벤처창업연구 (Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship)

  • 제18권4호
  • /
  • Pages.103-116
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1975-7557(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-9509(eISSN)
한국벤처창업학회 (The Korean Society of Business Venturing)
권호 표지

국내 IT 기업 내 리더십 유형이 기업의 혁신저항에 미치는 영향: 조직신뢰의 매개효과를 중심으로

The Effect of Leadership Type in Domestic IT Firms on Firms' Innovation Resistance: Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Organizational Trust

  • 배영준 (성균관대학교 기술경영학과) ;
  • 도성정 (경북대학교 융합기술경영학과) ;
  • 박현정 (성균관대학교 기술경영학과) ;
  • 박상혁 (경상국립대학교 창업대학원 창업학과)
  • Young Joon Bae (Department of Management of Technology, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Sungjeong Do (Graduate School of Convergence Technology Management, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Hyeonjeong Park (Department of Management of Technology, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Sanghyeok Park (Gyeongsang National University)
  • 투고 : 2023.07.06
  • 심사 : 2023.08.28
  • 발행 : 2023.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 혁신활동에만 집중되어 있던 기존연구의 한계를 벗어나 혁신의 확산과 성공을 위해 혁신저항과 리더십의 중요한 역할을 기반으로 조직신뢰의 매개효과와 리더십 종류(공유 리더십, 수직적 리더십)에 따른 혁신저항과의 영향력 차이를 분석하는데 목적이 있다. 연구 모형의 검증을 위해 혁신 중요도가 높은 국내 IT기업 임직원을 대상으로 286부의 설문지를 수집하여 데이터를 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 공유 리더십과 수직적 리더십 모두 혁신저항과 부(-)의 관계가 있는 것으로 나타났으며, 조직신뢰도 혁신저항과의 관계에서 매개효과가 있음을 확인하였다. 또한 공유 리더십이 수직적 리더십에 비해 혁신저항과 좀 더 강한 부(-)의 관계를 형성하고 혁신저항을 낮추는데 공유리더십이 더욱 효과적이라는 것을 알 수 있었다. 특히 IT 스타트업에 존재하는 혁신저항을 극복하는데 조직의 신뢰를 바탕으로 수직적 리더십과 공유 리더십을 상호보완적으로 적용해 보도록 제안하는 바이다.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between vertical leadership and shared leadership, organizational trust and innovation resistance. For this purpose, a regression analysis was conducted based on data from 286 questionnaires completed by employees working in IT companies. As a result of the analysis, both shared leadership and vertical leadership showed a negative relationship with innovation resistance. For organizational trust, it was confirmed that there was a mediating effect in the relationship with innovation resistance. Shared leadership seems to form a stronger negative relationship with innovation resistance than vertical leadership, it was found that shared leadership is more effective in lowering innovation resistance. Therefore, if the strengths of vertical leadership and shared leadership are applied complementary to each other on the basis of organizational trust in promoting innovation, it will be a good way to overcome innovation resistance, which is a barrier to innovation success. To overcome innovation resistance, especially in IT startups, we propose the complementary application of vertical leadership and shared leadership based on organizational trust.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahearne, M., Mathieu, J., & Rapp, A.(2005). To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance. Journal of Applied psychology, 90(5), 945.
  2. Amabile, T. M.(1998). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review on breakthrough thinking, 1-29.
  3. Aryee, S., Budhwar, P. S., & Chen, Z. X.(2002). Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: Test of a social exchange model. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial. Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 23(3), 267-285.
  4. Avolio, B. J., Sivasubramaniam, N., Murry, W. D., Jung, D., & Garger, J. W.(2003). Development and preliminary validation of a team multifactor leadership questionnaire. Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership, 143-172.
  5. Barney, J.(1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  6. Barney, J. B., & Hansen, M. H.(1994). Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage. Strategic management journal, 15(1), 175-190.
  7. Binci, D., Cerruti, C., & Braganza, A.(2016). Do vertical and shared leadership need each other in change management?. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 37(5), 558-578.
  8. Bouty, I.(2000). Interpersonal and interaction influences on informal resource exchanges between R&D researchers across organizational boundaries. Academy of Management journal, 43(1), 50-65.
  9. Bovey, W. H., & Hede, A.(2001). Resistance to organisational change: the role of defence mechanisms. Journal of managerial psychology, 16(7), 534-548.
  10. Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A.(2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. Strategic Management.
  11. Carson, J. B., Tesluk, P. E., & Marrone, J. A.(2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of management Journal, 50(5), 1217-1234.
  12. Chen, G., Sharma, P. N., Edinger, S. K., Shapiro, D. L., & Farh, J. L.(2011). Motivating and demotivating forces in teams: cross-level influences of empowering leadership and relationship conflict. Journal of applied psychology, 96(3), 541.
  13. Dansereau Jr, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J.(1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational behavior and human performance, 13(1), 46-78.
  14. Day, D. V.(2000). Leadership development: A review in context. The leadership quarterly, 11(4), 581-613. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00061-8
  15. Day, D. V., & Harrison, M. M.(2007). A multilevel, identity-based approach to leadership development. Human Resource Management Review, 17(4), 360-373.
  16. Dyer, L., Lipsky, D. B., & Kochan, T. A.(1977). Union attitudes toward management cooperation.
  17. Ensley, M. D., Hmieleski, K. M., & Pearce, C. L.(2006). The importance of vertical and shared leadership within new venture top management teams: Implications for the performance of startups. The leadership quarterly, 17(3), 217-231.
  18. Go, M. J., & Han, J. H.(2020). The Effects of Empowering Leadership on Organizational Members' Job Enthusiasm and Job Satisfaction: Focusing on the Moderating Effect of Behavioral Integrity. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 15(4), 217-230.
  19. Hackman, J. R., & Morris, C. G.(1975). Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. Advances in experimental social psychology, 8, 45-99.
  20. Henle, C. A.(2005). Predicting workplace deviance from the interaction between organizational justice and personality. Journal of managerial issues, 247-263.
  21. Hoch, J. E., Pearce, C. L., & Welzel, L.(2010). Is the most effective team leadership shared? The impact of shared leadership, age diversity, and coordination on team performance. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9(3), 105.
  22. Hong, W. K., & Ahn, K. Y.(2016). The relationship between empowerment and innovative behavior of members of SMEs and the moderating effect of psychological ownership. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 11(3), 145-155.
  23. Hosmer, L. T.(1995). Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. Academy of management Review, 20(2), 379-403. https://doi.org/10.2307/258851
  24. Hsu, J. S. C., Li, Y., & Sun, H.(2017). Exploring the interaction between vertical and shared leadership in information systems development projects. International Journal of Project Management, 35(8), 1557-1572.
  25. Huy, Q. N.(1999). Emotional capability, emotional intelligence, and radical change. Academy of Management review, 24(2), 325-345. https://doi.org/10.2307/259085
  26. Hwangbo. Y., & Bae, G. S.(2017). An exploratory study on the effects of in-house entrepreneurship and human resource innovation on corporate innovation activities and non-financial performance. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 12(4), 1-14.
  27. Janssen, O.(2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and organizational psychology, 73(3), 287-302. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038
  28. Jeong, S. B.(2020). The relationship between leader's charismatic leadership and leader trust. Korea Local Autonomy Study, 22(2), 101-122.
  29. Jin, H., Kang, U. R., Eom, D. W., Ye, J. E., Baek, S. O., Lee, B. H. & Ryu, J. S.(2011). SERI-type organizational culture change management model. Samsung Economic Research Institute.
  30. Kim, D. S., Baek, G. B. & Kim, B. Y.(2014). Verification of the mediating effect of psychological empowerment on the relationship between issue leadership and performance. Personnel Organization Research, 22(3), 99-136.
  31. Kim, J. E.(2011). Structural relationships among hotel staff's satisfaction with information, freedom of expression, reflection of staff's opinions, trust in management, and attitude toward organizational change. Culinary Science & Hospitality Research, 17(4), 185-203.
  32. Kim, J. J., & Park, G. G.(2008). A multidimensional approach to member resistance to organizational change. Personnel Organization Research, 16(3), 1-41.
  33. Kim, K. G., Mun, M., & Jo, Y. H.(2013). The relationship between organizational members' perception of organizational vision and attitude toward organizational change-mediated role of organizational trust. Human Resource Management Research, 20(3), 115-143.
  34. Kim, M. J., & Jeong, Y. J.(2016). A study on the antecedents of shared leadership and its effectiveness. Corporate Management Research, 23(6), 145-168.
  35. Kim, S. H., Ji, S. H., & Kang, Y. S.(2014). The mediating effect of multidimensional resistance in the relationship between empowering leadership and innovative behavior. Human Resource Management Research, 21(5), 93-114.
  36. Kim, G. S.(2007). Understanding of Process Quality in Service Organizations and 6 Sigma Model Development: Using Structural Equation Model Analysis. Journal of Quality Management, 35(2), 84-99.
  37. Konovsky, M. A., & Pugh, S. D.(1994). Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of management journal, 37(3), 656-669.
  38. Kwon, J. S.(2004). The Anna Karenina Law of Korean Management. Papers presented by the Korean Society of Industrial Management, 259-263.
  39. Lee, J. B., Park, M. S., & Lee, D. H.(2009). Effects of transformational and transactional leadership on organizational members' innovative behavior: Mediating effect of empowerment. Organization and Personnel Management Research, 33(4), 155-178.
  40. Lee, J. G.(2018). The Effects of Shared Leadership on Job Performance and Innovative Behavior: Focusing on the Mediating Effects of Positive Psychological Capital and Shared Mental. doctoral dissertation, Cheongju University.
  41. Lee, J. W., Cho, J. Y., & Park, S. H.(2009). The relationship between organizational fairness and trust perceived by teachers. Education Research, 7(1), 73-95.
  42. Lee, Y. S.(1999). Cases of trust enhancement program development for organizational stabilization after restructuring, collection of papers presented at the Korea Human Resources Development Conference. Korea Management Association.
  43. Lee, Y. S., Oh, D. G., & Seo, Y. W.(2004). Determinants of company trust and superior trust. Journal of the Korean Psychological Association: Industry and Organization, 17(2), 147-186.
  44. Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A.(1985). Trust as a social reality. Social forces, 63(4), 967-985.
  45. Maynard, M. T., Mathieu, J. E., Marsh, W. M., & Ruddy, T. M.(2007). A multilevel investigation of the influences of employees' resistance to empowerment. Human performance, 20(2), 147-171.
  46. McCauley, D. P., & Kuhnert, K. W.(1992). A theoretical review and empirical investigatiomn of employee trust in management. Public Administration Quarterly, 265-284.
  47. Mehra, A., Smith, B. R., Dixon, A. L., & Robertson, B. (2006). Distributed leadership in teams: The network of leadership perceptions and team performance. The leadership quarterly, 17(3), 232-245.
  48. Oreg, S.(2006). Personality, context, and resistance to organizational change. European journal of work and organizational psychology, 15(1), 73-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320500451247
  49. Park, J. K., & Lee, S. B.(2017). A Study on the Impact of Firm's Technology Innovation Activities on Innovation Performance: Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Innovation Resistance. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 12(5), 89-99.
  50. Park, T. H., & Park, K. H.(2012). A Model Study on the Influencing Factors of Technological Innovation in the IT Industry. Digital Convergence Research, 10(5), 177-183.
  51. Park, W. W.(2007). Introduction status, performance and improvement direction of team system in Korea. Seoul National University Management Research Institute, 41, 59-97.
  52. Pearce, C. L., & Conger, J. A.(2003). All those years ago. Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership, 1-18.
  53. Pearce, C. L., & Sims Jr, H. P.(2002). Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. Group dynamics: Theory, research, and practice, 6(2), 172.
  54. Pearce, C. L., Conger, J. A., & Locke, E. A.(2008). Shared leadership theory. The leadership quarterly, 19(5), 622-628.
  55. Ram, S.(1987). A model of innovation resistance. ACR North American Advances.
  56. Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of management review, 23(3), 393-404.
  57. Seo, H. M.(2015). The effect of sports organization members' perception of organizational fairness on innovation resistance: An analysis of the mediating effect of organizational trust. doctoral dissertation, Sungkyunkwan University.
  58. Song, W. S., & Kim, Y. B.(2010). A Study on the Relationship between Organizational Trust and Innovative Behavior: Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Organizational Commitment. Social Science Research, 26(3), 127-151.
  59. Susanto, A. B.(2008). Organizational readiness for change: A case study on change readiness in a manufacturing company in Indonesia. WWW.IB-TS.ORG.
  60. Tesluk, P. E., Vance, R. J., & Mathieu, J. E.(1999). Examining employee involvement in the context of participative work environments. Group & Organization Management, 24(3), 271-299.
  61. Vecchio, R. P., Justin, J. E., & Pearce, C. L.(2010). Empowering leadership: An examination of mediating mechanisms within a hierarchical structure. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(3), 530-542.
  62. Wallace, J. C., Johnson, P. D., Mathe, K., & Paul, J.(2011). Structural and psychological empowerment climates, performance, and the moderating role of shared felt accountability: A managerial perspective. Journal of applied psychology, 96(4), 840.
  63. Wang, D., Waldman, D. A., & Zhang, Z.(2014). A meta-analysis of shared leadership and team effectiveness. Journal of applied psychology, 99(2), 181.
  64. Yang, D. M., Roh, H. J. & Sim, D. S.(2012). The Effects of Shared Leadership in Project Teams on Team Efficacy and Team Commitment: Verification of Mediating Effects of Task Alignment and Work Division. Corporate Management Research, 19(2), 127-147.
  65. Yang, D. M., & Sim, D. S.(2014). The effect of vertical leadership and shared leadership on team engagement and team performance. Papers presented at the conference of the Korean Business Administration Association, 163-178.
  66. Yukl, G.(1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. The leadership quarterly, 10(2), 285-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00013-2
  67. Yukl, G., & Mahsud, R.(2010). Why flexible and adaptive leadership is essential. Consulting Psychology Journal: practice and research, 62(2), 81.