One of the most important research works in modern business enterpise is the relation between the purpose of business enterprise and decision making behavior of manager. It is because the coincidence of the former and the latter is considered an ideal type in evaluating the result of business management. Here I have set up assumptions in order to solve the above statements: (1) What purpose does the modern business enterprise set up and what kind of economic background does it have? (2) What is the theory of maximization of stock value among the purposes of business enterprise? (3) What kind of decision making do we do in the maximization of stock value in busiess administration? (4) How is the behavior of business financial manager's intention and decision made? The result pursued under the above assumptions shows that business manager's behavior of decision making is affected according to the degree that he gets some information, but basically is determined in consideration of his autonomous standpoint, namely the stability of business enterprise and the stability of manager himself while he faithfully performs his duty which is entrusted by stockholders. Therefore we come to the conclusion that there is a little gap between a manager's behavior of decision-making and the purpose of stock value maximization.

1959년(年) 11월(月) St. Louis 연방은행 Review지(誌)에 발표된 통칭 St. Louis 방정식으로 불리는 Miehael W. Keran의 모형은 학계에 지대한 반향을 이르켰다. 동모형은 1919년에서 1969의 50년간의 자료를 토대로 재정정책 및 화폐정책을 대표하는 두 설명변수와 경제활동의 전반적지표로서 국민소득을 종속변수로하여 전자의 후자에 미치는 영향을 계량적으로 파악코저하는 회귀분석인데 만일 방정식이라는 접근방식이 구조적 특징이다. 본 연구는 1965년에서 1980년까지의 새로운 자료에 입각하여 동모형의 이론적 타당성을 비판적으로 검토하고, 또한 통계학적 신빙성을 제고(提高)할 수 있는 개선방안(改善方案)을 모색코저 시도(試圖)한 것이다. 우선 단일방정식(單一方程式) 접근(接近)의 문제점(問題點)인 종속변수의 EXOGENEITY를 시험하기 위(爲)한 소위 Reverse-Causation Argument를 재점검(再點檢)하였고, 이이서 동모형의 Specification을 면밀히 살펴왔다. 특히 이자율의 변동을 설명변수로 도입해서 동변수가 경제활동전반에 끼치는 영향을 추정함으로서 설명변수의 추가적 설정(說定)의 타당성여부를 검토하였다. Keran의 결과가 t, D-W 및 $R^2$ 등의 주요 통제치가 매우 미흡한 수준이였으므로 이들 통계치의 제고(提高)를 위해 Almond-lag 방식을 Cuchrane/Oreutt 기법(技法)과 결합해서 적용하여 Almond의 지연구조에 녹유(綠由)하는 자동상관(自動相關) 효과(效果)를 배제(排除)코저 하였다. 끝으로 본연구대상기간인 '65년에서 '80년간의 역사적 발전을 배경으로 동모형의 적용 결과를 재조명(再照明)함으로서 동모형의 타당성을 살펴봤다.

Although Korea is short of capital technology, and natural resources, she has achieved an outstanding progress by the export-drive policies by Korean government and the creative endeavor of Korean firms. As a result of that, Korean economy and enterprises are in the same file of newly industrialized countries and Korea is ready for an economic take-off as a developed country. But in the early 1980s, each country strengthens protective trade theory and resources nationalism, and this has a great influence on the field of international trade environment. In spite of that, to continue the same high development as that of the past. Korea must try to secure and find export markets, solve trade barriers, make sure of the long-term security of resources, develop technology, and strengthen economic cooperations. To satisfy these desires by 2000s, we must try to make Korean enterprises have the global competitive power and them grow strongly among world wide firm through capital and technology accumulated during the passed years, and to do so, there must be a foreign production and marketing management, too, this can be achieved only through foreign overseas direct investment. This investment has various forms, to say, verifical integrated, horizontal integrated. conglomerate integrated forms, and the amount of investment in each country from 18 century to today reaches 500 billion dollars. This investment is done by strategic, behavioral economic, and financial motives. So I am going to approach the fields of like these; in spite of the differences among political, economical, caltural, and social systems, and many risk compared with domestic enterprises, why do Korean firms witsh to transfer the productive facilities to overseas countries and run them there? What is the comparative advantage of foreign direct investment compared with domestic investment ?. why is the factor of comparative advantage transferred through foreign direct investment?, what is the motive of foreign overseas direct investment?, and last the ownership-specific factors and the theory of internalization, and the location specific factors were analysed chiefly. But in consideration of the given condition in Korea, Korean overseas direct investment must be propelled rationally on the basis of the above mentioned theory.

The theory of option pricing has undergone rapid advances in recent years. Simultaneously, organized option markets have developed in the United States and Europe. The closed form solution for pricing options has only recently been developed, but its potential for application to problems in finance is tremendous. Almost all financial assets are really contingent claims. Especially, Black and Scholes(1973) suggest that the equity in a levered firm can be thought of as a call option. When shareholders issue bonds, it is equivalent to selling the assets of the firm to the bond holders in return for cash (the proceeds of the bond issues) and a call option. This paper takes the insight provided by Black and Scholes and shows how it may be applied to many of the traditional issues in corporate finance such as dividend policy, acquisitions and divestitures and capital structure. In this paper a combined capital asset pricing model (CAPM) and option pricing model (OPM) is considered and then applied to the derivation of equity value and its systematic risk. Essentially, this paper is an attempt to gain a clearer focus theoretically on the question of corporate stock risk and how the OPM adds to its understanding.