A Study on the Relationship between Branding and Business Strategies of Korean Start-ups

한국 벤처창업기업의 상표와 비즈니스 전략간 연관성 분석

  • Hyukjoon Kim (Korea Institute of Intellectual Property) ;
  • Yoo-Jin Han (School of Global Service. Sookmyung Women's University)
  • 김혁준 (한국지식재산연구원 경제산업연구실 ) ;
  • 한유진 (숙명여자대학교 글로벌서비스학부)
  • Received : 2024.01.20
  • Accepted : 2024.04.05
  • Published : 2024.04.30

Abstract

Recently, the importance of trademarks as a core resource of corporate competitiveness to protect and differentiate products and services is increasing. Global companies are focusing hard to secure trademark rights to manage brands that reflect their core values and to respond to increasingly frequent trademark disputes, while start-ups and individuals are working hard to secure trademark to run stable businesses and attract investment funds. Meanwhile, this study conducts an empirical analysis to identify the relationship between the brand and business strategy of domestic venture startups. The analysis data used was the response data of 2,230 corporate companies from the 2021 Venture Business Precision Survey, and the propensity score matching method, structural equation model analysis, and binomial logit analysis were used as analysis methods. As a result of the analysis, it was confirmed that domestic venture startups' trademark ownership does not make a significant difference in terms of the level of business strategy. This was confirmed to be because the brands of domestic venture start-ups mainly advance their business strategies only through the internal competency process, while the advancement of business strategies through the external competency process is very minimal. Meanwhile, it was confirmed that the level of cost advantage strategy among the business strategy levels of venture start-ups strengthens the tendency to hold trademarks, indicating that the higher the completeness of the cost advantage level, the more likely it is to expand trademark ownership for stable sales and supply of products and services through trademark ownership and to convert to high value-added in the future.

최근 제품과 서비스를 보호하고 차별화하기 위한 기업 경쟁력의 핵심 자원으로서 상표의 중요성이 증대되고 있다. 글로벌 기업들은 자사의 핵심가치가 투영된 브랜드 관리와 점차 빈발하고 있는 상표권 분쟁 대응을 위해 상표권 확보에 매진하고 있고, 창업기업과 개인은 안정적 사업 영위와 투자금 유치를 위해 상표권 확보에 매진하고 있다. 이러한 가운데 본 연구는 국내 벤처창업기업의 상표와 비즈니스 전략간 연관성 규명을 위한 실증분석을 실시한다. 분석데이터는 2021년 벤처기업정밀실태조사 중 2,230개의 법인기업 응답데이터가 활용되었고, 분석방법으로는 성향점수매칭법, 구조방정식모형분석, 이항로짓분석이 활용되었다. 분석 결과 국내 벤처창업기업의 상표 보유는 비즈니스 전략의 수준 측면에서 큰 차이를 만들지는 않는 것으로 확인되었다. 이는 국내 벤처창업기업의 상표는 주로 내부역량화 과정을 통해서만 비즈니스 전략을 고도화하는 반면 외부역량화 과정을 통한 비즈니스 전략 고도화는 매우 미미하기 때문인 것으로 확인되었다. 한편 벤처창업기업의 비즈니스 전략 수준 중 원가우위전략 수준이 상표 보유성향을 강화하는 것으로 확인되었는데 이는 원가우위수준의 완성도가 높아 지면 높아질수록 상표보유를 통해 제품·서비스의 안정적 판매·공급을 위해, 그리고 향후 고부가가치화로 전환하기 위해 상표보유를 확대하는 경향이 있음을 보여준다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 특허청의 2023년 지식재산 기본연구 사업의 일환으로 수행됨

References

  1. Allegrezza, S., & Guarda-Rauchs, A.(1999). The determinants of trademark deposits: An econometric investigation. Economie Appliquee: Archives de l'Institut de Sciences Mathematiques et Economiques Appliquees, 52(2), 51-68.
  2. Appelt, S.(2009). Early entry and trademark protection: An empirical examination of barriers to generic entry. DRUID Conference 2009.
  3. Bae, S. C., Park, J. T., Oh, S. J., Jung, T. H., Choi, H. S., Jung, S., & Lee, S. S.(2013). A Survey and analysis of the trademark management activity in the domestic companies. Korea Intellectual Property Office, Retrieved from https://www.korea.kr/common/download.do?tblKey=EDN&fileId=209052.
  4. Bei, X.(2019). Trademarks, specialized complementary assets, and the external sourcing of innovation. Research Policy, 48(9), 103709.
  5. Barroso, A., Giarratana, M. S., & Pasquini, M.(2019). Product portfolio performance in new foreign markets: The EU trademark dual system. Research Policy, 48(1), 11-21.
  6. Block, J. H., De Vries, G., Schumann, J. H., & Sandner, P.(2014). Trademarks and venture capital valuation. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(4), 525-542.
  7. Block, J. H., Fisch, C. O., Hahn, A., & Sandner, P.(2015). Why do SMEs file trademarks? Insights from firms in innovative industries. Research Policy, 44(10), 1915-1930.
  8. Cao, Y., Ren, S., & Du, M.(2022). Strategic trademark management: A systematic literature review and prospects for future research. Journal of Brand Management, 29(1), 435-453.
  9. Castaldi, C.(2018). To trademark or not to trademark: The case of the creative and cultural industries. Research Policy, 47(3), 606-616.
  10. Castaldi, C., & Giarratana, M. S.(2018). Diversification, branding, and performance of professional service firms. Journal of Service Research, 21(3), 353-364.
  11. Castaldi, C., Block, J., & Flikkema, M. J.(2020). Why and when do firms trademark? Bridging perspectives from industrial organization, innovation and entrepreneurship. Industry and Innovation, 27(1-2), 1-10.
  12. De Vries, G., Pennings, E., Block, J. H., & Fisch, C.(2017). Trademark or patent? The effects of market concentration, customer type and venture capital financing on start-ups' initial IP applications. Industry and Innovation, 24(4), 325-345.
  13. Duygun, M., Sena, V., & Shaban, M.(2016). Trademarking activities and total factor productivity: Some evidence for British commercial banks using a metafrontier approach. Journal of Banking & Finance, 72(11), S70-S80.
  14. Ertekin, L., Sorescu, A., & Houston, M. B.(2018). Hands off my brand! The financial consequences of protecting brands through trademark infringement lawsuits. Journal of Marketing, 82(5), 45-65.
  15. Fink, C., Helmers, C., & Ponce, C. J.(2018). Trademark squatters: Theory and evidence from Chile. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 59(7), 340-371.
  16. Flikkema, M. J., de Man, A. P., & Wolters, M. J. J.(2010). New Trademark Registration as an Indicator of Innovation: Results of an Explorative Study of Benelux Trademark Data. Serie Research Memoranda, 0009.
  17. Flikkema, M., de Man, A. P., & Castaldi, C.(2014). Are trademark counts a valid indicator of innovation? Results of an in-depth study of new Benelux trademarks filed by SMEs. Industry and Innovation, 21(4), 310-331.
  18. Flikkema, M., Castaldi, C., de Man, A. P., & Seip, M.(2019). Trademarks' relatedness to product and service innovation: A branding strategy approach. Research Policy, 48(6), 1340-1353.
  19. Fosfuri, A., & Giarratana, M. S.(2009). Masters of war: Rivals' product innovation and new advertising in mature product markets. Management Science, 55(2), 181-191.
  20. Gotsch, M., & Hipp, C.(2012). Measurement of innovation activities in the knowledge-intensive services industry: A trademark approach. Service Industries Journal, 32(13), 2167-2184.
  21. Govindarajan, V., & Fisher, J.(1990). Strategy, control systems, and resource sharing: Effects on business-unit performance. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 259-285.
  22. Greenhalgh, C., & Longland, M.(2001). Intellectual property in UK firms: Creating intangible assets and distributing the benefits via wages and jobs. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 63(s1), 671-696.
  23. Greenhalgh, C., & Longland, M.(2005). Running to stand still? - The value of R&D, patents and trade marks in innovating manufacturing firms. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 12(3), 307-328.
  24. Greenhalgh, C., Rogers, M., Schautschick, P., & Sena, V.(2011). Trade mark incentives, London: Report for the UK Intellectual Property Office.
  25. Greenhalgh, C., & Rogers, M.(2012). Trade marks and performance in services and manufacturing firms: Evidence of Schumpeterian competition through innovation. Australian Economic Review, 45(1), 50-76.
  26. Griffiths, W., Jensen, P. H., & Webster, E.(2011). What creates abnormal profits?. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 58(3), 323-346.
  27. Hill, C. W. L., & Hult, G. T. M.(2017). International business: Competing in the global marketplace. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
  28. Jensen, P. H., & Webster, E.(2009). Another look at the relationship between innovation proxies. Australian Economic Papers, 48(3), 252-269.
  29. Joreskog, K. G.(1973). A general method for estimating a linear structural equation system, In A. S. Goldberger & O. D. Duncan(Eds.), Structural equation models in th social sciences, New York: Seminar Press.
  30. Kang, K. N.(2022). Start-up and trademark application activities. Innovation Studies, 18(2), 211-223.
  31. Kang, T. W., Lee, Y., & Lee Y. S.(2018). The impact of self-efficacy on job engagement and job performance of SME's members: SEM-ANN analysis. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 13(6), 155-166.
  32. Kim, W. P.(2017). Structual equation model analysis. Seoul: Wisein Company.
  33. Kim, H. J.(2022). Determinants and economic effects of Korean companies' trademark applications. Basic Research, Korea Institute of Intellectual Property. Retrieved from https://www.kiip.re.kr/download.do?attach_no=8908&bd_gb=report.
  34. Kim, J. H., Kim, M. K., & Hong, S. H.(2009). Writing a paper with structural equation model. Seoul: Commbooks.
  35. Krasnikov, A., Mishra, S., & Orozco, D.(2009). Evaluating the financial impact of branding using trademarks: A framework and empirical evidence. Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 154-166.
  36. Lee, E. A., Seo, J., & Shim, Y. S.(2019). A study on the entrepreneurial orientation and the performance of startups: The mediating effects of technological orientation and social capital. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 14(2), 47-59.
  37. Lee, M., & Lee, S.(2017). Identifying new business opportunities from competitor intelligence: An integrated use of patent and trademark databases. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 119(6), 170-183.
  38. Landes, W. M., & Posner, R. A.(1987). Trademark law : An economic perspective. Journal of Law and Economics, 30(2), 265-309.
  39. Lyalkov, S., Carmona, M., Congregado, E., Millan, A., & Millan. J. M.(2019). Trademarks and their association with Kirznerian entrepreneurs. Industry and Innovation, 27(1-2), 155-183.
  40. Malmberg, C.(2005). Trademarks statistics as innovation indicator?: A micro study. Lund University.
  41. Mendonҫa, S., Pereira, T. S., & Godinho, M. M.(2004). Trademarks as an indicator of innovation and industrial change. Research Policy, 33(9), 1385-1404.
  42. Meyer, T. A., Tinney, C. H., & Tinney, T. J.(1985). Guidelines for corporate trademark licensing. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2(3), 196-204.
  43. Millot, V.(2012). Trade mark strategies and innovative behaviour. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Strasbourg.
  44. Ministry of SMEs and Startups(2022). Survey of Korean Venture Firms. Ministry of SMEs and Startups, Retrieved from https://mdis.kostat.go.kr.
  45. Ramello, G. B., & Silva, F.(2006). Appropriating signs and meaning: The elusive economics of trademark. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(6), 937-963.
  46. Reitzig, M.(2004). Strategic management of intellectual property. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(3), 35-40.
  47. Rogers, M., Greenhalgh, C., & Helmers, C.(2007). An analysis of the association between the use of intellectual property by UK SMEs and subsequent performance. Report for UK Intellectual Property Office, Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228472779.
  48. Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B.(1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrica, 70(1), 41-55.
  49. Sandner, P. G.(2009). Identification of trademark filing strategies: Creating, hedging, modernizing, and extending brands. Trademark Rep, 99(5), 1257-1298.
  50. Sandner, P., & Block, J.(2011). The market value of R&D, patents, and trademark. Research Policy, 40(7), 969-985.
  51. Schautschick, P., & Greenhalgh, C.(2016). Empirical studies of trade marks-the existing economic literature. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 25(4), 358-390.
  52. Schmoch, U.(2003). Service marks as novel innovation indicator. Research Evaluation, 12(2), 149-156.
  53. Schmoch, U., & Gauch, S.(2009). Service marks as indicators for innovation in knowledge-based services. Research Evaluation, 18(4), 323-335.
  54. Somaya, D.(2012). Patent strategy and management: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1084-1114.
  55. Seip, M., Castaldi, C., Flikkema, M. J., & de Man, A.(2018). The timing of trademark application in innovation processes. Technovation, 72-73, 34-45.
  56. Semadeni, M.(2006). Minding your distance: How management consulting firms use service marks to position competitively. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 169-187.
  57. Srinivasan, R., Lilien, G. L., & Rangaswamy, A.(2008). Survival of high tech firms: the effects of diversity of product-market portfolios, patents, and trademarks. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25(2), 119-128.
  58. Stone, M., & Trebbien, J. D.(2019). Brand licensing: A powerful marketing tool for today's shopping battlefield. Journal of Brand Strategy, 8(3), 207-217.
  59. Teece, D. J.(1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285-305.
  60. von Graevenitz, G.(2009). Which reputations does a brand owner need? Evidence from trade mark opposition. CELS 2009 4th Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Paper.
  61. Zheng, R.(2023). A study on the apportionment jurisprudence in intellectual property right infringement damages calculations: Focusing on patents (including technology trade secrets), trademarks and copyrights. Doctoral dissertation, Sungkyunkwan University.