DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

소아 X선 촬영조건 변화에 따른 소아 및 촬영보조자 선량

Doses of Pediatric and X-ray Examination Assistants according to Changes in Pediatric X-ray Exposure Conditions

  • 장범진 (가천대학교 방사선학과) ;
  • 남하윤 (가천대학교 방사선학과) ;
  • 신혜민 (가천대학교 방사선학과) ;
  • 윤동민 (가천대학교 방사선학과) ;
  • 이승국 (가천대학교 방사선학과) ;
  • 장인화 (가천대학교 방사선학과) ;
  • 김성철 (가천대학교 방사선학과)
  • Beom-Jin Jang (Department of Radiological science, Gachon University) ;
  • Ha-Yun Nam (Department of Radiological science, Gachon University) ;
  • Hye-Min Shin (Department of Radiological science, Gachon University) ;
  • Dong-Min Yun (Department of Radiological science, Gachon University) ;
  • Seung-Kook Lee (Department of Radiological science, Gachon University) ;
  • In-Hwa Jang (Department of Radiological science, Gachon University) ;
  • Sungchul Kim (Department of Radiological science, Gachon University)
  • 투고 : 2023.09.24
  • 심사 : 2023.10.10
  • 발행 : 2023.10.31

초록

Although pediatric X-ray examinations are continuously increasing, there are not many studies on the radiation exposure to children and X-ray examination assistants according to X-ray Exposure conditions. Accordingly, we measured the radiation exposure dose of pediatric and X-ray examination assistants according to the standard guidelines and clinical average X-ray Exposure conditions when X-ray examination 10-year-old children. The effective dose and organ dose to pediatric were measured using an Dose area production meter and Monte Carlo-based PCXMC program, and the exposure dose of X-ray examination assistants was measured using an ion-chamber. When performing abdominal supine AP projection, the effective dose to children was up to 2.38 times higher under clinical average X-ray Exposure conditions than the standard guidelines. In addition, during abdominal supine AP projection, the radiation exposure dose to the X-ray examination assistants was highest on the hands at 0.0148 ~ 0.0709 mSv, and exposure dose could be reduced by up to 35% when wearing protective gloves. In conclusion, because the X-ray Exposure conditions used in clinical are unnecessarily high, unnecessary medical radiation exposure could be reduced if appropriate X-ray Exposure conditions and the radiation field area were minimized and the assistant wore shielding gloves.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. BEIR VII Report: Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionising radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2. The National Academies Press, Washington DC; 2006. Retrieved from https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/11340/chapter/1
  2. Jung AY. Medical radiation exposure in children and dose reduction. Journal of the Korean Medical Association. 2011;54(12):1277-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2011.54.12.1277
  3. Rhee DB, Kim JK, Lee JM. A study on the comparison of radiation exposure dose and image quality of phantom chest radiography using radiographic assist device. New Physics: Sae Mulli. 2018;68(7): 801-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3938/NPSM.68.801
  4. Jeung SH, Han BH, Jung HR. Evaluation of image quality when using grid during child chest x-ray examination. Korean Association for Radiation Protection. 2017;40(3):371-6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2017.40.3.03
  5. Park SH, Lee CS, Kim WR, Lee JK. Investigation of organ dose difference of age phantoms for medical X-ray examinations. J. Korea Asso. Radiat. Prot. 2003;28(1):35-42. Retrieved from https://www.jrpr.org/upload/pdf/BSBOB5_2003_v28n1_35.pdf
  6. Heo YJ, Kim KT, Cho CH, Kang SM, Park JK, Kang SS, et al. Measurement of comparison to scattering dose space according to the presence or absence of protective clothing in the x-ray room. Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology. 2012;6(4):313-20. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7742/jksr.2012.6.4.313
  7. Seo SY, Han MS, Kim CG, Jeon MC, Kim YK, Kim GJ. A study on the usefulness of a fusion model designed cloak shield to reduce the radiation exposure of the assistant during CT of severely injured patient. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society. 2017;8(9):211-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2017.8.9.211
  8. Kim CB, Dong KR. Radiation shoot young child: Environment and real fact Radiation shoot young child. J. of Advanced Engineering and Technology. 2014;7(4):185-90. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/GC/Downloads/KCI_FI001950175%20(1).pdf
  9. Kwak JH, Jeong JB. A study on the guardian's perception of attending patient in pediatric radiography. J. Korean Soc. Radiol. 2014;8(4):189-201. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7742/jksr.2014.8.4.189
  10. Ministry of Korean Food & Drug Safety. Standard guidelines for pediatric general radiology examinations), Radiation Safety Management Series No.35; 2013. Retrieved from https://www.mfds.go.kr/brd/m_1060/view.do?seq=12327&srchFr=&srchTo=&srchWord=&srchTp=&itm_seq_1=0&itm_seq_2=0&multi_itm_seq=0&company_cd=&company_nm=&page=92
  11. Kang AR, Lee IJ, Ahn SM. Comparison of ESD and major organ absorbed doses of 5-year-old standard guidelines and clinical exposure conditions. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2017;40(3):355-61. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2017.40.3.01
  12. Kim HS, Park SM, Lee SY, Baek SM, Chae SY, Park JH, et al. Development of the diagnostic reference level of pediatric radiography (10 years old)). Ministry of Korean Food & Drug Safety, 14171Radiation430; 2014. Retrieved from https://scienceon.kisti.re.kr/srch/selectPORSrchReport.do?cn=TRKO201500007469
  13. Kim JH, Sung DW, Kim JW, Shin JH, Lee SK, Jung KI, et al. Nationwise survey of the x-ray beam collimator utilization in general diagnostic radiograph. Progress in Medical Physics. 2013;24(2):119-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14316/pmp.2013.24.2.119
  14. Tapiovaara M, Siiskonen T. PCXMC A Monte Carlo program for calculating patient doses in medical x-ray examinations. 2nd ed. Report STUK-A139 2008, Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, Finland (STUK); 2008. Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=PCXMC+A+Monte+Carlo+program+for+calculating+patient+doses+in+medical+x%E2%80%90ray+examinations+(2nd+Ed.)&publication_year=2008&
  15. Servomaa A, Tapiovaara M. Organ dose calculation in medical X-ray examinations by the program PCXMC. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 1998;80:213-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032509
  16. Johnson K. Reducing unnecessary skull radiographs in children: A multidisciplinary audit. Clin Radiol. 2004;59(7):616-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2003.11.019
  17. Earl VJ, Potter AOG, Perdomo AA. Effective doses for common paediatric diagnostic general radiography examinations at a major Australian paediatric hospital and the communication of associated radiation risks. J Med Radiat Sci. 2023;70(1):30-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.632