Journal of the Korean Society of Fisheries and Ocean Technology (수산해양기술연구)

The Korean Society of Fisheries and Ocean Technology (한국수산해양기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of the risk factors for offshore gillnet fisheries in the floating offshore wind farms based on AHP technique

AHP 기법을 이용한 부유식 해상 풍력 단지 내 근해자망어업 위험 요인 분석

  • Jong-Kap AHN (Institute of Marine Industry, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • You-Jin PARK (Department of Business Administration, Yonsei University) ;
  • Yu-Jin JEONG (Department of Business Administration, Yonsei University) ;
  • Young-Su AN (Institute of Marine Industry, Gyeongsang National University)
  • 안종갑 (경상국립대학교 해양산업연구소) ;
  • 박유진 (연세대학교 경영학) ;
  • 정유진 (연세대학교) ;
  • 안영수 (경상국립대학교 해양산업연구소)
  • Received : 2023.11.06
  • Accepted : 2023.11.28
  • Published : 2023.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, the AHP (analytic hierarchy process) technique was used to analyze the risk of expected risk factors and fishing possibilities during gillnet fishing within the floating offshore wind farms (floating OWF). For this purpose, the risks that may occur during gillnet fishing within the floating offshore wind farms were defined as collisions, entanglements, and snags. In addition, the risk factors that cause these risks were classified into three upper risk factors and ten sub risk factors, and the three alternatives to gillnet fishing available within the floating OWF were classified and a hierarchy was established. Lastly, a survey was conducted targeting fisheries and marine experts and the response results were analyzed. As a result of the analysis, among the top risk factors, the risk was the greatest when laying fishing gear. The risk of the sub factors for each upper risk was found to be the highest at the berthing (mooring), the final hauling of fishing net, and the laying of the bottom layer net. Based on the alternatives, the average of the integrated risk rankings showed that allowing full navigation/fisheries had the highest risk. As a result of the final ranking analysis of the integrated risk, the overall ranking of allowing navigation/fisheries in areas where bottom layer nets were laid was ranked the first when moving vessels within the floating OWF was analyzed as the lowest integrated risk ranking of the 30th at the ban on navigation/fisheries. Through this, navigation was analyzed to be possible while it was analyzed that the possibility of gillnet fishing within the floating OWF was not high.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 연구는 2023년 해양수산부 재원으로 해양수산과학기술진흥원(KIMST)의 (전기복합 추진어선의 검증 및 실용화를 위한 기술개발과 체계구축)지원을 받아 수행된 연구임.

References

  1. Cho HS, and Suh HJ. 2018. AHP analysis techniques for the weighted evaluation of cultural heritage disaster safety management systems. Journal of The Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation 18, 43-53. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2018.18.5.43. 
  2. Equinor. 2021. sepping up Korean offshore wind plans, 3GW collaboration with EWP. Retrieved from https://www.equinor.com/news/archive/20211117-korean-offshore-wind-plans. Accessed 27 Nov 2023. 
  3. Fishermen in Fisheries. 2022. Our sea is covered by offshore wind power, resulting in the loss of fishing grounds. Retrieved from http://www.suhyupnews.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=29700. Accessed 23 Nov 2023. 
  4. Jung CY, Hwang BK, and Kim SC. 2019. Possibility of fishery in offshore wind farms. Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety 25, 535-541. https://doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2019.25.5.535. 
  5. KSETEP. 2019. Feasibility study report for 2018 floating offshore wind technology demonstration project, 1-254. 
  6. Kwon YM, Lee CY, and Rim GS. 2018. A review of vessel traffic and fishing activity standards for offshore wind farm in domestic areas based on the analysis of foreign cases. Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety 24, 29-35. https://doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2018.24.1.029. 
  7. Park J, Yim H, Park S, and Cho K. 2021. A study on the fishermen'acceptability of offshore wind farms. Journal of Environmental Policy and Administration 29, 83-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.15301/jepa.2021.29.4.83. 
  8. Pham TQM, Im S, and Choung J. 2021. Prospects and economics of offshore wind turbine systems. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology 35, 382-392. https://doi.org/10.26748/KSOE.2021.061. 
  9. Satty TL and Kearns KP. 1985. Analytical planning: the organization of systems. Pergamon Press, Inc., New York, 32.