technologies and science teachers' opinion on their application in science education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(5), 829-840.   DOI
23 Yun, S. (2016). Understanding the establishment of small group norms in productive scientific argumentation. Doctoral Dissertation in Seoul National University.