지식경영연구 (Knowledge Management Research)

한국지식경영학회 (The Knowledge Management Society of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

메타버스의 가상환경과 텍스트 강화기법을 활용한 외국어 학습 효과

The Effectiveness of Foreign Language Learning in Virtual Environments and with Textual Enhancement Techniques in the Metaverse

  • 투고 : 2024.01.17
  • 심사 : 2024.03.22
  • 발행 : 2024.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구의 목적은 가상환경에서의 다양한 환경 변화를 통한 외국어 학습 효과를 조사하는 것이다. 이를 위해 가상환경 공간을 교실과 식료품점으로 구분한 후, 여기에 각각 세 종류의 자막으로 구성된 텍스트 강화기법을 적용한 몰입형 가상현실 영어학습 콘텐츠를 직접 제작한 후 학습 효과를 비교했다. 실험은 2 × 3 혼합요인설계로 구성됐으며, 가상환경 공간은 실험자 내 요인으로 실험참여자는 학습 공간에 따라 처치 수준이 다른 두 개의 영상에 노출됐고, 텍스트 강화기법은 실험자 간 요인으로 실험참여자는 텍스트 강화기법에 따라 처치 수준이 다른 세 개의 자막 중 무작위로 한 개의 자막에 노출됐다. 가상환경 공간과 텍스트 강화기법에 따른 상호작용 효과 분석 결과, 프레즌스가 통계적으로 유의미한 차이를 보였다. 공간의 주효과를 살펴본 결과, 플로우와 학습 전-후 가상현실 교육 태도에 대해 통계적으로 유의미한 차이가 있었고, 텍스트 강화기법의 주효과를 분석한 결과, 플로우, 가상현실 학습 이용의도, 학습 만족도와 학습 자신감에서 통계적으로 유의미한 차이가 있었다. 결과적으로 가상현실 공간의 제공 환경에 따라 학습자의 교육에 대한 몰입과 태도 차이를 확인할 수 있었고, 자막 제공 방식에 따라 다양한 교육 효과의 차이가 있음을 확인할 수 있었다. 이는 가상환경에서 외국어 교육의 효과를 긍정적으로 확인한 것인데, 학교와 학원 등에서 가상환경을 활용한 영어학습 서비스의 가능성을 제시하고, 다양한 가상환경의 변화에 따라 교육 효과가 달라질 수 있다는 함의를 제공한다.

This study investigates the effectiveness of foreign language learning through diverse treatments in virtual settings, particularly by differentiating virtual environments with three textual enhancement techniques. A 2 × 3 mixed-factorial design was used, treating virtual environments as within-subject factors and textual enhancement techniques as between-subject factors. Participants experienced two videos, each in different virtual learning environments with one of the random textual enhancement techniques. The results showed that the interaction between different virtual environments and textual enhancement techniques had a statistically significant impact on presence among groups. In examining main effects of virtual environments, significant differences were observed in flow and attitude toward pre-post learning. Also, main effects of textual enhancements notably influenced flow, intention to use, learning satisfaction, and learning confidence. This study highlights the potential of Metaverse in foreign language learning, suggesting that learner experiences and effects vary with different virtual environments.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 2021년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 인문사회분야 중견연구자지원사업의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NRF-2021S1A5A2A01062901)

참고문헌

  1. 소요환 (2016). 웹 3D 와 가상현실 시뮬레이션 학습의 사용성 평가 비교분석. 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 16(10), 719-729. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2016.16.10.719
  2. 신민철, 정동훈 (2020). 가상현실 운동게임의 화면 속도에 따른 사용자 반응. 한국게임학회논문지, 20(5), 41-51.
  3. 이명희 (2012). 외모 장식이 여성의 전문직 이미지에 미치는 영향. 한국의상디자인학회지, 14(4), 1-16.
  4. 이상만, 이국용 (2008). 온라인 게임 이용자 충성도에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구: 플로우 경험, 태도, 만족을 중심으로. e-비즈니스연구, 9(3), 84-108.
  5. 이석인 (2006). 모바일게임의 고객 충성도 영향요인에 관한 실증 연구. 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 6(10), 99-106.
  6. 이수희, 김맹선 (2015). 호텔기업의 온라인 교육 환경에서 학습자 요인이 학습만족도 및 직무수행능력에 미치는 영향. 관광레저연구, 27(12), 443-462.
  7. 이항, 김준환 (2010). 대학의 온라인 커뮤니티 특성이 커뮤니티몰입과 재이용의도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. e-비즈니스연구, 11(4), 165-185. https://doi.org/10.15719/GEBA.11.4.201011.165
  8. 이현지, 정동훈 (2012). 스마트폰 게임센서에 따른 상호작용성과 플로우, 태도 그리고 이용의도에 관한 연구. 한국방송학보, 26(1), 126-166.
  9. 이혜진, 정동훈 (2019). 가상현실 영상의 깊이감이 사용자의 지각 된 특성, 프레즌스, 피로도에 미치는 영향. 한국방송학보, 33(2), 184-216. https://doi.org/10.22876/KAB.2019.33.2.006
  10. 임희주 (2019). 교양영어수업에서 가상현실 (VR) 앱 활용에 대한 연구. 교양교육연구, 13(5), 349-369.
  11. 정동훈 (2009). 게임 상호작용성 수준이 심리상태에 미치는 영향. 한국게임학회논문지, 9(5), 3-11.
  12. 정동훈 (2017). (혼자 공부하는) 가상현실 개념사전:VR도 모르면서 포켓몬을 잡는다고? 서울: 21세기북스.
  13. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84(5), 888-918.
  14. Alfadil, M. (2020). Effectiveness of virtual reality game in foreign language vocabulary acquisition. Computers & Education, 153, 103893.
  15. Al-Hebaish, S. M. (2012). The correlation between general self-confidence and academic achievement in the oral presentation course. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 2(1), 60-65.
  16. Amprasi, E., Vernadakis, N., Zetou, E., & Antoniou, P. (2022). Effect of a full immersive virtual reality intervention on selective attention in children. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 565-582.
  17. Bird, S. A., & Williams, J. N. (2002). The effect of bimodal input on implicit and explicit memory: An investigation into the benefits of within-language subtitling. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23(4), 509-533.
  18. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
  19. Chang, H. H., & Wang, I. C. (2008). An investigation of user communication behavior in computer mediated environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 2336-2356.
  20. Chen, J. C. (2016). The crossroads of English language learners, task-based instruction, and 3D multi-user virtual learning in Second Life. Computers & Education, 102, 152-171.
  21. Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 149-210.
  22. Csikszentmihalyi, M.(1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety: The experience of play in work and Games. SF: Jossey Bass.
  23. Csikszentmihalyi, M.(1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention(1st ed). NY: Harper Collins Publishers.
  24. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  25. Dhimolea, T. K., Kaplan-Rakowski, R., & Lin, L. (2022). A systematic review of research on high-immersion virtual reality for language learning. TechTrends, 66(5), 810-824. 
  26. Dornyei, Z. (1994). Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 78(3), 273-284.
  27. Ellis, N. C. (1996). Working memory in the acquisition of vocabulary and syntax: Putting language in good order. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 49(1), 234-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755604
  28. Figueiredo, A. D. & Afonso, A. P. (2006). Context and learning: A philosophical framework. In Figueiredo, A. D. & Afonso, A. P. (Eds.), Managing Learning in Virtual Settings: The Role of Context. Hershey, PA, USA: Information Science Publishing
  29. Fullerton, G., & Taylor, S. (2002). Mediating, interactive, and non-linear effects in service quality and satisfaction with services research. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'administration, 19(2), 124-136.
  30. Ghani, J. A., & Deshpande, S. P. (1994). Task characteristics and the experience of optimal flow in human-computer interaction. Journal of Psychology, 128(4), 381-391.
  31. Gilmore, A. (2007). Authentic materials and authenticity in foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 40(2), 97-118. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004144
  32. Guichon, N., & McLornan, S. (2008). The effects of multimodality on L2 learners: Implications for CALL resource design. System, 36(1), 85-93.
  33. Heidari-Shahreza, M. A., & Tavakoli, M. (2016). The effects of repetition and L1 lexicalization on incidental vocabulary acquisition by Iranian EFL learners. The Language Learning Journal, 44(1), 17-32.
  34. Hidayati, T., & Diana, S. (2019). Students' motivation to learn English using mobile applications: The case of Duolingo and Hello English. Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies, 6(2), 189-213.
  35. Huang, H. M., Rauch, U., & Liaw, S. S. (2010). Investigating learners' attitudes toward virtual reality learning environments: Based on a constructivist approach. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1171-1182.
  36. Hulstijn, J. H., Hollander, M., & Greidanus, T. (1996). Incidental vocabulary learning by advanced foreign language students: The influence of marginal glosses, dictionary use, and reoccurrence of unknown words. The Modern Language Journal, 80(3), 327-339.
  37. Jensen, L., & Konradsen, F. (2018). A review of the use of virtual reality head-mounted displays in education and training. Education and Information Technologies, 23, 1515-1529.
  38. Jin, Y. J., & Yoo, I. W. (2019). Why communicative language teaching has yet to work in Korea: Exploring teachers' viewpoints. Journal of Asia TEFL, 16(4), 1332-1347.
  39. Lan, Y. J. (2014). Does Second Life improve Mandarin learning by overseas Chinese students? Language Learning & Technology, 18(2), 36-56.
  40. Lan, Y. J. (2015). Contextual EFL learning in a 3D virtual environment. Language Learning & Technology, 19(2), 16-31.
  41. Lang, A. (2000). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication, 50(1), 46-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02833.x
  42. Lang, A. (2006). Using the limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing to design effective cancer communication messages. Journal of Communication, 56(1), 57-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00283.x
  43. Leow, R. P. (2001). Do learners notice enhanced forms while interacting with the L2?: An online and offline study of the role of written input enhancement in L2 reading. Hispania, 84(3), 496-509. https://doi.org/10.2307/3657810
  44. Lessiter, J., Freeman, J., Keogh, E., & Davidoff, J. (2001). A cross-media presence questionnaire: The ITC-Sense of Presence Inventory. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 10(3), 282-297.
  45. Lin, J. W., Duh, H. B. L., Parker, D. E., Abi-Rached, H., & Furness, T. A. (2002). Effects of field of view on presence, enjoyment, memory, and simulator sickness in a virtual environment. In Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality 2002, Orlando, USA, 164-171.
  46. Massimini, F., & Carli, M. (1988). The systematic assessment of flow in daily experience. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness. NY: Cambridge University Press.
  47. Mayer, R. E. (2014). Principles based on social cues in multimedia learning: Personalization, Voice, Image, and Embodiment Principles. In Mayer, R. E. (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  48. Mulligan, N. W. (2008). Attention and memory. Learning and memory: A Comprehensive Reference, 2, 7-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012370509-9.00134-0
  49. Nation, I. S., & Webb, S. A. (2011). Researching and analyzing vocabulary. MA: Heinle, Cengage Learning.
  50. Oliver, R. L. (1993). A conceptual model of service quality and service satisfaction: Comparative goals, different concepts. Advances in Service Marketing and Management, 2, 65-85.
  51. Oliver, R. L. (2014). Satisfaction: A behavioral perspective on the consumer: A behavioral perspective on the consumer. NY: Routledge.
  52. Overstreet, M. (1998). Text enhancement and content familiarity: The focus of learner attention. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 229-258.
  53. Pyun, D. O., Kim, J. S., Cho, H. Y., & Lee, J. H. (2014). Impact of affective variables on Korean as a foreign language learners' oral achievement. System, 47, 53-63.
  54. Rubio, F. (2021). Self-esteem and foreign language learning. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  55. Shen, W. W. (2003). Current trends of vocabulary teaching and learning strategies for EFL settings. Feng Chia Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 7, 187-224.
  56. Taylor, S. A., & Baker, T. L. (1994). An assessment of the relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction in the formation of consumers' purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing, 70(2), 163-178.
  57. Wei, R., & Fan, L. (2022). On-Screen Texts in Audiovisual Input for L2 Vocabulary Learning: A Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 904523.
  58. White, J. (1998). Getting the learners' attention: A typographical input enhancement study. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  59. Witmer, B. G., & Singer, M. J. (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence, 7(3), 225-240. 
  60. ISPR (2023). https://ispr.info/