대한건축학회논문집 (Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea)

  • 제39권8호
  • /
  • Pages.67-78
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 2733-6239(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-6247(eISSN)
대한건축학회 (Architectural Institute of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

건축재료의 시각적 질감 속성에 관한 인지 특성 연구 - 결, 입자, 패턴을 중심으로 -

Exploring the Cognitive Attributes of Visual Texture in Architectural Materials - Focused on the Vein, Grain, Pattern -

  • Chang, Ze-Yuan (Dept. of Interior & Environmental Design, Pusan National University) ;
  • Han, Jeong-won (Dept. of Interior & Environmental Design, Pusan National University)
  • 투고 : 2023.05.20
  • 심사 : 2023.08.07
  • 발행 : 2023.08.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study aims to discern the distinctive attributes of visual texture in architectural materials, and subsequently analyze the cognitive trends in visual perception, distinguished by the target audience. Three distinct categories of texture attributes were extracted from various building materials, followed by a cognitive experiment involving 120 participants, accounting for both their academic majors and genders. The results indicated the vein image, referred to as I-V, a cognitive inclination emerged towards eliciting sensations of lightness, flexibility, naturalness, stability, universality, and comfort. Conversely, the grain image, referred to as I-G, exhibited a visual effect imbued with three-dimensionality and an uneven surface, conveyed through the texture of the grains. When examining the vertical and horizontal pattern, referred to as I-P1, participants perceived a sense of stability and orderliness, while the diagonal pattern, referred to as I-P2, was characterized by a dynamic and free-flowing essence. In terms of the cognitive attributes pertinent to distinct subject groups, a notable difference in cognitive perception was detected predominantly in the I-V category, more prominently attributed to variations in design majors rather than gender differences. This distinction was particularly pronounced in the context of physical properties. For the I-G category, discernible cognitive biases were noticeable primarily within the male design-major cohort, with minimal variations observed in other groups. Similarly, cognitive biases were evident in the male design-major subset for I-P1, primarily within the realm of physical characteristics. In contrast, for I-P2, significant differences in cognitive attributes arose based on design-major status, where cognitive variations of physical properties exceeded those related to material expressive properties.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 1.kalin,., Yildirim, K., Wilson, C., & Kilicoglu, O. (2009).rchitecturend engineering students' evaluations of house facades: Preference, complexitynd impressiveness. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(1), 124-132.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.05.005
  2. 2.nderson, B. L. (2011). Visual perception of materials and surfaces. Current Biology, 21(24), 978-983.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.11.022
  3. 3.rslan, D. K., Yildirim, K., & Gulseker, E. (2018). Investigation ofrchitectnd non-architect participants' perceptual evaluations on different period mosque facades. ICONARP International Journal ofrchitecturend Planning, 6(2), 358-370.  https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2018.58
  4. Baumgartner, E., Wiebel, C. B., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2013). Visualnd haptic representations of material properties. Multisensory Research, 26(5), 429-455.  https://doi.org/10.1163/22134808-00002429
  5. Cosgun, B., Yildirim, K., & Hidayetoglu, M. L. (2022). Effect of wall covering materials on the perception of cafe environments. Facilities, 40(3/4), 214-232.  https://doi.org/10.1108/F-07-2021-0060
  6. Chen, X., Shao, F., Barnes, C. J., Childs, T., & Henson, B. (2009). Exploring relationships between touch perceptionnd surface physical properties. International Journal of Design, 3(2), 67-76. 
  7. Choi, J. K., & Kim, J. Y. (2019). The characteristics of spatial emotion throughnalyzing survey questionnaires according to the visual stimuli of finishing materials. Journal of the Korean Institute of Interior Design, 28(1), 95-105.  https://doi.org/10.14774/JKIID.2019.28.1.095
  8. Chung, M. Y. (2000). Study for Using the Texture of Cortex : The Modifi Cation of Raising Napping Textile to use Burning Effect. Master's thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul. 
  9. De Matteis, F. (2020). Affective Spaces: Architecture and the Living Body. Routledge.
  10. Degraen, D., Piovarci, M., Bickel, B., & Kruger, A. (2021). Capturing tactile properties of real surfaces for haptic reproduction. Proceedings of the 34th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, 954-971. 
  11. Deregowski, J. B. (1989). Real spacend represented space: Cross-cultural perspectives. Behavioralnd Brain Sciences, 12(1), 51-74.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00024286
  12. Fleming, R. W. (2014). Visual perception of materials and their properties. Vision Research, 94, 62-75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2013.11.004
  13. Fleming, R. W. (2017). Material perception.nnual Review of Vision Science, 3, 365-388.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-vision-102016-061429
  14. Garip, E., & Seymen, B. (2021). Research for evaluating perception of concrete material by using visual research methods in learning environments. A|Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 18(1), 17-28. 
  15. Gibson, J. J. (1978). The ecological approach to the visual perception of pictures. Leonardo, 11(3), 227-235.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1574154
  16. Guo, X., Asano, C. M., Asano, A., Kurita, T., & Li, L. (2012). Analysis of texture characteristics associated with visual complexity perception. Optical Review, 19(5), 306-314.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10043-012-0047-1
  17. Hesselgren, S. (1975). Man's Perception of Man-made Environment: An Architectural Theory. Lund: Studentlitteratur. 
  18. Jung, H. W., & Oh, J. A. (2013). A study on the tactile sensation of interior finishing materials. Journal of Cultural Product & Design, (34), 135-147. 
  19. Kim, E. J. (2003). Study on the Material Expressive Characteristics of the Contemporary Interlor Design According to the Paradigmatic Variation: Focused on the Analysis of Works since Mld-1980's. Master's thesis. Konkuk University, Seoul. 
  20. Kim, S. H. (2009).　 A study on the tensity from texture expression of finishing materials in architectural space. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 25(4), 25-32. 
  21. Kim, H. S., & Kim, J. Y. (2022). Perception change and sensibility vocabulary of exposed concrete as an interior finishing material: Focused on late 1990's~mid-2010's. Journal of the Korean Institute of Interior Design, 31(2), 32-40.  https://doi.org/10.14774/JKIID.2022.31.2.032
  22. Klatzky, R. L., Pawluk, D., & Peer, A. (2013). Haptic perception of material properties and implications for applications. Proceedings of the IEEE, 101(9), 2081-2092. 
  23. Lee, H. S. (2010). A Study on the Effect of Texture on Visual Tactility in CGI Stereoscopic Films. Ph.D. Dissertation, Dongguk University, Seoul. 
  24. Lee, J. S., Jung, H. W., & Lee, H. S. (2016). A sensibility evaluation study on interior space of exposed concrete finish: Focused on the Kim Ok Gil Memorial Hall restaurant. Journal of the Korean Institute of Interior Design, 25(5), 121-129. 
  25. Muezzinoglu, M. K., Hidayetoglu, M. L., & Yildirim, K. (2021). The effects of light color temperatures on students' perceptual evaluations in design studios. Color Research & Application, 46(5), 1006-1018.  https://doi.org/10.1002/col.22654
  26. Okamoto, S., Nagano, H., Kidoma, K., & Yamada, Y. (2016). Specification of individuality in causal relationships among texture-related attributes, emotions, and preferences. International Journal of Affective Engineering, 15(1), 11-19.  https://doi.org/10.5057/ijae.IJAE-D-15-00018
  27. Paramita, K. D. (2022). A sensorial foray into architecture. ARSNET, 2(1), 2-9.  https://doi.org/10.7454/arsnet.v2i1.52
  28. Park, M. Y. (2009). Study on the Value of Visual Expression Element Difference of Juice Package Design that Utilizes Visual Tactility. Master's thesis, Hanyang University, Seoul. 
  29. Seo, J. E. (2011). A study on mixing expression methods of finish materials for visual differentiation in housing space. Journal of the Korean Institute of Interior Design, 20(2), 147-155. 
  30. Shiraishi, K. (1987). Optimized Model (S. Kim, Trans.). Monthly Design Press. (Original work published 1933). 
  31. Tiest, W. M. B., & Kappers, A. M. (2007). Haptic and visual perception of roughness. Acta Psychologica, 124(2), 177-189.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.03.002
  32. Wang, C., Lu, W., Ohno, R., & Gu, Z. (2020). Effect of wall texture on perceptual spaciousness of indoor space. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(11), 4177. 
  33. Whitaker, T. A., Simoes-Franklin, C., & Newell, F. N. (2008). Vision and touch: Independent or integrated systems for the perception of texture?. Brain Research, 1242, 59-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2008.05.037