DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Phenomenological Study on NPhenomenological Study on Non-face-to-face Learning Experiences of Nursing Studentson-face-to-face Learning

간호대학생들의 비대면 학습 경험에 대한 현상학적 연구

  • Yunjeong Kim (Dept. of Nursing Science, Pai Chai University)
  • Received : 2023.10.30
  • Accepted : 2024.01.20
  • Published : 2024.01.28

Abstract

The purpose of this study is a qualitative study to understand the meaning and essence of nursing students' non-face-to-face learning experience. It was conducted for two months from March to April 2022, targeting 12 students who participated in non-face-to-face learning, and three focus groups were formed and interviewed. Interview data were analyzed using Coaizzi's phenomenological research method. As a result of the study, 4 themes and 12 subtopics were derived. The four themes were 'freedom', 'efficiency', 'self-control', and 'lack of social skills'. Nursing students learned the meaning of non-face-to-face learning through non-face-to-face learning. Through the non-face-to-face learning experience of nursing students, the true meaning of non-face-to-face learning was analyzed and learned. The results of this study provided an understanding of the non-face-to-face learning experience of nursing students, which can be applied to the diversification of non-face-to-face education programs.

본 연구의 목적은 간호대학생들의 비대면 학습을 경험한 그 의미와 본질을 파악하고자 질적 연구방법을 적용하여 파악하였다. 비대면 학습에 참여한 학생중 12명을 대상으로, 2022년 3월부터 4월까지 실시하고 3그룹의 포커스 집단을 구성하여 면담하였다. 면담자료는 Coaizzi의 현상학적 연구방법을 사용하여 분석하였다. 연구 결과 4개의 주제와 12개의 하부주제로 도출되었다. 4개의 주제는 '자유로움', '효율성', '자기통제', '사회성 부족'등으로 나타났다. 간호대학생들은 비대면 학습을 통해 비대면 학습의 의미를 알게 되었다. 간호대학생들의 비대면 학습 경험을 통해 비대면 학습의 참된 의미를 분석하고 알 수 있었다. 본 연구 결과 간호대학생의 비대면 학습 경험에 대한 참여자들의 내적이해를 제공하였으며, 이는 비대면 교육 프로그램에 다양하게 적용할 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the research grant of Pai Chai University in 2022.

References

  1. D.J. Lee & M.S. Kim. (2020). University students' perceptions on the practices of online learning in the COVID-19 situation and future directions. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning. 2393), 359-377.
  2. D. W. Kim, H. J. Kim & T.G. Han. (2021). Satisfaction and Changes in Perception of Non-face Online-Classes at C University. Eduction Research Institute at CNUE, 6(1), 73-101.
  3. H. Hwang. (2021). Factors affecting satisfaction in face-to-face and non-face classes. The Journal of Education Research, 19(2), 9-80.
  4. Y. R. Jonng. (2009). A Study of the Effect Factors Influence on Course Satisfaction in Cyber University. Journal of Educational Technology, 25(1), 61-94. DOI : 10.17232/KSET.25.1.61
  5. S. N. Kim. (2020). The contents analysis of Nursing student's Perception about on- line Lecture. Journal of Learner-centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(17). 477-491. DOI : 10.22251/jlcci.2020.20.17.477
  6. J. Kim, "Analysis of content through student response toface-to-face and untact instructions", Journal of the Edutainment, 2(2), 1-15, Dec. 2020. DOI : 10.36237/koedus.2.2.1
  7. W. Choi, "Comparison between online and offline general English classes in a graduate school: A case study amid the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of the Korea English Education Society, 19(4), 223-245, Sep. 2020. DOI : 10.18649/jkees.2020.19.4.223
  8. D. W. Kim, H. J. Kim, & T. K. Han. (2021). Satisfaction and Changes in Perception of Non-Face Online-Classes at C University, 691), School and Teaching Research. 73-101.
  9. Biwer, F.., Wirandhany, W., Oude Egbtink, M., Hospers, H., Wasenitz., S., Janse, W., & De Bruin, A. (2021). Changes and adaptations: How university students self-regulate their online learning during th COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 642-651.
  10. M. Choi. (2007). Analysis of learning effect in learning environment inonline and offline lectures by the same teacher, Journal of Korean Association for Educational Infor- mation and Media, 13(4), 5-23.
  11. Giorgi, A. (1992). Description versus interpretation: competingalternative strategies for qualitative research. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 23(2), 119-135. https://doi.org/10.1163/156916292X00090
  12. Husserl, E. (1976). Ideen zu einer reinen phanomenologie und phanomenologischen philosophie. Erstes buch: allgemeine einfuhrung indie reine phanomenologie. 1. Halbband. Text der 1.-3. Auflage. DenHaag: Martinus Nijhoff.
  13. Colaizzi F. Psychological researches phenomenologist views it. In: Valle RS, King M, editors. Existential phenomenological alternatives for psychology , New Work: Oxford university Press Inc; 1978. 48-71.
  14. Colaizzi, P. F, 1978. Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In R. Vaile and M. king (Eds.), Existential phenomenological altermatives for psychologi(pp. 48-71). New Yok: oxford University Press.
  15. Colaizzi, F. U. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In: Vails, R. S., King.(Ed). Existenial phenomenological alternatives for psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  16. Lincoln YS, Guba EF. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. CA: Sage.
  17. S. Y. Kim. (2021), A study according to the learning outcomes of non-face-to-face classes and lecture satisfaction, Industrial Convergence Research. 19(6), 123-129. https://doi.org/10.22678/JIC.2021.19.6.123
  18. J. M., Kim, K. T., Son, E. P., Lee, J. Y., Jeong, H. B., Jang, & H. J. Lee. (2020). The Effects of Interaction Between Instructor-Student and Student-Student on Learning Achievement in Synchronous E-learning for Major Classes for University Students: The Mediating Role of Learning Flow, Agricultural education and human resource development, 52(3), 25-48.
  19. H. R., Noh, & M. N. Choi. (2023). A study on the perception of the difficulties of non-face-to-face-online classes for college students according to learner characteristics and self-regulation levels in the COVID-19 situation, University teaching and learning research, 16(1). 25-48.