1 |
Abell, S. K., Bryan, L. A. & Anderson, M. A. (1998). Investigating preservice elementary science teacher reflective thinking using integrated media case-based instruction in Elementary Science Teacher Preparation. Science Education, 82(4), 491-510.
DOI
|
2 |
Ahopelto, I., Mikkila-Erdmann, M., Anto, E. & Penttinen, M. (2011). Future elementary school teachers' conceptual change concerning photosynthesis. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 55(5), 503-515.
DOI
|
3 |
Anderson, C., Sheldon, T. & Dubay, J. (1990). The effects of instruction on college nonmajors' conceptions of respiration and photosynthesis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(8), 761-776.
DOI
|
4 |
Aydogdu, B. & Ergin, O. (2008). The effects of openended and inquiry-based laboratory techniques on students' science process skills. Journal of Education Ege, 9(2), 15-36.
|
5 |
Bagci Kilic, G. (2003). Third international mathematics and science study (Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study-TIMSS): Science teaching, scientific research and the nature of science. Ilkogretim-Online, 2(1), 42-61.
|
6 |
Budak, E. (2008). The inquiry-based professional development workshop for preservice and in-service teachers of chemistry. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Gazi University.
|
7 |
Burrows, N. L. (2012). Reflective thinking by thinking by teachers and improvement in teaching practies. Doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University.
|
8 |
Carter, K. & Anders, D. (1996). Program pedagogy. In F. B. Murray (Ed.), The teacher educator's handbook: Building a knowledge base for the preparation of teachers (pp. 557-592). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
|
9 |
Chi, M. T. H. (2008). Three types of conceptual change: Belief revision, mental model transformation, and categorical shift. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook on conceptual change research (pp. 61-82). New York: Routledge.
|
10 |
Chiappetta, E. L. & Koballa, Jr. T. R. (2010). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools: Developing fundamental knowledge and skills for teaching (7th. ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hal.
|
11 |
Chung, A., Maeng, S., Lee, S. & Kim, C. (2007). Preservice science teachers' areas of practice concern and reflections on the science classes in student- teaching. Journal of the Korean Association for in Science Education, 27(9), 893-906.
|
12 |
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
|
13 |
Hazel, E. & Prosser, M. (1994). First-year university students' understanding of photosynthesis, their study strategies and learning context. The American Biology Teacher, 56(5), 274-279.
DOI
|
14 |
Eisen, Y. & Stavy, R. (1993). How to make the learning of photosynthesis more relevant. International Journal of Science Education, 15(2), 117-125.
DOI
|
15 |
Ercan, F. & Tasdere, A. (2011). Identification of teacher candidates' skills in designing experiments with various assessment tools. Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Sciences, 1(1), 231-238.
|
16 |
Hammanna, M., Phanb, T., Ehmerc, M. & Grimma, T. (2008). Assessing pupils' skills in experimentation. Journal of Biological Education, 42(2), 66-72.
DOI
|
17 |
Hodson, D. (1998) Teaching and learning science: Towards a personalized approach. Buckingham, Philadelphia. Open University Press.
|
18 |
Kang, Y. & Hwang, S. (2004). The categories and levels of special education preteachers' reflective thinking through experiencing simulated instruction. Asian Journal of Education, 5(4), 55-80.
|
19 |
Kijkuakul, S., Yutakom, N., Engkagul, A. & Barker, M. (2006). Developing a new teaching intervention to promote grade 11 students' students' learning of photosynthesis in thailand. Proceedings of the NARST 2006 Annual Meeting (San Francisco, CA, United States) April 3-6, 1-18.
|
20 |
Kim, Y. & Park, I. (2007). A study of appropriateness concerning photosynthetic product's experiments presented in science textbooks. Biology Education, 34(5), 595-604.
DOI
|
21 |
LaBoskey, V. K. (1993). A conceptual framework for reflection in preservice teacher education. In J. Calderhead & P. Gates (Eds.), Conceptualizing reflection in teacher development (pp. 23-38). Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
|
22 |
Loughran, J. (2007). Researching teacher education practices: Responding to the challenges, demands, and expectations of self-study. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(12), 12-20.
DOI
|
23 |
Lacin-Simsek, C. (2010). Classroom teacher candidates' sufficiency of analyzing the experiments in primary school science and technology textbooks' in terms of scientific process skills. Elementary Education Online, 9(2), 433-445.
|
24 |
Lee, K. (2008). The reflective education practice of the elementary Korean language education, The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 8(2), 275-292.
|
25 |
Lee, Y. & Im, S. (2011). An analysis of pre-service science teachers' reflective thinking about scientific experiment in experimental journal writings. Journal of the Korean Association for in Science Education, 31(2), 198-209.
|
26 |
Lumpe, A. & Staver, J. (1995). Peer collaboration and concept development: Learning about photosynthesis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(1), 77-98.
|
27 |
Moon, K. & Kim, Y. (2008). Secondary school students' understanding and performance of experiments on photosynthesis and respiration. Biology Education, 36(4), 537-554.
DOI
|
28 |
Munby, H. & Russell, T. (1992). Frames of reflection: An introduction. In T. Russell & H. Munby (Eds.), Teachers and teaching: From classroom to reflection (pp. 1-8). New York: Falmer Press.
|
29 |
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332.
DOI
|
30 |
Park, H., Jeong, D., Noh, S., Lim, H., Han, J. & Park, J. (2009). Identification of secondary chemistry teachers' ability to carry-out experimentation. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 53(6), 765-773.
DOI
|
31 |
Seo, H. & Koh, M. (2012). Change of reflective thinking level appearing in reflective journal writing of nurturing teachers: Focusing on activities. Journal of Early Childhood Education & Educare Welfare, 16(2), 245-268.
|
32 |
Park, S. & Kang, S. (2009). The case study of middleschool students' making conclusion on the anomalous results of problem-solving laboratory. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 25(1), 242-255.
|
33 |
Pennington, R. (2011), Reflective thinking in elementary preservice teachers' portfolios: Can it be measured and taught?. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 1(1), 37-49.
|
34 |
Ross, P., Tronson, D. & Ritchie, R. J. (2005). Modelling photosynthesis to increase. conceptual understanding. Journal of Biological Education, 40(2), 84-88.
DOI
|
35 |
Shin, A. (2007). The effects of reflective thinking on verbal interaction of the pre-service teachers in elementary science classes. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 26(4), 428-439.
|
36 |
Smith, E. & Anderson, C. (1984). Plants as producers: A case study of elementary science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(7), 685-698.
DOI
|
37 |
Songer, C. & Mintzes, J. (1994). Understanding cellular respiration: An analysis of conceptual change in college biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(6), 621-637.
DOI
|
38 |
Stavy, R., Eisen, Y. & Yaakobi, D. (1987). How students aged 13-15 understand photosynthesis. International Journal of Science Education, 9(1), 105-115.
DOI
|
39 |
Tan, M. & Temiz, B. K. (2003). The importance and role of the science process skills in science teaching. Pamukkale University Journal of Faculty of Education, 13(1), 89-101.
|
40 |
Von Glasersfeld, E. (1987). An introduction to radical constructivism. In P. Watzlawick (Ed.), The invented reality (pp. 17-40). New York: Norton.
|
41 |
Vosniadou, S. (2007). The cognitive-situative divide and the problem of conceptual change. Educational Psychologist, 42(1), 55-66.
DOI
|
42 |
Vosniadou, S., Vamvakoussi, X. & Skopeliti, I. (2008). The framework theory approach to the problem of conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 3-34). New York: Routledge.
|