Journal of Industrial Convergence (산업융합연구)

DAEHAN Society of Industrial Management (대한산업경영학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exploring the Perceptions of Secondary Physical Education Teachers According to Changes in the Content System of the 2022 Revised Physical Education Curriculum

2022 개정 체육과 교육과정의 내용 체계 변화에 따른 중등 체육 교사의 인식 탐색

  • 김승용 (동서울대학교 레저스포츠학과)
  • Received : 2024.06.25
  • Accepted : 2024.08.20
  • Published : 2024.08.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to provide more effective and realistic basic data to the secondary physical education field by promoting a realistic understanding of the 2022 revised physical education curriculum and providing information on professional development and sustainable policy decisions. The research method was largely an analysis through literature review and qualitative research methods, and data was collected using in-depth interviews. As a result of the study, first, major changes in the content system were confirmed in the 2022 revised physical education curriculum. Second, it was possible to confirm understanding, changes, and improvements regarding the revised curriculum through the perceptions of field physical education teachers. In conclusion, in order for the 2022 revised physical education curriculum to be applied stably, it is believed that it must be accompanied by a systematic approach to teacher education, support for restructuring the curriculum, and improvement in the adaptability of field teachers to the curriculum.

본 연구는 2022 개정 체육과 교육과정의 현실적 이해를 도모하고, 전문성 개발 및 지속 가능한 정책 결정에 대한 정보를 제공함으로서 중등 체육 교육 현장에 보다 더 효과적이고 실제적인 기초자료를 제공하는데 그 목적이 있다. 연구방법은 크게 문헌 연구를 통한 분석과 질적 연구방법이며 자료의 수집은 심층 면담 방식을 활용하였다. 연구의 결과 첫째, 2022 개정 체육과 교육과정에서 내용 체계의 큰 변화를 확인할 수 있었다. 둘째, 현장 체육 교사들의 인식을 통해 개정 교육과정에 관한 이해, 변화 그리고 개선점 등을 확인할 수 있었다. 결론적으로 2022 개정 체육과 교육과정이 안정적으로 적용되기 위해서는 교사 교육의 체계적인 접근과 교육과정의 재구성을 위한 지원, 그리고 교육과정에 대한 현장 교사들의 적응성에 관한 제고가 수반 되어야 할 것이라 생각된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Education (2022). Physical education and curriculum. Seoul: Ministry Education.
  2. K. J. Yoon. (2023). A study of exploring support plans for teachers to understand the 2022 revised physical education curriculum. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 26(2), 107-124. DOI : 10.29221/jce.2023.26.2.107
  3. H. W. Jung. (2023). 2022 revised physical education curriculum from the perspective of sports policy: Focusing on the content system. Korean Journal of Sport Pedagogy, 30(1), 1-20. DOI : 10.21812/kjsp.2023.1.30.1.1
  4. C. H. Park. (2021). Curriculum research: Confrontation and metapraxis between theory and practice. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  5. K. J. Yoon. (2019). Issues needed for the development of the next national physical education curriculum. Korean Journal of Sport Science, 30(2), 360-370. DOI : 10.24985/kjss.2019.30.2.360
  6. J. J. Park, C. W. Yu & G. I. Lee. (2022). The nature and content system of the next national level physical education curriculum. Korean Association of Sport Pedagogy, 29(1), 29-54. DOI : 10.21812/kjsp.2022.1.29.1.29
  7. J. Y. Park & S. Y. Kim. (2022). An inquiry about how to practice convergent physical education class based on capabilities for introducing the 2022 revised physical education curriculum: Focusing on the utilization of educational space in the metaverse. The Journal of LearnerCentered Curriculum and Instruction, 22(20), 593-610. DOI : 10.22251/jlcci.2022.22.20.593
  8. S. W. Park & Y. S. Kim. (2023). Analysis of changes in the 2022 revised elementary physical education curriculum content system and exploration of implications. Journal of Korean Society for the Study of Physical Education, 28(5), 1-11. DOI : 10.15831/JKSSPE.2023.28.5.1
  9. J. Y. Kim, H. S. Jung & H. J. Son. (2024). Elementary school pre-service teachers' perceptions of the 2022 revised physical education curriculum. Journal of Elementary Education, 40(1), 17-38. DOI : 10.23103/dnueje.2024.40.1.17
  10. H. Y. Park, D. H. Kim & J. K. Ryu. (2023). Exploration of motor development evidence reflected in the content system of the 2022 revised physical education curriculum and Derivation of future tasks. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 26(4), 19-46. DOI : 10.29221/jce.2023.26.4.19
  11. D. J. Clandinin & F. M. Connelly. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience & story in qualitative research. SanFrancisco: Jossy-Bass Publishers.
  12. Ministry of Education (2015). Physical education and curriculum. Seoul: Ministry Education.
  13. Sharan, B. M. (2009). Qualitative Research. Jossey-Bass.
  14. Merriam, S. B. (2002). Introduction to qualitative research. Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis, 1(1), 1-17.
  15. C. W. Kim & H. J. Yoon. (2017). A qualitative research paradigm for tourism and convention phenomena. Seoul: M&C Communications.
  16. H. J. Moon. (1998). Case study of sport education curriculum model in teaching physical education at a selected secondary school. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  17. J. P. Spradley. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Wingston.
  18. M. R. Park & H. S. Park. (2013). A study on the role of teachers in textbook writing process: focusing on the middle school history textbook writing. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 16(1), 55-79. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2013.16.1.55
  19. Ministry of Education (2022). 2022 Revised Curriculum Overview. Seoul: Ministry of Education.