한국문헌정보학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science)

한국문헌정보학회 (Korean Society For Library And Information Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

대학 비대면 강의 플랫폼 이용성이 강의 만족도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구

A Study on the Effect of University Online Learning Platform Usability on Course Satisfaction

  • 채현수 (연세대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 이지연 (연세대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • 투고 : 2024.01.22
  • 심사 : 2024.02.09
  • 발행 : 2024.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 비대면 강의 수강 경험이 있는 학부생 및 대학원생을 대상으로 비대면 강의 플랫폼에 대한 인식과 만족도를 파악하고, 비대면 강의 플랫폼 설계 및 개발 과정에서 고려해야 할 이용성 요인이 강의 만족도에 미치는 영향 관계를 검증하는 데에 목적이 있다. 문헌조사를 통해 비대면 강의 플랫폼 개발 과정에서 고려해야 할 주요 요인을 정리하고 연구모형을 수립하였다. 이를 바탕으로 대학구성원을 대상으로 대학 비대면 강의 플랫폼 이용자 인터페이스 설계 원칙 충족도, 플랫폼 이용성, 플랫폼 만족도, 비대면 강의 만족도 등에 대한 인식을 묻는 설문조사를 수행하였다. 설문조사 응답 분석을 통하여 변수 간의 인과관계를 검증하고 모형화하였다. 학습자 유형 및 비대면 강의 방식 유형별로도 동일한 모형 적용이 가능함을 확인하였다. 본 연구는 학습자의 평가 결과를 토대로 플랫폼의 이용자 인터페이스 설계 원칙 충족도가 플랫폼 활용 비대면 강의 만족도에 영향을 미칠 수 있음을 검증하였다는 점에서 의의가 있다. 본 연구에서 제안한 연구모형이 향후 비대면 강의 환경 개선과 발전에 기여할 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

The study aims to understand undergraduates' and graduate students' perceptions and satisfaction with online learning platforms and to verify the relationship between usability factors and satisfaction with online courses. The literature review facilitated the summarization of major factors to be considered in the online learning platform development process and established the research model. The follow-up survey verified the perceptions of university constituents regarding the fulfillment of the university online learning platforms' user interface principles, platforms' usability, satisfaction with platforms, and satisfaction with online courses. Causal relationships between variables were tested and modeled by analyzing survey results. We also confirmed that the same model can be applied to different types of learners and various types of online learning methods. This study is significant in verifying that the fulfillment of the platforms' user interface design principles can affect satisfaction with online courses using the platforms based on learners' evaluation results. We expect that the research model proposed in this study can contribute to the improvement and development of online learning environments in the future.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 2022년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임 (NRF-2022S1A5C2A03093597).

참고문헌

  1. Baek, Seung-Hiey & Kang, Seung-Chan (2021). Latent profile analysis of K-university's non-face-to-face lectures satisfaction. Journal of Practical Engineering Education, 13(1), 51-59. https://doi.org/10.14702/JPEE.2021.051
  2. Chae, Hyun Soo & Lee, Jee Yeon (2012). The development of user interface design principles for improving the usability of university course management system. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 29(3), 123-144. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2012.29.3.123
  3. Do, Jaewoo (2020). An investigation of design constraints in the process of converting face-to-face course into online course. Journal of Education & Culture, 26(2), 153-173. https://doi.org/10.24159/joec.2020.26.2.153
  4. Han, Ga-Young & Jo, Seong-Chan (2021). A study on the effect of learner-instructor interaction on the satisfaction of non-face-to-face music class in university's non-face-to-face music class: focusing on the mediating effect of teaching presence. Korean Journal of Arts Education, 19(1), 53-68.
  5. Hong, Seongyoun & Ryu, Yeonjae (2020). Factors affecting college students' learning outcomes in non face-to-face environment during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 957-989. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.36.3.957
  6. Hwang, Yohan & Kim, Changsoo (2021). Perceptions toward non-face-to-face online class operations during the COVID-19 pandemic: focusing on university students' satisfaction and anxiety. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 29(1), 71-91. http://doi.org/10.24303/lakdoi.2021.29.1.71
  7. Kim, Eunhee & Choi, Hyoseon (2021). Needs analysis of instructors and learners to enhance educational effects of an e-learning platform in higher education. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 24(3), 33-44. http://doi.org/10.32431/kace.2021.24.3.004
  8. Kim, JaMee, Kim, Yong, & Lee, WonGyu (2010). A study for improvement of learning management system in distance education & training institutes. Journal of Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 11(4), 1411-1418. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2010.11.4.1411
  9. Kim, Kyunglee & Oh, Bangsil (2021). A comparative study on the non-face-to-face education: A university's students and faculty perspectives. The Journal of Research in Education, 34(2), 123-141.
  10. Kim, Namil (2020). A study on the satisfaction of non-face-to-face online class: focused on K university. The Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 21, 11(5), 1145-1157. http://dx.doi.org/10.22143/HSS21.11.5.83
  11. Lee, Myungsuk (2021). Educational use of a metaverse platform through the case of the hackathon class. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 24(6), 61-68. http://doi.org/10.32431/kace.2021.24.6.005
  12. Shin, Jun & Kim, Seung-In (2020). A study on the usability of university remote lecture: focusing on Zoom and Webex meetings. Journal of Digital Convergence, 18(10), 403-408. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2020.18.10.403
  13. Song, Sue-Yeon & Kim, Hankyoung (2020). Exploring factors influencing college students' satisfaction and persistent intention to take non-face-to-face courses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Asian Journal of Education, 21(4), 1099-1126. https://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2020.12.21.4.1099
  14. ISO. (2020). ISO 9241-110:2020 Ergonomics of Human-system Interaction - Part 110: Interaction Principles. Geneva: ISO.
  15. Jiang, H., Islam, A. A., Gu, X., & Spector, J. M. (2021). Online learning satisfaction in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: a regional comparison between Eastern and Western Chinese universities. Education and Information Technologies, 1-23.
  16. LaBarbera, R. (2013). The relationship between students' perceived sense of connectedness to the instructor and satisfaction in online courses. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 14(4), 209-220.
  17. Lee, J. W. (2010). Online support service quality, online learning acceptance, and student satisfaction. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 277-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.08.002
  18. Lund, A. M. (2001). Measuring usability with the use questionnaire. Usability Interface, 8(2), 3-6.
  19. Moodle (2020). History. Available at: https://docs.moodle.org/400/en/History
  20. Nielsen, J. (2020). 10 usability heuristics for user interface design. Nielsen Norman Group. Available: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics
  21. Pal, D. & Vanijja, V. (2020). Perceived usability evaluation of Microsoft Teams as an online learning platform during COVID-19 using system usability scale and technology acceptance model in India. Children and Youth Services Review, 119, 105535.
  22. Preacher, K. J. & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
  23. Sari, F. M. & Oktaviani, L. (2021). Undergraduate students' views on the use of online learning platform during COVID-19 pandemic. Teknosastik, 19(1), 41-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.33365/ts.v19i1.896
  24. She, L., Ma, L., Jan, A., Sharif Nia, H., & Rahmatpour, P. (2021). Online learning satisfaction during COVID-19 pandemic among Chinese university students: the serial mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 743936.
  25. Sheridan, K. & Kelly, M. A. (2010). The indicators of instructor presence that are important to students in online courses. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(4), 767-779.
  26. Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C., Cohen, M., Jacobs, S., Elmqvist, N., & Diakopoulos, N. (2018). Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-computer Interaction (Global edition). Harlow, Essex, England: Pearson.
  27. Sung, E. & Choi, J. (2021). Analyses on the perception's differences of online teaching activity according to the level of self-directed learning in higher education using the IPA technique. Educational Technology International, 22(1), 57-85. https://doi.org/10.23095/ETI.2021.22.1.057