과제정보
본 연구는 2019년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구결과로 수행되었음(NRF-2019S1A3A2099973)
참고문헌
- 구본성, 이대기 (2022). 국내은행의 플랫폼 전략: 현황과 전망. 기타보고서, 2022(4), 1-65.
- 노희옥, 이상준 (2015). 지각된 IT 위협이 정보시스템 생산성에 미치는 영향. 정보기술아키텍처연구, 12(2), 207-217.
- 류성한, 윤혜정, 박재현, 장영훈 (2022). 메타버스 개념 및 현황에 대한 논의와 향후 연구 방향 제안. 지식경영연구, 23(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.15813/KMR.2022.23.2.001
- 문승혁 (2022). 메타버스의 발전과 적용이 산업과 사회에 미치는 영향. The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology, 8(3), 515-520. https://doi.org/10.17703/JCCT.2022.8.3.515
- 손창용, 박현선, 김상현 (2022). 금융 마이데이터 서비스 특성과 수용의도의 관계: 개인혁신성과 기술적 보안성의 조절효과. 지식경영연구, 23(4), 133-157. https://doi.org/10.15813/KMR.2022.23.4.007
- 신건권 (2018). SmartPLS3.0 구조방정식모델링. 서울: 도서출판 청람.
- 오지희 (2022). 대학생의 메타버스 이용 동기가 만족도와 지속이용의도에 미치는 영향: 가상세계 메타버스를 중심으로. 한국엔터테인먼트산업학회논문지, 16(2), 1-17.
- 이관섭, 우종필, 임설아 (2020). 인공지능 (AI) 스피커 이용의향에 영향을 미치는 요인 연구: 확장된 기술수용 모델 (E-TAM)을 중심으로. 융복합지식학회논문지, 8(4), 59-69. https://doi.org/10.22716/SCKT.2020.8.4.036
- 이민규, 박희준 (2019). 챗봇 사용 의도에 영향을 미치는 요인 탐색-금융 서비스에서의 챗봇. 품질경영학회지, 47(4), 755-765. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2019.47.4.755
- 이병권 (2021). 메타버스 (Metaverse) 세계와 우리의 미래. 한국콘텐츠학회지, 19(1), 13-17.
- 이은경, 전중옥, 최욱희 (2021). 온라인 쇼핑환경에서 양가감정 유발에 따른 소비자 반응 및 영향요인에 관한 연구. 관광연구저널, 35(8), 189-201.
- 이재광, 김종무, 이강은, 윤소라, 조현 (2017). 핀테크 수용에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구: 모바일 결제 서비스를 중심으로. 지식경영연구, 18(3), 181-199. https://doi.org/10.15813/KMR.2017.18.4.008
- 이한신, 김판수 (2019). 소비자의 기술수용과 저항이 인공지능 (AI) 사용의도에 미치는 영향. 경영학연구, 48(5), 1195-1219.
- 전동석, 방성철 (2022). 온택트 시대 무역의 변화와 온라인 전시회 활용에 관한 연구. 무역상무연구, 94, 121-143.
- 조영현, 이승주 (2021). 메타버스와 보험산업. KIRI 리포트 (포커스), 531, 1-8.
- Ashforth, B. E., Rogers, K. M., Pratt, M. G., & Pradies, C. (2014). Ambivalence in organizations: A multilevel approach. Organization Science, 25(5), 1453-1478. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0909
- Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
- Biener, V., Kalamkar, S., Nouri, N., Ofek, E., Pahud, M., Dudley, J. J., Hu, J., Kristensson, P. O., Weerasinghe, M., & Pucihar, K. C. (2022). Quantifying the effects of working in VR for one week. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 28(11), 3810-3820. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2022.3203103
- Boo, C., & Suh, A. (2022, November). Identifying metaverse characteristics and their influence on continuance intention: Evidence from Zepeto, Roblox, and Ifland. In KMIS International Conference, 134-140.
- Calvete, E., Corral, S., & EstEvez, A. (2007). Cognitive and coping mechanisms in the interplay between intimate partner violence and depression. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 20(4), 369-382. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615800701628850
- Carver, C. S. (1997). You want to measure coping but your protocol' too long: Consider the brief cope. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4(1), 92-100. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327558ijbm0401_6
- Chen, C. C., Chang, C. H., & Hsiao, K. L. (2022). Exploring the factors of using mobile ticketing applications: Perspectives from innovation resistance theory. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 67, 102974.
- Chouk, I., & Mani, Z. (2019). Factors for and against resistance to smart services: Role of consumer lifestyle and ecosystem related variables. Journal of Services Marketing, 33(4), 449-462.
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences second edition Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Hillsdale, NJ.
- Colby, C. L., & Parasuraman, A. (2001). Techno-ready marketing: How and why customers adopt technology. Simon and Schuster.
- Conner, M., & Sparks, P. (2002). Ambivalence and attitudes. European Review of Social Psychology, 12(1), 37-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792772143000012
- Cramer, P. (1998). Coping and defense mechanisms: What's the difference? Journal of Personality, 66(6), 919-946. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00037
- Dennis, J. P., & Vander Wal, J. S. (2010). The cognitive flexibility inventory: Instrument development and estimates of reliability and validity. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 34, 241-253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-009-9276-4
- Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. University of Akron Press.
- Folkman, S., & Moskowitz, J. T. (2004). Coping: Pitfalls and promise. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 55, 745-774. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141456
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
- Guarana, C. L., & Hernandez, M. (2016). Identified ambivalence: When cognitive conflicts can help individuals overcome cognitive traps. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(7), 1013.
- Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & G. Kuppelwieser, V. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
- Harrist, S. (2006). A phenomenological investigation of the experience of ambivalence. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 37(1), 85-114. https://doi.org/10.1163/156916206778150411
- Hong, D., & Cho, C. H. (2023). Factors affecting innovation resistance of smartphone AI voice assistants. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 39(13), 2557-2572. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2080899
- Jasperson, J., Carter, P. E., & Zmud, R. W. (2005). A comprehensive conceptualization of post-adoptive behaviors associated with information technology enabled work systems. MIS Quarterly, 29(3), 525-557. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148694
- Koletzko, S. H., Herrmann, M., & BrandstEtter, V. (2015). Unconflicted goal striving: Goal ambivalence as a mediator between goal self-concordance and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(1), 140-156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214559711
- Koohang, A., Nord, J. H., Ooi, K. B., Tan, G. W. H., Al-Emran, M., Aw, E. C. X., Baabdullah, A. M., Buhalis, D., Cham, T. H., & Dennis, C. (2023). Shaping the metaverse into reality: A holistic multidisciplinary understanding of opportunities, challenges, and avenues for future investigation. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 63(3), 735-765.
- Laukkanen, T. (2016). Consumer adoption versus rejection decisions in seemingly similar service innovations: The case of the Internet and mobile banking. Journal of Business Research, 69(7), 2432-2439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.013
- Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer Publishing Company.
- Maier, C., Laumer, S., Wirth, J., & Weitzel, T. (2019). Technostress and the hierarchical levels of personality: A two-wave study with multiple data samples. European Journal of Information Systems, 28(5), 496-522.
- Martin, M. M., & Rubin, R. B. (1995). A new measure of cognitive flexibility. Psychological Reports, 76(2), 623-626. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1995.76.2.623
- Mazmanian, M., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (2013). The autonomy paradox: The implications of mobile email devices for knowledge professionals. Organization Science, 24(5), 1337-1357. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0806
- Newby-Clark, I. R., McGregor, I., & Zanna, M. P. (2002). Thinking and caring about cognitive inconsistency: When and for whom does attitudinal ambivalence feel uncomfortable? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(2), 157.
- Nohlen, H. U., Van Harreveld, F., & Cunningham, W. A. (2019). Social evaluations under conflict: Negative judgments of conflicting information are easier than positive judgments. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 14(7), 709-718.
- Nordgren, L. F., Van Harreveld, F., & Van Der Pligt, J. (2006). Ambivalence, discomfort, and motivated information processing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(2), 252-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.04.004
- Ouvrein, G., Jorge, A., Cabral, J., & Vandebosch, H. (2023). Coping comes with the job: An exploratory study into the selection and use of coping strategies for online aggression among social media influencers. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 10, 100052.
- Parasuraman, A. (2000). Technology Readiness Index (TRI) a multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of Service Research, 2(4), 307-320. https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050024001
- Park, K., & Koh, J. (2017). Exploring the relationship between perceived pace of technology change and adoption resistance to convergence products. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 142-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.017
- Pratt, M. G. (2000). The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: Managing identification among Amway distributors. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 456-493. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667106
- Pratt, M. G., & Doucet, L. (2000). 11 ambivalent feelings in organizational relationships. Emotion in Organizations, 204.
- Priester, J. R., & Petty, R. E. (1996). The gradual threshold model of ambivalence: Relating the positive and negative bases of attitudes to subjective ambivalence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 431.
- Priester, J. R., & Petty, R. E. (2001). Extending the bases of subjective attitudinal ambivalence: Interpersonal and intrapersonal antecedents of evaluative tension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 19.
- Qahri-Saremi, H., & Montazemi, A. R. (2019). Factors affecting the adoption of an electronic word of mouth message: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36(3), 969-1001.
- Qahri-Saremi, H., & Turel, O. (2020). Ambivalence and coping responses in post-adoptive information systems use. Journal of Management Information Systems, 37(3), 820-848. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2020.1790193
- Rees, L., Rothman, N. B., Lehavy, R., & Sanchez-Burks, J. (2013). The ambivalent mind can be a wise mind: Emotional ambivalence increases judgment accuracy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(3), 360-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.12.017
- Roberts, N., Mellott, M., Dinger, M., & Campbell, D. (2016). Electronic medical record system avoidance in a turbulent environment. Information & Management, 53(5), 581-590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.01.003
- Rothman, N. B., Pratt, M. G., Rees, L., & Vogus, T. J. (2017). Understanding the dual nature of ambivalence: Why and when ambivalence leads to good and bad outcomes. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 33-72. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2014.0066
- Sheng, H., Nah, F. F. H., & Siau, K. (2008). An experimental study on ubiquitous commerce adoption: Impact of personalization and privacy concerns. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(6), 1.
- Stein, M. K., Newell, S., Wagner, E. L., & Galliers, R. D. (2015). Coping with information technology. MIS Quarterly, 39(2), 367-392.
- Suls, J., & Martin, R. (2005). The daily life of the gardenvariety neurotic: Reactivity, stressor exposure, mood spillover, and maladaptive coping. Journal of Personality, 73(6), 1485-1510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00356.x
- Turel, O. (2015). Quitting the use of a habituated hedonic information system: A theoretical model and empirical examination of Facebook users. European Journal of Information Systems, 24(4), 431-446. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.19
- Van Harreveld, F., Nohlen, H. U., & Schneider, I. K. (2015). The ABC of ambivalence: Affective, behavioral, and cognitive consequences of attitudinal conflict. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 52, pp. 285-324). Elsevier.
- Van Harreveld, F., Rutjens, B. T., Rotteveel, M., Nordgren, L. F., & Van Der Pligt, J. (2009). Ambivalence and decisional conflict as a cause of psychological discomfort: Feeling tense before jumping off the fence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(1), 167-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.08.015
- Van Harreveld, F., Van der Pligt, J., & De Liver, Y. N. (2009). The agony of ambivalence and ways to resolve it: Introducing the MAID model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(1), 45-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308324518
- Wetzels, M., Odekerken-SchrEder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 177-195. https://doi.org/10.2307/20650284
- Wu, J., Lin, K., Lin, D., Zheng, Z., Huang, H., & Zheng, Z. (2023). Financial crimes in Web3-empowered metaverse: Taxonomy, countermeasures, and opportunities. IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society, 4, 37-49.
- Wikipedia. (2016). http://www.wikipedia.org/
- 금융결제원 (2022). https://www.kftc.or.kr/kftc/data/EgovkftcDataDetail.do
- 김도형, 김자현, 박민우 (2022, 8월 20일). 메타버스 은행서 재테크 상담...얼굴인식 AI로 실명 인증. 동아일보, https://www.donga.com/news/View?gid=115039506&date=20220820
- 산업연구원 (2020). https://www.kiet.re.kr/research/issueView?issue_no=721
- 삼정KPMG (2021). https://kpmg.com/kr/ko/home/insights/2021/01/kr-insight-73.html
- 이정윤 (2021, 7월 19일). '메타버스 은행' 곧 나온다...은행권, 가상세계 프로젝트 가속화. 뉴스핌, https://www.newspim.com/news/view/20210719000733
- 정민하 (2022, 8월 16일). 독도에 가상지점 내고, 가상공간 청약까지...시중은행 메타버스 체험해보니. 조선비즈, https://biz.chosun.com/stock/finance/2022/08/16/RMOLSHQ7EBALFEXJ7LKISMOH4Y/
- 하나은행금융연구소 (2021). http://www.hanaif.re.kr/boardDetail.do?hmpeSeqNo=34779
- Morgan, J. P. (2022). Opportunities in the metaverse. ONYX. https://www.jpmorgan.com/content/dam/jpm/treasury-services/documents/opportunities-in-themetaverse.pdf
- Rupantar, & Jemima. (2022). https://www.verdict.co.uk/what-is-the-metaverse/