DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of Knee Weight-bearing Radiography Assist Device

무릎 체중부하 촬영 보조장치 개발

  • Yon-Lae Kim (Department of Radiological Technology, Choonhae College of Health Science) ;
  • Young-Woo Yoon (Department of Radiological Technology, Choonhae College of Health Science)
  • 김연래 (춘해보건대학교 방사선과) ;
  • 윤영우 (춘해보건대학교 방사선과)
  • Received : 2023.10.04
  • Accepted : 2023.10.13
  • Published : 2023.10.31

Abstract

The knee arthritis patients are generally performed standing position radiography. However, patients with pain caused by degenerative diseases or injuries in the knee have difficulty maintaining a standing position. Therefore, this study aims to develop a knee joint standing weight bearing projection assist device to solve these problems when patients undergo knee radiography due to various diseases. The design of the knee joint weight-bearing radiography assist device is carried out with 3D design and drawing production to secure basic data, electric support and frame manufacture. A fixed device for maintaining the patient's knee standing weight-bearing projection, an electric digital height device, a digital protractor, and a safety device were designed. The arm support is made of PVC with a cushion to relieve the impact and make it easier to remove debris. The digital electric device can be moved up and down according to the patient's height, and a remote control is attached. The safety device is made to be adjustable in size by attaching metal hooks on both sides of the frame and to shield the scrotum. A digital protractor was attached to the side frame to set the desired knee angle. When a self-made assist device was used to perform a knee joint standing weight bearing projection, it helped maintain arm support and lower extremities position. In addition, the height could be adjusted using an assist device during standing projections, which helped the patient maintain the position.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by Choonhae College of Health Sciences

References

  1. Manlapaz DG, Sole G, Jayakaran P, Chapple CM. Risk factors for falls in adults with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review. Pm&r. 2019;11(7): 745-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.12066
  2. Leach RE, Gregg T, Siber FJ. Weight-bearing radiography in osteoarthritis of the knee. Radiology. 1970:97(2):265-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/97.2.265
  3. Seo SY, Han MS, Jeon MC, Yu SJ, Kim YK. The evaluation of usefulness for new assistant device to observe posterior cruciate ligament rupture and patellofemoral joint injury in emergency patient. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2010; 33(2):93-6. Retrieved from http://ocean.kisti.re.kr/IS_mvpopo213L.do?ResultTotalCNT=9&pageNo=1&pageSize=10&method=view&acnCn1=&poid=ksrs1&kojic=BSSGBL&sVnc=v33n2&id=1&setId=&iTableId=&iDocId=&sFree=&pQuery=%28kojic%3ABSSGBL%29+AND+%28voliss_ctrl_no%3Av33n2%29
  4. Kong CG, Song JN, Kim IS, Han JB. Evaluation of the usefulness of assist device for rosenberg view test. Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology. 2020;14(2):129-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7742/jksr.2020.14.2.129
  5. Yoo JH, Yi SR, Son BK. The prone kneeling view of the intercondylar notch for radiographic assessment of the femoral tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2008; 24(4):465-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2007.09.017
  6. Mars Group. Radiographic findings in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions from the MARS cohort. The Journal of Knee Surgery. 2013: 239-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1329717
  7. Anderson AF, Anderson CN, Gorman TM, Cross MB, Spindler KP. Radiographic measurements of the intercondylar notch. Are they accurate? Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2007;23(3):261-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2006.11.003
  8. Cole J, Brand Jr. JC, Caborn DN, Johnson DL. Radiographic analysis of femoral tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The American Journal of Knee Surgery. 2000;13(4): 218-22. Retrieved from https://europepmc.org/article/med/11269541
  9. Hobbs DL. Osteoarthritis and the rosenberg method. Radiological Technology. 2006;77(3):179-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5121-1
  10. Vignon E, Piperno M, Le Graverand MP, Mazzuca SA, Brandt KD, Mathieu P, Favret H, Vignon M, Merle-Vincent F, Conrozier T. Measurement of radiographic joint space width in the tibiofemoral compartment of the osteoarthritic knee: Comparison of standing anteroposterior and Lyon schuss views. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48(2):378-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.10773
  11. Tipton SC, Sutherland J, Schwarzkopf R. Using the anatomical axis as an alternative to the mechanical axis to assess knee alignment. Orthopedics. 2015; 38(12):e1115-1120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20151123-01
  12. Kappel A, Mortensen JF, Nielsen PT, Odgaard A, Laursen M. Reliability of stress radiography in the assessment of coronal laxity following total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2019;27(1):221-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2019.09.013
  13. Hashemi J, Chandrashekar N, Gill B, Beynnon BD, Slauterbeck JR, Schutt Jr. RC, Mansouri H, Dabezies E. The geometry of the tibial plateau and its influence on the biomechanics of the tibiofemoral joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(12):2724-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.g.01358
  14. Oosthuizen CR, Takahashi T, Rogan M, Snyckers CH, Vermaak DP, Jones GG, Porteous A, Maposa I, Pandit H. The knee osteoarthritis grading system for arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34(3):450- 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.11.011
  15. Rosenberg TD, Paulos LE, Parker RD, Coward DB, Scott SM. The forty-five-degree posteroanterior flexion weight-bearing radiograph of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988:70(10):1479-83. Retrieved from https://journals.lww.com/jbjsjournal/_layouts/15/oaks.journals/downloadpdf.aspx?an=00004623-198870100-00006 100-00006