한국건설관리학회논문집 (Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management)

  • 제25권2호
  • /
  • Pages.23-35
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 2005-6095(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2465-9703(eISSN)
한국건설관리학회 (Korea Institute of Construction Engineering and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

건설공사 대가지급방식의 의사결정 영향요인에 관한 연구 - 미국 연방조달규정에 따른 미국 국방성의 정액계약과 실비정산계약을 중심으로 -

A Study of the Influencing Factors for Decision Making on Construction Contract Types : Focused on DoD Construction Acquisitions with Firm Fixed Price and Cost Reimbursable in FAR

  • 손영훈 (아주대학교 건축공학 (한국토지주택공사 경기북부지역본부)) ;
  • 김경래 (아주대학교 건축학과 )
  • Son, Young-Hoon (Architectural Engineering, Ajou University (Korea Land & Housing Corporation) ) ;
  • Kim, Kyung-Rai (Department of Architecture, Ajou University)
  • 투고 : 2023.09.06
  • 심사 : 2024.01.04
  • 발행 : 2024.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 2008년부터 2022년까지 미국 국방성 육군공병대 건설발주데이터 2,406건에 대하여 미국 연방조달규정 16.104 등에 따른 12개 영향요인과 대가지급방식을 중심으로 한 건설계약유형과의 상관관계를 분석하였다. 본 연구는 독립변수인 12개 영향요인을 4개 특성 영역별로 각각 3개씩의 영향요인으로 그룹화하였다. 데이터셑의 모든 계약유형은 정액계약(FFP)와 실비정산계약(CRC)의 2개 유형으로 분류 후 각각 종속변수로 설정하였다. 연구 결과 대부분의 미국 국방성 발주 건설계약유형은 정액계약이 대다수를 차지하는 것으로 나타났다. 로지스틱 회귀분석 및 AHP 기법을 활용한 전문가 설문조사결과에 따른 상대적 중요도 분석 결과 일반적으로 알려진 바와 같이 과업의 불확실성 및 과업의 복잡성과 같은 독립변수는 실비정산계약의 가능성을 증가시키는 것으로 나타났다. 시장 내 업체의 수는 실비정산계약과 정액계약간의 의사결정에 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 한편 AHP분석결과 상위 3개 영향요인, 즉 비용회계기준의 적합성, 과업의 긴급성 및 비용 분석 결과의 p값은 이항 로지스틱 회귀분석 결과 0.05를 초과하여 특히 대가지급방식을 중심으로 한 건설계약유형의 의사결정에 영향을 미치는가에 대한 유의미한 결론을 내릴 수 없었다. 이는 전문가 설문조사의 응답자 중 대부분이 주한미군기지이전사업의 경험을 갖고 있다는 사실에 일정부분 기인한다고 보인다. 더 나아가 건설계약의 영향요인은 일반적으로 알려진 상식과는 달리 작용하는 것으로 일부분 관찰되었다. 결론적으로 대가지급방식을 중심으로 한 건설프로젝트의 계약방식 의사결정을 위해서는 본 연구에서 제시한 4개 영역 12개 영향요인에 대한 고려가 필수적이라고 할 수 있다.

This study analyzed the correlation between each of the 12 influencing factors in FAR 16.04 and the decision-making process for construction contract types, using data from a total of 2,406 DoD Construction Acquisitions spanning from 2008 to 2022. The study considered 12 independent variables, grouped into 4 Characteristics with 3 factors each. Meanwhile, all other contract types were categorized into two types: Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) and Cost-Reimbursement Contract (CRC), which served as the dependent variables. The findings revealed that FFP contracts significantly dominated in terms of acquisition volume. In line with prevailing beliefs, logistic data analysis and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) analysis of Relative Weights from Experts' Survey demonstrated that independent variables like Uncertainty of the Scope of Work and Complexity found out to be increasing the likelihood of selecting CRC. The number of contractors in the market does indeed influence the possibilities of contract decision-making between CRC and FFP. Meanwhile, the p-values of the top 3 influencing factors on CRC from the AHP analysis-namely, Appropriateness of CAS, Project Urgency, and Cost Analysis-exceeded 0.05 in the binominal regression results, rendering it inconclusive whether they significantly influenced the construction contract type decision, particularly with respect to payment methods. This outcome partly results from the fact that a majority of respondents possessed specific experiences related to the USFK relocation project. Furthermore, influencing factors in construction projects behave differently than common beliefs suggest. As a result, it is imperative to consider the 12 influencing factors categorized into 4 Characteristics areas before establishing acquisition strategies for targeted construction projects.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Brown, T.L., and Potoski, M. (2005). "Transaction Costs and Contracting; The Practitioner Perspective." Public Performance & Management Review, 28(3), pp. 326-351.
  2. Cibinic, J. Jr., and Nash, R.C. Jr. (2004). Cost-Reimbursement Contracting 3rd Edition, The George Washington University, Washington D.C., pp. 117-130.
  3. Cibinic, J. Jr., Nash, R.C. Jr., and Nagle, J.F. (2006). Administration of Government Contracts 4th Edition, The George Washington University, Washington D.C., pp. 3-7.
  4. Cox, D.R. (1958). "The Regression Analysis of Binary Sequence." Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological), 20(2), pp. 215-242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1958.tb00292.x
  5. Dixon, M., Apte U., and Rendon, R. (2015) "Big Data Analysis of Contractor Performance Information for Services Acquisitions in DoD: A Proof of Concept." Acquisition Research Program Sponsored Report Series, Naval Postgraduate School, NPS-CM-15-127, pp. 404-406.
  6. Giguere, J.Y., (2017). "Federal Spending Data On A Deadline: The Development Of USASPENDING.GOV." IAC Online Journal CIO and Digital Innovation, pp. 88-91.
  7. Hefetz, A., and Warner, M.E. (2012). "Contracting or public delivery? The importance of service, market and management characteristics." Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(2), pp. 289-317. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur006
  8. Kahneman, D., and Tversky A. (1979). "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk." Econometrica, The Econometric Society, 47(2), pp. 263-292. https://web.archive.org/web/20100331104625/http://www.princeton.edu/~kahneman/docs/Publications/prospect_theory.pdf 100331104625/http://www.princeton.edu/~kahneman/docs/Publications/prospect_theory.pdf
  9. Kim, Y.W., and Brown, T.L. (2012). "Importance of Contract Design." Public Administration Review, 72(5), pp. 687-696. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02537.x
  10. Kim, Y.W., and Brown, A.R.T., (2016). "Impact of Product Characteristics and Market Conditions on Contract Type : Use of Fixed-Price Versus Cost-Reimbursement Contracts in the U.S. Department of Defense." Public Performance & Management Review, Naval Postgraduate School, 39, pp. 783-813. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2015.1137765
  11. Lee, T.W. (2016). "Policy Directions for Establishing a Pricing Guide for Construction Engineering Service in South Korea." D. Eng. Dissertation, Yonsei University, Korea.
  12. Lee, Y.S., and Hwang, B.G. (2007). "Impact of Contract types on Construction Project Performance-Cost Reimbursable and Lump Sum." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 8(2), pp. 155-163.
  13. Moree, W. (2013). "The Influence of Different Contract Types on the Effectiveness of Owner-Contractor Relationships in Construction Project." M.S. Dissertation, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands.
  14. Muller, R., and Turner, J.R. (2005). "The Impact of Principal-Agent Relationship and Contract Type on Communication Between Project Owner and Manager." International Journal of Project Management, APM (Association for Project Management) & IPMA (International Project Management Association), 23, pp. 398-403.
  15. Pearson, K., and Henrici, F.R.S. (1894). "Contribution to the Mathematical Theory of Evolution." Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Royal Society, 185 pp. 71-110.
  16. Spiller, P.T. (2008). "An Institutional Theory of Public Contracts: Regulatory Implications." NBER Working Paper Series, National Bureau of Economic Research, 14152, pp. 5-8.
  17. Tate, W.L., Ellram, L.M., Bals, L., Hartmann, E., and Valk, W.V.D. (2010). "An Agency Theory Perspective on the Purchase of Marketing Services." Industrial Marketing Management , APM (Association for Project Management) & IPMA (International Project Management Association), 39, pp. 806-819.
  18. Turban, E., Aronson, J.E., and Liang, T.P.(2005). Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems 7th Edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, pp. 94-97, 377.
  19. Williams. K., Sattineni, A., and Bugg, R.A. (2018). "Correlation between Contract Type Selection and Cost Growth in U.S. Army Corps Construction Projects." Proceedings of the Creative Construction conference 2018, p. 394.
  20. Wolters Kluwer Legal (2008). FAR Federal Acquisition Regulation, Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, Chicago IL, U.S.A.