품질경영학회지 (Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management)

  • 제52권1호
  • /
  • Pages.173-183
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 1229-1889(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-9005(eISSN)
한국품질경영학회 (Korean Society for Quality Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

6차 산업에서 기업가 정신이 지속가능성과 혁신성과에 미치는 영향

The Impact of Entrepreneurship on Sustainability and Innovation Performance in the 6th Industry

  • Junmo Kim (Department Of Public Administration, Kunkuk University) ;
  • Eunil Son (Research and Business Development Foundation, Pusan National University)
  • 투고 : 2024.01.16
  • 심사 : 2024.01.23
  • 발행 : 2024.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: This study highlights the importance of emphasizing entrepreneurship and sustainability among managers to address the challenges of Industry 6.0, especially in situations of increasing environmental uncertainty. The research model reveals the important structural relationship between entrepreneurship, sustainability, and innovation performance, and through empirical analysis, we sought to confirm that entrepreneurship in the 6th industry is related to technological innovation. Methods: A survey was conducted targeting 6th industry entrepreneurs, and the relationship was analyzed using SPSS and AMOS. Results: Despite a non-significant direct relationship between entrepreneurship and innovation performance, a notable effect of sustainability on innovation performance was identified. This highlights the fact that entrepreneurship contributes to firm performance through innovation activities, especially in the form of technological innovation. Conclusion: This study highlights the essential characteristics of entrepreneurship and sustainability, highlights their interconnectedness and suggests that their inclusion in the same management activities improves performance.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Al-Askari, A. S. 2011. The impact of entrepreneurship and innovation on developing the marketing strategy in business organizations-an. analytical study-. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research 5(2):105-117.
  2. Anderson, N. and King, N. 1993. Innovation in organizations. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 8:1-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01029762
  3. Armbruster, H., Bikfalvi, A., Kinkel, S., and Lay, G. 2008. Organizational innovation: the challenge of measuring non-technical innovation in large-scale surveys. Technovation 28(10):644-657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.03.003
  4. Brenkert, G. G. 2009. Innovation, rule breaking and the ethics of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing 24:448-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.004
  5. Camison, C. and Lopez, A. V. 2010. An examination of the relationship between manufacturing flexibility and firm performance. International Journal of Oper- ations & Production Management 30(8):853-878. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571011068199
  6. Covin, J. G. and Slevin, D. P. 1991. A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 16(1):7-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879101600102
  7. Damanpour, F. and Evan, W. M. 1984. Organizational innovation and performance: the problem of organizational lag. Administrative Science Quarterly 29(3):392-309.
  8. Davis, W. 1998. GreatMyths of Business, Kogan Page, Dover, NH. economic growth: The role of cyclical factors. International Businses Research 6(1):153-162.
  9. Eisenhardt, K. M. and Martin, J. A. 2000. Dynamic capabilities: what are they?. Strategic Management Journal 21(10-11):1105-1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
  10. Eun Ji Lee and Jaeyoung Moon. 2022. Analysis of CSR.CSV.ESG Research Trends - Based on Big Data Analysis. Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management 50(4):751-776. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2022.50.4.751
  11. Eunil Son. 2019. Gyeongnam 6th Industry Guide Book. Hankyungsa.
  12. Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., and Shalley, C. E. 2006. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal 49(4):693-706.
  13. Hage, J. and Dewar, R. 1973. Elite value vs organizational structure in predicting innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 18:279-290. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391664
  14. Ibourk, A. and Amaghouss, J. 2013. Entrepreneurial activities, innovation and economic growth: The role of cyclical factors. International Businses Research 6(1):153-162.
  15. Im, G. and Rai, A. 2008. Knowledge sharing ambidexterity in long-term interorganizational relationships. Management Science 54(7):1281-1296.
  16. Jaemin Park and Jungmann Lee. 2011. How Do Firms' Innovation Behaviors Affect their Outputs in Korea?. Journal of the Korea Contents Association 11(3):339-350. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2011.11.3.339
  17. Kanter, R. M. 1985. Supporting innovation and venture development in established companies. Journal of Business Venturing 1(1):47-60.
  18. Kanter, R. M. 1988. When a thousand flowers bloom: structural, social, and collective conditions for innovation in organization. Research in Organizational Behavior 10:169-211.
  19. Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P. 1992. Balanced scorecard-measure that drive performance. Harvard Business Review Jan.-Feb.:71-79.
  20. Kristal, M. M., Huang, X., and Roth, A. V. 2010. The effect of an ambidextrous supply chain strategy on combinative competitive capabilities and business performance. Journal of Operations Management 28(5):145-429.
  21. Kwangdoo Kim & Woonsun Hong. 2011. Effect of Firm's Activities on Their Performances. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society 14(2):373-404.
  22. Kwon, Hyeok GI & Son, Heon IL. 2014. The effects of entrepreneurship on innovational Behavior orientation: Focused on examining mediator effects of Affective Organizational Commitment. Journal of Daehan Academmy of Management Systems 33(3):77-92.
  23. Lee, E. J. & Cho, C. H. 2021. Analysis of Smart Factory Research Trends Based on Big Data Analysis. Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management 49(4):551-567.
  24. Low, M. B. and MacMillan, I. C. 1988. Entrepreneurship: past research and future challenges. Journal of Management 14(2):139-161.
  25. Lumpkin, G. T. and Dess, G. G. 2001. Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: the moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing 16:429-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00048-3
  26. McDougall, P. and Oviatt, B. 2000. International entrepreneurship: the intersection of two research paths. Academy of Management Journal 43(5):902-908.
  27. Miller, D. 1983. The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science 29(7):770-791. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.7.770
  28. Miller, D. 1993. Industry and country effects on managers' perceptions of environmental uncertainties. Journal of International Business Studies 24(4):693-714. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490251
  29. Mosey, S. 2005. Understanding new-tomarket product development in SMEs. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 25(2):114-130. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570510576994
  30. Nadkarni, S. 2013. Entrepreneurship and innovation in small business. Indian.
  31. Schumpeter, J. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development. Harvard University
  32. Simon, M., Elango, B., Houghton, S., and Savelli, S. 2002. The successful product pioneer: maintaining commitment while adapting to change. Journal of Small Business Management 40(3):187-203. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-627X.00050
  33. Tae Sun Kang, Youn Sung Kim, Dexter Jung, ESG Management Practice Led by BYN Black Yak: The Resource Circulation System for Recycling Domestic Transparent PET Bottle. Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management 49(3):433-446.
  34. Totterdell, P., Leach, D., Birdi, K., Clegg, C., and Wall, T. 2002. An investigation of the contents and consequences of major organizational innovations. International Journal of Innovation Management 6(4):343-368. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919602000641
  35. Zahra, S. 1991. Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship: an exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing 6(4):259-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(91)90019-A
  36. Zahra, S. and Covin, J.G. 1995. Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: a longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing 10(1):43-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)00004-E