DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effectiveness of laser-engineered copper-nickel titanium versus superelastic nickel-titanium aligning archwires: A randomized clinical trial

  • Received : 2023.04.17
  • Accepted : 2023.08.29
  • Published : 2024.01.25

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of laser-engineered copper-nickel titanium (SmartArch) and superelastic nickel-titanium (SENT) archwires in aligning teeth and inducing root resorption and pain experienced by patients. Methods: Two-arm parallel groups with a 1:1 allocation ratio were used. The participants were patients aged 11.5 years and older with 5-9 mm of mandibular anterior crowding who were indicated for non-extraction treatment. The primary outcome was alignment effectiveness, assessed using Little's irregularity index (LII) over 16 weeks with a single wire (0.016-inch) in the SmartArch group and 2 wires (0.014- and 0.018-inch) in the SENT group (8 weeks each). Secondary outcomes included root resorption evaluated by pre- and post-intervention periapical radiographs and pain levels recorded by the participants during the first week. Results: A total of 40 participants were randomly allocated into 2 groups; 33 completed the study and were analyzed (16 in the SmartArch group and 17 in the SENT group, aged 16.97 ± 4.05 years). The total LII decrease for the SmartArch and SENT groups was 5.63 mm and 5.29 mm, respectively, which was neither statistically nor clinically significant. Root resorption was not significantly different between the groups. The difference in pain levels was not statistically significant for the first 5 days following wire placement; however, there was a significant difference favoring the SENT group in the final 2 days. Conclusions: SmartArch and SENT archwires were similarly effective during the alignment phase of orthodontic treatment. Root resorption should be observed throughout the treatment with either wire. SmartArch wires demonstrated higher pain perception than SENT wires.

Keywords

References

  1. Wang Y, Liu C, Jian F, McIntyre GT, Millett DT, Hickman J, et al. Initial arch wires used in orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;7:CD007859. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007859.pub4
  2. Jian F, Lai W, Furness S, McIntyre GT, Millett DT, Hickman J, et al. Initial arch wires for tooth alignment during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;2013:CD007859. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007859.pub3
  3. Abdelrahman RSh, Al-Nimri KS, Al Maaitah EF. A clinical comparison of three aligning archwires in terms of alignment efficiency: a prospective clinical trial. Angle Orthod 2015;85:434-9. https://doi.org/10.2319/041414-274.1
  4. Rodrigues PF, Fernandes FMB, Magalhaes R, Camacho E, Lopes A, Paula AS, et al. Thermo-mechanical characterization of NiTi orthodontic archwires with graded actuating forces. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2020;107:103747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103747
  5. Viecilli RF, Burstone CJ. Ideal orthodontic alignment load relationships based on periodontal ligament stress. Orthod Craniofac Res 2015;18 Suppl 1:180-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12079
  6. Abaas HD, Al-Huwaizi AF. Load-deflection characteristics and force levels of coated nickel titanium orthodontic archwires. J Bagh Coll Dent 2015;27:154-7. https://www.jbcd.uobaghdad.edu. iq/index.php/jbcd/article/view/728 https://doi.org/10.12816/0015312
  7. Ormco Corporation. NEW SMARTARCH Laser Engineered CuNiTi® brochure [Internet]. Amersfoort: Ormco Corporation; 2019 [cited 2022 Dec 15]. Available from: https://ormco.ie/wp-content/uploads/sites/21/2019/05/Flyer-A4-New-SmartArchEU_WEB3.pdf.
  8. Modi N, Gupta R, Borah M. Newer orthodontic archwires- a review. Int J Appl Dent Sci 2020;6:90-4. https://doi.org/10.22271/oral.2020.v6.i4b.1052
  9. Shah B. Bending and phase transformation properties of a force gradient nickel-titanium orthodontic wire [MS Thesis]. Milwaukee: Marquette University; 2021. https://epublications.marquette.edu/theses_open/675/
  10. Jain S, Sharma P, Shetty D. Comparison of two different initial archwires for tooth alignment during fixed orthodontic treatment- a randomized clinical trial. J Orthod Sci 2021;10:13. https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.JOS_17_20
  11. Azizi F, Extiari A, Imani MM. Tooth alignment and pain experience with A-NiTi versus Cu-NiTi: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health 2021;21:431. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01789-5
  12. Nabbat SA, Yassir YA. A clinical comparison of the effectiveness of two types of orthodontic aligning archwire materials: a multicentre randomized clinical trial. Eur J Orthod 2020;42:626-34. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjz102
  13. Atik E, Gorucu-Coskuner H, Akarsu-Guven B, Taner T. A comparative assessment of clinical efficiency between premium heat-activated copper nickeltitanium and superelastic nickel-titanium archwires during initial orthodontic alignment in adolescents: a randomized clinical trial. Prog Orthod 2019;20:46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-019-0299-4
  14. Phermsang-Ngarm P, Charoemratrote C. Tooth and bone changes after initial anterior dental alignment using preformed vs customized nickel titanium archwires in adults: a randomized clinical trial. Angle Orthod 2018;88:425-34. https://doi.org/10.2319/090317-589.1
  15. Little RM. The irregularity index: a quantitative score of mandibular anterior alignment. Am J Orthod 1975;68:554-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(75)90086-x
  16. Malmgren O, Goldson L, Hill C, Orwin A, Petrini L, Lundberg M. Root resorption after orthodontic treatment of traumatized teeth. Am J Orthod 1982;82:487-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(82)90317-7
  17. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010;340:c869. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c869
  18. Mahmoudzadeh M, Farhadian M, Alijani S, Azizi F. Clinical comparison of two initial arch wires (ANiTi and Heat Activated NiTi) for amount of tooth alignment and perception of pain: a randomized clinical trial. Int Orthod 2018;16:60-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2018.01.007
  19. Aydin B, Senisik NE, Koskan O. Evaluation of the alignment efficiency of nickel-titanium and coppernickel-titanium archwires in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment over a 12-week period: a single-center, randomized controlled clinical trial. Korean J Orthod 2018;48:153-62. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2018.48.3.153
  20. Abdaljawwad AA, Al-Groosh DH. Effects of various analgesics on pain perception and rate of tooth movement: a randomized controlled clinical study. J Baghdad Coll Dent 2022;34:37-51. https://jbcd. uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/jbcd/article/view/3144 https://doi.org/10.26477/jbcd.v34i2.3144
  21. Serafim CM, Gurgel Jde A, Tiago CM, Tavarez RR, Maia Filho EM. Clinical efficiency of two sequences of orthodontic wires to correct crowding of the lower anterior teeth. ScientificWorldJournal 2015;2015:690280. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/690280
  22. Gok F, Buyuk SK, Ozkan S, Benkli YA. Comparison of arch width and depth changes and pain/ discomfort with conventional and copper Ni-Ti archwires for mandibular arch alignment. J World Fed Orthod 2018;7:24-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2018.01.001
  23. Luppanapornlarp S, Kajii TS, Surarit R, Iida J. Interleukin-1beta levels, pain intensity, and tooth movement using two different magnitudes of continuous orthodontic force. Eur J Orthod 2010;32:596-601. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjp158
  24. Yassir YA, McIntyre GT, Bearn DR. Orthodontic treatment and root resorption: an overview of systematic reviews. Eur J Orthod 2021;43:442-56. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjaa058
  25. Weiland F. Constant versus dissipating forces in orthodontics: the effect on initial tooth movement and root resorption. Eur J Orthod 2003;25:335-42. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/25.4.335
  26. Currell SD, Liaw A, Blackmore Grant PD, Esterman A, Nimmo A. Orthodontic mechanotherapies and their influence on external root resorption: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2019;155:313-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.10.015