East Asian mathematical journal

The Youngnam Mathematical Society (영남수학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Revisiting Learning Trajectories for Area and Volume

넓이와 부피 개념의 학습 경로에 대한 재고찰

  • Park, Sumin (Department of Mathematics Education Pusan National University) ;
  • Noh, Jihwa (Department of Mathematics Education Pusan National University)
  • Received : 2024.08.01
  • Accepted : 2024.08.27
  • Published : 2024.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study revisits the learning trajectories of area and volume concepts by examining and organizing them as proposed in previous research. Through a step-by-step analysis, these trajectories are compared with those presented in Korean elementary and middle school mathematics textbooks, as well as the U.S. Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSSM). The study identifies significant differences in how these concepts are presented and emphasizes the need for enhancing learning trajectories in Korean textbooks to better align with the findings of related empirical studies and international standards. The research provides recommendations for curriculum and textbook development, aiming to improve students' understanding and application of area and volume.

Keywords

References

  1. 고은성, 이은정, 황지현(2017). 초등학교 수학교과서 속 과제의 학습 경로 분석:넓이와 부피를 중심으로. 대한수학교육학회지, 27(2), 207-225.
  2. 교육부(2022). 수학과 교육과정. 교육부 고시 제2022-33호 [별책 8].
  3. 김경화(2008). 적분개념의 발달(리만적분에서 르베그적분으로의 이행을 중심으로). 한국수학사학회지, 21(3), 67-96.
  4. 김남희, 나귀수, 박경미, 이경화, 정영옥(2017). 예비교사와 현직교사를 위한 수학교육과정과 교재연구. 경문사
  5. 박수민(2020). 초.중등 수학 교과서 분석을 통한 넓이와 부피 개념에 대한 학습경로 조사. 부산대학교 석사학위 논문.
  6. 장혜원(2008). 구의 부피에 대한 수학사적 고찰 및 교수학적 함의. 한국수학사학회지, 21(2), 19-38.
  7. 정연준, 강현영(2008). 정적분의 무한소 해석에 대한 고찰. 학교수학, 10(3), 421-445.
  8. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is-or might be-the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6-8.
  9. Battista, M. T. (2007). The Development of geometric and spatial thinking. In F.K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 843-908). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
  10. Choppin, J. (2011). Learned adaptations: Teachers' understanding and use of curriculum resources. J ournal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(5), 331-353.
  11. Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2009). Learning and teaching early math: The learning trajectories approach. Routledge.
  12. Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J.(2004). Learning trajectories in mathmatics education. Mathematical Thinkng and Learning, 6(2), 81-89.
  13. Common Core State Standards Initiative (CCSSI). (2010). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSSM). http://www.corestandards.org/wp-content/uploads/Math_Standards1.pdf
  14. Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: How America's commitment to equity will determine our future. Teachers College Press.
  15. Duncan, G. J., & Magnuson, K. (2011). The nature and impact of early achievement skills, attention skills, and behavior problems. In G. J. Duncan & R. J. Murnane (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children's life chances (pp. 47-70). Russell Sage Foundation.
  16. Dunham, W. (2005). The calculus gallery: Masterpieces from Newton to Lebesgue. Princeton University Press.
  17. Duschl, R. A., & Bybee, R. W. (2022). Reconceptualizing STEM Education: The Central Role of Practices. Routledge.
  18. Eves, H. (1990). An introduction to the history of mathematics (6th ed.). Saunders College Publishing.
  19. Gravemeijer, K., & Cobb, P. (2006). Design research from a learning design perspective. In J. Van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 17-51). Routledge.
  20. Herbert, K., & Pierce, R. (2008). Developing Spatial Thinking Through Measurement. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 13(4), 18-21.
  21. Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2002). Symbolizing space in geometry and science: The role of knowledge and instruction. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(3), 167-205.
  22. Lehrer, R., & Chazan, D. (1998). Designing learning environments for developing understanding of geometry and space. In R. Lehrer & D. Chazan (Eds.), Designing learning environments for developing understanding of geometry and space (pp. 1-27). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  23. Remillard, J. T., & Heck, D. J. (2014). Conceptualizing the curriculum enactment process in mathematics education. ZDM, 46(5), 705-718.
  24. Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2020). Early childhood mathematics education research: Learning trajectories for young children (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  25. Simon, M. A., & Tzur, R. (2004). Explicating the role of mathematical tasks in conceptual learning: An elaboration of the hypothetical learning trajectory. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 91-104.
  26. Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 114-145.
  27. Smith, L. B., & Thompson, P. W. (2020). Conceptual foundations for teaching and learning area and volume. J ournal of Mathematical Behavior, 60, 100814.
  28. Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2010). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (7th ed.). Pearson.
  29. Wilson, C., & McLaren, B. (2023). Adaptive learning systems and learning trajectories: A personalized approach to education. J ournal of Educational Technology, 30(2), 114-130.