한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집 (Communications of Mathematical Education)

  • 제37권3호
  • /
  • Pages.443-465
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1226-6663(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-9935(eISSN)
한국수학교육학회 (Korean Society of Mathematical Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

<인공지능 수학> 교과서의 행렬과 벡터 내용 분석

Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Mathematics Textbooks: Vectors and Matrices

  • Lee, Youngmi (Graduate School of Education, Yonsei University) ;
  • Han, Chaereen (Graduate School of Education, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lim, Woong (Graduate School of Education, Yonsei University)
  • 투고 : 2023.05.19
  • 심사 : 2023.06.20
  • 발행 : 2023.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

2015 개정 수학과 교육과정에서는 <인공지능 수학> 과목이 신설되었으며, 행렬과 공간벡터 내용은 2015 개정 수학과 교육과정에서 <고급 수학>을 제외하고는 <인공지능 수학>에만 등장하는 일시적이면서도 특별한 상황에 놓여있다. 본 연구는 2015 개정 수학과 교육과정에 따라 5종으로 출판된 <인공지능 수학> 교과서의 자료의 표현, 자료의 분류, 자료의 처리 단원에서 인공지능을 이해하는데 필수적인 수학 개념이자 관련 학습 요소인 행렬과 벡터에 대한 정의와 관련 하위 개념들이 어떻게 구현되고 있는지를 파악하고, 유사한 개념이 다루어지는 타 교과목과의 연결성을 분석하였다. 그 결과, 행렬의 경우 기본 개념 제시에는 큰 차이가 없었으나 교과서별로 이미지 자료를 처리하는 데 있어 활용한 행렬의 하부 개념 유형이나 이용한 행렬의 연산에는 다소 차이가 있음이 확인되었다. 벡터의 정의와 하부 개념과 관련된 내용은 교과서별로 상이하였고, 벡터의 활용을 전개하는 데에 있어 벡터의 크기, 두 벡터 사이의 거리나 벡터의 내적에 대한 맥락의 수준 및 수학적인 해석에는 차이가 있었다. 이를 통해 벡터와 관련된 개념을 수학 교과의 연계성에 치중하여 설명한 교과서와 수학적 개념과 원리보다는 인공지능과 관련한 지식 학습에 초점을 맞춘 교과서가 식별되었다. 결과를 바탕으로 교육과정과 교과서 개발을 위한 시사점을 제시하였다.

This study examines the content of vectors and matrices in Artificial Intelligence Mathematics textbooks (AIMTs) from the 2015 revised mathematics curriculum. We analyzed the implementation of foundational mathematical concepts, specifically definitions and related sub-concepts of vectors and matrices, in these textbooks, given their importance for understanding AI. The findings reveal significant variations in the presentation of vector-related concepts, definitions, sub-concepts, and levels of contextual information and descriptions such as vector size, distance between vectors, and mathematical interpretation. While there are few discrepancies in the presentation of fundamental matrix concepts, differences emerge in the subtypes of matrices used and the matrix operations applied in image data processing across textbooks. There is also variation in how textbooks emphasize the interconnectedness of mathematics for explaining vector-related concepts versus the textbooks place more emphasis on AI-related knowledge than on mathematical concepts and principles. The implications for future curriculum development and textbook design are discussed, providing insights into improving AI mathematics education.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ko, H. (2020). A study on development of school mathematics contents for Artificial Intelligence (AI) capability. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 23(2), 223-237. https://doi.org/10.30807/ksms.2020.23.2.003
  2. Ku, N. & Choi, I. (2022). An analysis of the textbook: Focusing on forecast and optimization. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 32(2), 125-147.
  3. Ministry of Education (2020). Mathematics curriculum. No. 2020-236.
  4. Kwon, O., Lee, K., Oh, S., & Park, J. (2021). An analysis of 'related learning elements' reflected in Intelligence Mathematics> textbooks. Communications of Mathematical Education, 35(4), 445-473.
  5. Kim, G. Y. & Jeon, M. (2017). Exploring how middle-school matheamtics textbooks on functions provide students an opportunity-to-learn. School Mathematics, 19(2), 289-317.
  6. Kim, M. & Kim, G. Y. (2013). The analysis of mathematical tasks in the high school mathematics. School Mathematics, 15(1), 37-39.
  7. Kim, M. (2013). Secondary mathematics teachers' use of mathematics textbooks and teachers' guide. School Mathematics, 15(3), 503-531.
  8. Kim, So., Kim, Se., & Kim, H. (2019). Analysis of international educational trends and learning tools for artificial intelligence education. The Korean association of Computer Education conference proceeding, 23(2), 25-28.
  9. Gim, C. (2003). A comparative study on the reduction discourses of educational content in the 4th to 7th National Curriculum R & D reports. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 21(2), 105-122.
  10. Kim, C., & Jeon, Y. (2021). The core concepts of mathematics for AI and an analysis of mathematical contents in the textbook. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 24(4), 391-405.
  11. Kim, H.-G. & Koh, Y.-K. (2003). Mutual relationship between physical geographic vocabularies in 'social studies' and earth science vocabularies in 'science', elementary school textbooks. Journal of the Korea Association of Geographic and Environmental Education, 11(2), 41-49.
  12. Kim, H.-J., Chang, J.-E., & Kim, H.-B. (2010). Analysis of overlapping concepts in science subjects in high school : Focusing on the key concepts of biology. Biology Education, 38(3), 476-491.
  13. Kim, H.-K. (2021). A study on the revision direction of high school mathematics education for artificial intelligence literacy. Journal of Education & Culture, 27(3), 245-264.
  14. Kim, H. K. (2019). Computational thinking and mathematics education. Journal for Philosophy of Mathematics Education, 1(1), 17-28.
  15. Kim, H. K., Song, C. G., Lee, H., Rim, H., Jung, J., Choi, I., & Lee, K.-H. (2021). Restructuring high school mathematics according to the credit system-based curriculum framework: An initial suggestion. School Mathematics, 23(2), 291-315.
  16. Park, K. et al. (2015). A development of a draft II for the 2015 revised mathematics curriculum. KOFAC Report BD15120005.
  17. Park, M. S. (2018). A comparative study on mathematics exams for the college entrance in several countries-focusing on the matrix and vector domain [Master dissertation, Seoul National University].
  18. Shin, E. et al. (2011). A development of a draft for the 2009 revised mathematics curriculum. KOFAC.
  19. Lee, K. et al. (2022). A development of a draft for the 2022 revised mathematics curriculum. KOFAC.
  20. Lee, S., Ko, H., Kim, Y., Park, J., Song, S., Oh, S., ... & Hong, O. (2020). 2015 revision mathematics curriculum mathematics> development research. KOFAC Report BD20100001.
  21. Lee, J., Han, C., & Lim, W. (2023). Guidelines for big data projects in artificial intelligence mathematics education. The Mathematical Education, 62(2), 289-302.
  22. Chung, Y. O. et al. (2016). A comparative study of mathematics curriculum among the United States, Singapore, England, Japan, Australia and Korea. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 26(3), 371-402.
  23. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity [KOFAC] (2021). 2015 revised curriculum teaching and learning materials . KOFAC.
  24. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
  25. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM] (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. NCTM.
  26. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization [UNESCO] (2019). Planning education in the AI era: Lead the leap. Proceeding of International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education. Retrieved from https://en.unesco.org/themes/ict-education/ai-education-conference-2019
  27. Zhang, X. D. (2020). A matrix algebra approach to artificial intelligence. Springer Singapore.