DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Research Ethics and Research Ethics Education in Aviation Tourism Research

  • Hye-Yoon PARK (Department of Aviation Tourism, Hanseo University)
  • Received : 2023.07.25
  • Accepted : 2023.09.05
  • Published : 2023.09.30

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to examine the implications of aviation tourism by considering practical and ethical issues in order to achieve academic goals for research ethics. Through this, we intend to derive the direction of research ethics in aviation tourism in the future. Research Design, data and methodology: This study examined ethical issues to examine the current status of research ethics in consideration of the goals of aviation tourism and to analyze and explore the status of research ethics, including various research results and researchers. Results: Aviation tourism is focused on the autonomy of research without strict sanctions. There was a perception that there was no monitoring or control of research ethics, and related scholars did not need to discuss research ethics because the establishment of an academic system was a priority. However, it is now responsible for complying with research ethics limited to integrity and leading research ethics education in domestic aviation tourism. Conclusions: Research ethics problems that may arise in aviation tourism research were explored and issues and tasks were derived. Aviation tourism needs to develop into a more responsible research culture, such as redefining research ethics regulations, changing research culture, and raising researchers' ethical awareness

Keywords

References

  1. Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2019). Ethics in business research. Oxford University Press.
  2. Dennis, S., Garrett, P., Yim, H., Hamm, J., Osth, A. F., Sreekumar, V., & Stone, B. (2019). Privacy versus open science. Behavior research methods, 51, 1839-1848.
  3. Gibson, S., Benson, O., & Brand, S. L. (2013). Talking about suicide: Confidentiality and anonymity in qualitative research. Nursing ethics, 20(1), 18-29,
  4. Husband, G. (2020). Ethical Data Collection and Recognizing the Impact of Semi-Structured Interviews on Research Respondents. Education Sciences, 10(8), 206.
  5. Hwang, H. J., Kim, D. H., Youn, M. K., Lee, J. W., & Lee, J. H. (2014). The Standard of Judgment on Plagiarism in Research Ethics and the Guideline of Global Journals for KODISA. Journal of Distribution Science, 12(6), 15-20.
  6. Hwang, H.J. (2022). Ethical Issues in Business Marketing. Research. Journal of Research and Publication Ethics, 3(2), 1-5.
  7. Kang, E., & Hwang, H. J. (2021). Ethical Conducts in Qualitative Research Methodology: Participant Observation and Interview Process. Journal of Research and Publication Ethics, 2(2), 5-10.
  8. Kang, E.G., & Hwang, H.J. (2023). The Importance of Anonymity and Confidentiality for Conducting Survey. Research. Journal of Research and Publication Ethics, 4(1), 1-7.
  9. Kim, D.G & Kim, H.S.(2014). In the study of sports science Issues and Challenges of Bioethics. Journal of Korean Philosophic Society for Sport and Dance, 22(4), 94-115.
  10. Novak, A. (2014). Anonymity, confidentiality, privacy, and identity: The ties that bind and break in communication research. Review of communication, 14(1), 36-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2014.942351
  11. Sutton, J., & Austin, Z. (2015). Qualitative research: Data collection, analysis, and management. The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy, 68(3), 226-231.
  12. Vainio, A. (2013). Beyond research ethics: Anonymity as 'ontology','analysis' and 'independence'. Qualitative Research, 13(6), 685-698. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112459669
  13. Youn, M. K. Lee, J. H. Kim, Y. E. Yang, H. C., Hwang, H. J., Kim, D. H., & Lee, J. W. (2015). KODISA Journals and Strategies. Journal of Distribution Science, 13(3), 5-9.