Korean Journal of Culture and Social Issue (한국심리학회지 : 문화 및 사회문제)

Korean Psychological Association of Culture and Social Issues (한국문화및사회문제심리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Korean psychopathy: Based on the Korean Psychopathy Assessment Tool Validation Research

한국형 사이코패시: 국내 사이코패시 평가도구 타당화 연구를 바탕으로

  • 강민성 (영남대학교 심리학과) ;
  • 서동기 (한림대학교 사회과학대학 심리학과) ;
  • 서종한 (영남대학교 심리학과)
  • Received : 2023.10.12
  • Accepted : 2024.01.17
  • Published : 2024.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to conduct an exploratory investigation into Korean psychopathy by synthesizing the results of prior domestic research on the validation of psychopathy assessment tools. Domestic research on the validation of psychopathy scales has been constrained by limited research methodologies, bias toward male subjects, and the application of inappropriate factor structures. Furthermore, although discrepancies between the original scale and the Korean scale were identified regarding the factor structures through in construct validity research, discussion on the concept of Korean psychopathy has been limited. As a result, this study compared 16 domestic papers on the validation of psychopathy assessment tools along with 9 international foreign papers that addressed the factor structure of each original scale. By comparing the derived factor structures, items assigned to each factor, and omitted items from each study, the characteristics of Korean psychopathy were explored. The findings revealed that Korean psychopathy is recognizable from materialism, machiavellianism, and antisocial behavior and impulsivity. This study holds significance in synthesizing the outcomes of current domestic psychopathy validation research and offers a conceptual foundation to help understand Korean psychopathy.

본 연구는 현재까지의 국내 사이코패시 평가도구 타당화 연구의 결과를 종합하여 한국형 사이코패시에 대한 탐색적 연구를 수행하는 데 목적이 있다. 국내 사이코패시 척도 타당화 연구는 협소한 연구방법론, 남성 중심의 연구, 부적절한 요인구조 적용의 문제를 가진다. 또한, 구성타당도 연구에서 원척도의 요인구조와 차이가 있음이 확인되었으나 한국형 사이코패시에 대한 개념적 논의가 부족한 실정이다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 사이코패시 평가도구 타당화 연구를 한 국내 논문 16편과 각 원척도의 요인구조를 다룬 해외 논문 9편을 비교하였다. 각 연구에서 도출된 요인구조, 요인 별 할당된 문항, 탈락된 문항을 비교하여 국내 사이코패시가 가지는 특성을 탐색하였다. 결과적으로 한국형 사이코패시는 물질만능주의, 마키아벨리즘, 반사회성과 충동성 간 구분된 인식을 가지는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 국내의 모든 사이코패시 타당화 연구 결과를 종합하였다는 데에 의의를 가지며 한국형 사이코패시에 대한 개념적 토대를 제시한다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김나애, 이수정, 서종한 (2019). PCL-R 기반 사이코패스 비교문화연구. 교정담론, 13(1), 1-31.
  2. 박소향, 서종한 (2022). 레빈슨 사이코패시 자기보고 검사 (LSRP; Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale) 타당화 연구: ESEM 과 RSM 를 중심으로. 경찰학연구, 22(3), 189-229. https://doi.org/10.22816/POLSCI.2022.22.3.007
  3. 박소향, 박선영, 서종한 (2022). 우리 주변의 어두운 성격: Dirty Dozen 12 (DD12) 타당화를 중심으로. 한국범죄학, 16(3), 79-115.
  4. 박소향, 서종한, 홍정윤 (2022). 어두운 3 요소성격 측정 도구 (SD3) 의 타당화 연구: ESEM 과 DIF 분석을 중심으로. 치안정책연구, 36(4), 285-336.
  5. 박종철, 오현주, 이나희, 손하림, 이동귀, 배병훈 (2021). 한국판 어두운 성격 3 요소 단축형의 요인구조와 타당화 지표. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 34(3), 511-539. https://doi.org/10.24230/KJIOP.V34I3.511-539
  6. 박지선 (2014). 사이코패스에 관한 대중의 인식과 두려움. 한국범죄학, 8(2), 145-176.
  7. 서종한, 김경일 (2019). 한국형 사이코패스 원형성과 일반인의 인식에 관한 탐색적 연구. 교정담론, 13(3), 87-115.
  8. 서종한, 신강현, 김경일 (2018). 한국사회에서의 사이코패스 개념, 믿음, 태도에 관한 연구: 사이코패스성격장애종합평가 (CAPP)를 중심으로. 한국범죄학, 12(2), 5-28.
  9. 서종한, 이수정 (2017). 문항반응이론 기반 PCL-R 비교문화 연구: 한국문화에서의 사이코패시는?. 형사정책연구, 28(4), 47-87.
  10. 양해만, 조영호 (2018). 한국의 사회경제적 변화와 탈물질주의: 왜 한국인들은 여전히 물질주의적인가?. 한국정치학회보, 52(1), 75-100. https://doi.org/10.18854/KPSR.2018.52.1.004
  11. 유지혜, 설경옥 (2018). 한국판 물질주의척도의 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 24(3), 385-410. https://doi.org/10.20406/KJCS.2018.8.24.3.385
  12. 신지윤, 설경옥 (2022). 대학생의 외적 자기가치 수반성과 물질주의의 관계: 자기 불일치, 자존감 안정성의 매개효과. 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 28(3), 373-392. https://doi.org/10.20406/KJCS.2022.8.28.3.373
  13. 이수빈, 서종한 (2022a). 삼원 사이코패시 측정도구 (TriPM) 의 일반인 대상 타당화: 탐색적 구조방정식 모형 (ESEM) 을 중심으로. 보호관찰, 22(2), 107-139. https://doi.org/10.46983/kapps.2022.22.2.4
  14. 이수빈, 서종한 (2022b). 확장판 레빈슨 사이코패시 자기보고 검사 (E-LSRP) 타당화 연구. 한국범죄학, 16(3), 117-136. https://doi.org/10.29095/JKCA.16.3.5
  15. 이수빈, 이유경, 서종한 (2022). 삼원 사이코패시 측정도구 (TriPM; Triarchic psychopathy Model) 의 타당화. 경찰학연구, 22(2), 125-156. https://doi.org/10.22816/POLSCI.2022.22.2.005
  16. 이수정, 김재경 (2011). 정신병질 자기보고검사(SRPS) 의 타당도 연구. 한국심리학회지: 법, 2(1), 35-47.
  17. 이수정, 박혜영 (2009). 한국판 정신병질 성격평가 검사: 전문가 지침서. 학지사 심리검사연구소.
  18. 이수정, 고려진, 김재경 (2009). 한국판 Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) 의 구성타당도 연구. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 23(3), 57-71. https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2009.23.3.004
  19. 이수정, 이동길, 위희정 (2015). 한국인을 대상으로 한 PCL-R 2, 3, 4 요인 모형 타당성 검증. 한국범죄학, 9(2), 3-32.
  20. 이유경, 서종한 (2021a). 일반인 대상 자기보고식 사이코패시성격 종합평가 도구(CAPP-SR) 타당화 연구: ESEM 과 DIF 분석을 중심으로. 한국범죄학, 15(3), 5-35. https://doi.org/10.29095/JKCA.15.3.1
  21. 이유경, 서종한 (2021b). 자기보고식 사이코패시성격 종합평가 도구 (CAPP-SR) 타당화 연구: 평정척도모형을 중심으로. 경찰학연구, 21(3), 115-144. https://doi.org/10.22816/POLSCI.2021.21.3.006
  22. 이유경, 박소향, 서종한 (2021). 레빈슨 사이코패시 자기보고 검사 (LSRP; Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy scale)의 타당화: 한국 수용자를 대상으로. 교정담론, 15(2), 67-94. https://doi.org/10.46626/affc.2021.15.2.3
  23. 조은경, 이수정 (2008), 한국판 표준화. PCL-R 전문가 지침서. (R. D. Hare 저, 조은경, 이수정 역) (pp. 259-295). 학지사 심리검사 연구소.
  24. 조호진, 이풍가, 마홍, 옥지수 (2022). 한국어판 단축형 어둠의 3 요소 척도 (K-Dirty Dozen) 의 타당도와 요인구조 연구. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 35(2), 299-326. https://doi.org/10.24230/KJIOP.V35I2.299-326
  25. 황승흠 (2010). 한국 법의식조사 연구사의 검토. 법학논총, 22(2), 59-92. https://doi.org/10.17251/LEGAL.2010.22.2.59
  26. Agisdottir, S., Gerstein, L. H., & Cinarbas, D. C. (2008). Methodological issues in cross-cultural counseling research: Equivalence, bias, and translations. The Counseling Psychologist, 36(2), 188-219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000007305384
  27. Anderson, T. W., & Rubin, H. (1956). Statistical inference in factor analysis. In J. Neyman (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability (pp. 111-150). University of California
  28. Andrich, D. (1978). Relationships between the Thurstone and Rasch approaches to item scaling. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2(3), 451-462. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662167800200319
  29. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588.
  30. Bonta, J., Law, M., & Hanson, K. (1998). The prediction of criminal and violent recidivism among mentally disordered offenders: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 123-142. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.123
  31. Brinkley, C. A., Diamond, P. M., Magaletta, P. R., & Heigel, C. P. (2008). Cross-validation of Levenson's Psychopathy Scale in a sample of federal female inmates. Assessment, 15(4), 464-482. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191108319043
  32. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230-258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005
  33. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. International Journal of Testing, 1(1), 55-86. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327574IJT0101_4
  34. Christian, E., & Sellbom, M. (2016). Development and validation of an expanded version of the three-factor Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(2), 155-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1068176
  35. Christian, E., Sellbom, M., & Wilkinson, R. B. (2017). Clarifying the associations between individual differences in general attachment styles and psychopathy. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 8(4), 329.
  36. Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. (1970a). Chapter I-Why Machiavelli. Studies in Machiavellianism, 1-9.
  37. Christie, R., & Geis, F. (1970b). Scale construction. Studies in Machiavellianism, 34(4), 10-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-174450-2.50007-5
  38. Cleckley, H. M. (1951). The mask of sanity. Postgraduate Medicine, 9(3), 193-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.1951.11694097
  39. Comrey, A. L. (1988). Factor-analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56(5), 754.
  40. Cooke, D. J. (1998). Psychopathy across cultures. In Psychopathy: Theory, research and implications for society (pp. 13-45). Springer Netherlands.
  41. Cooke, D. J., & Michie, C. (1997). An item response theory analysis of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist--Revised. Psychological Assessment, 9(1), 3.
  42. Cooke, D. J., Hart, S. D., Logan, C., & Michie, C. (2012). Explicating the construct of psychopathy: Development and validation of a conceptual model, the Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality (CAPP). International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 11(4), 242-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2012.746759
  43. Cooke, D. J., Michie, C., Hart, S. D., & Clark, D. (2005). Searching for the pan-cultural core of psychopathic personality disorder. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(2), 283-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.01.004
  44. Cooke, D. J., Michie, C., Hart, S. D., & Clark, D. A. (2004). Reconstructing psychopathy: Clarifying the significance of antisocial and socially deviant behavior in the diagnosis of psychopathic personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 18(4), 337-357. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2004.18.4.337
  45. Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98.
  46. Douglas, K. S., Vincent, G. M., & Edens, J. F. (2018). Risk for criminal recidivism: The role of psychopathy. Handbook of Psychopathy, 682-709.
  47. Eichenbaum, A. E., Marcus, D. K., & French, B. F. (2021). Item response theory analysis of the Triarchic Psychopathy Measure. Psychological Assessment, 33(8), 766-776.
  48. Fanti, K. A., Lordos, A., Sullivan, E. A., & Kosson, D. S. (2018). Cultural and ethnic variations in psychopathy. Handbook of Psychopathy, 529-569.
  49. Fazel, S., Singh, J. P., Doll, H., & Grann, M. (2012). Use of risk assessment instruments to predict violence and antisocial behaviour in 73 samples involving 24 827 people: systematic review and meta-analysis. Bmj, 345.
  50. Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 286.
  51. Flynn, L. R., Goldsmith, R. E., & Kim, W. M. (2013). A cross-cultural study of materialism and brand engagement. Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (1947-2900), 5(3).
  52. Forouzan, E., & Cooke, D. J. (2005). Figuring out la femme fatale: Conceptual and assessment issues concerning psychopathy in females. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 23(6), 765-778. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.669
  53. Gelin, M. N., & Zumbo, B. D. (2003). Differential item functioning results may change depending on how an item is scored: An illustration with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63(1), 65-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164402239317
  54. Guadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W. F. (1988). Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychological Bulletin, 103(2), 265.
  55. Hare, R. D. (1991). Manual for the revised psychopathy-checklist. Multi-Health Systems.
  56. Hare, R. D. (2009). Behaviors of the Psychopath. Ocean county corporation: World Press. November.
  57. Hare, R. D., Forth, A. E., & Strachan, K. E. (1992). Psychopathy and crime across the life span. In R. D. Peters, R. J. McMahon, & V. L. Quinsey (Eds.), Aggression and violence throughout the life span (pp. 285-300). Sage Publications, Inc.
  58. Hart, S. D., & Storey, J. E. (2013). Clinical and forensic issues in the assessment of psychopathy. In R. K. Otto & I. B. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Forensic psychology (pp. 556-578). John Wiley & Sons, Inc..
  59. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424.
  60. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  61. International Test Commission. (2017). The ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests (Second edition). https://www.InTestCom.org
  62. Jones, S., & Miller, J. D. (2012). Psychopathic traits and externalizing behaviors: a comparison of self-and informant reports in the statistical prediction of externalizing behaviors. Psychological Assessment, 24(1), 255.
  63. Karpman, B. (1948). The myth of the psychopathic personality. American Journal of Psychiatry, 104(9), 523-534. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.104.9.523
  64. Kosson, D. S., Smith, S. S., & Newman, J. P. (1990). Evaluating the construct validity of psychopathy in black and white male inmates: three preliminary studies. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99(3), 250.
  65. Kraepelin, E. (1904). Lectures on clinical psychiatry. William Wood & Co.
  66. Kreis, M. K., & Cooke, D. J. (2011). Capturing the psychopathic female: A prototypicality analysis of the Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality (CAPP) across gender. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 29(5), 634-648. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.1003
  67. Kropp, P. R., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Eaves, D. (1994). Manual for the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment (SARA) Guide. Vancouver, The British Columbia Institute Against Family Violence.
  68. Kropp, P. R., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Eaves, D. (1995). Manual for the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide (SARA). British Columbia, The British Columbia Institute on Family Violence.
  69. Kropp, P. R., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Eaves, D. (1999). Spousal assault risk assessment guide (SARA). Toronto, Multi-Health Systems.
  70. Leistico, A. M. R., Salekin, R. T., DeCoster, J., & Rogers, R. (2008). A large-scale meta-analysis relating the Hare measures of psychopathy to antisocial conduct. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 28-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-007-9096-6
  71. Levenson, M. R., Kiehl, K. A., & Fitzpatrick, C. M. (1995). Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(1), 151.
  72. Lilienfeld, S. O., Widows, M. R., & Staff, P. A. R. (2005). Psychopathic personality inventory TM-revised. Social Influence (SOI), 61(65), 97.
  73. Logan, C. (2009). Psychopathy in women: Conceptual issues, clinical presentation, and management. Neuropsychiatrie, 23(S1), 1-9.
  74. Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Routledge. 
  75. Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 391.
  76. Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 320-341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
  77. McHoskey, J. W., Worzel, W., & Szyarto, C. (1998). Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 192.
  78. McNamara, T. F. (1991). The Role of Item Response Theory in Language Test Validation.
  79. Monaghan, C., Bizumic, B., & Sellbom, M. (2018). Nomological network of two-dimensional Machiavellianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 130, 161-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.03.047
  80. Moshagen, M., Hilbig, B. E., & Zettler, I. (2018). The dark core of personality. Psychological Review, 125(5), 656.
  81. Nicholls, T. L., & Petrila, J. (2005). Gender and psychopathy: An overview of important issues and introduction to the special issue. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 23(6), 729-741. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.677
  82. Nicholls, T. L., Odgers, C. L., & Cooke, D. J. (2007). Women and girls with psychopathic characteristics. In A. R. Felthous & H. Sass (Eds.), International handbook on psychopathic disorders and the law (pp. 347-366). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  83. Ozsoy, E., Rauthmann, J. F., Jonason, P. K., & Ardic, K. (2017). Reliability and validity of the Turkish versions of dark triad dirty dozen (DTDD-T), short dark triad (SD3-T), and single item narcissism scale (SINS-T). Personality and Individual Differences, 117, 11-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.05.019
  84. Patrick, C. J. (2010). Operationalizing the triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: Preliminary description of brief scales for assessment of boldness, meanness, and disinhibition. Unpublished test manual, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, 1110-1131.
  85. Patrick, C. J., Fowles, D. C., & Krueger, R. F. (2009). Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: Developmental origins of disinhibition, boldness, and meanness. Development and Psychopathology, 21(3), 913-938. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579409000492
  86. Pilch, I., & Gornik-Durose, M. E. (2016). Do we need "dark" traits to explain materialism? The incremental validity of the Dark Triad over the HEXACO domains in predicting materialistic orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 102-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.047
  87. Pinel, P. (1962). A treatise on insanity (D. Davis, Trans.). Hafner.(Original work published 1801).
  88. Rogers, R., Vitacco, M. J., Jackson, R. L., Martin, M., Collins, M., & Sewell, K. W. (2002). Faking psychopathy? An examination of response styles with antisocial youth. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78(1), 31-46. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA7801_03
  89. Rogoza, R., Zemojtel-Piotrowska, M., Jonason, P. K., Piotrowski, J., Campbell, K. W., Gebauer, J., & Wlodarczyk, A. (2021). Structure of Dark Triad Dirty Dozen across eight world regions. Assessment, 28(4), 1125-1135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191120922611
  90. Rossier, J., Ouedraogo, A., & Dahourou, D. (2017). Personality structure and assessment in French-speaking African cultures. In A. T. Church (Ed.), The Praeger handbook of personality across cultures: Trait psychology across cultures (pp. 73-103). Praeger/ABC-CLIO.
  91. Roy, S., Vize, C., Uzieblo, K., Van Dongen, J. D., Miller, J., Lynam, D., ... & Neumann, C. S. (2021). Triarchic or septarchic?-Uncovering the Triarchic Psychopathy Measure's (TriPM) structure. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 12(1), 1.
  92. Salekin, R. T., Rogers, R., & Sewell, K. W. (1996). A review and meta-analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist and Psychopathy Checklist-Revised: Predictive validity of dangerousness. Clinical psychology: Science and Practice, 3(3), 203.
  93. Schneider, K. (1934). Die psychopathischen personlichkeiten (3rd ed.). Deuticke.
  94. Sea, J., & Cooke, D. (2023). Prototypicality analysis of the Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality (CAPP): A cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 68(4), 1245-1258. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.15268
  95. Sekhar, S., Uppal, N., & Shukla, A. (2020). Dispositional greed and its dark allies: An investigation among prospective managers. Personality and Individual Differences, 162, 110005.
  96. Sellbom, M., Cooke, D. J., & Shou, Y. (2019). Development and initial validation of the Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality-Self-Report (CAPP-SR). Psychological Assessment, 31(7), 878.
  97. Singh, J. P., Grann, M., & Fazel, S. (2011). A comparative study of violence risk assessment tools: A systematic review and metaregression analysis of 68 studies involving 25,980 participants. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(3), 499-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.11.009
  98. Skeem, J. L., & Cooke, D. J. (2010a). Is criminal behavior a central component of psychopathy? Conceptual directions for resolving the debate. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 433.
  99. Skeem, J. L., & Cooke, D. J. (2010b). One measure does not a construct make: Directions toward reinvigorating psychopathy research-reply to Hare and Neumann (2010). Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 455-459. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014862
  100. Tsang, S., Salekin, R. T., Coffey, C. A., & Cox, J. (2018). A comparison of self-report measures of psychopathy among nonforensic samples using item response theory analyses. Psychological Assessment, 30(3), 311.
  101. Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002
  102. Verona, E., Sprague, J., & Javdani, S. (2012). Gender and factor-level interactions in psychopathy: Implications for self-directed violence risk and borderline personality disorder symptoms. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3(3), 247-262. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025945
  103. Webster, C. D., Douglas, K. S., Eaves, D., & Hart, S. D. (1997). HCR-20: Assessing risk for violence (version 2). Vancouver, Simon Fraser University.