DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Determining the adjusting bias in reactor pressure vessel embrittlement trend curve using Bayesian multilevel modelling

  • Gyeong-Geun Lee (Materials Safety Technology Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI)) ;
  • Bong-Sang Lee (Materials Safety Technology Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI)) ;
  • Min-Chul Kim (Materials Safety Technology Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI)) ;
  • Jong-Min Kim (Materials Safety Technology Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI))
  • Received : 2022.12.25
  • Accepted : 2023.04.29
  • Published : 2023.08.25

Abstract

A sophisticated Bayesian multilevel model for estimating group bias was developed to improve the utility of the ASTM E900-15 embrittlement trend curve (ETC) to assess the conditions of nuclear power plants (NPPs). For multilevel model development, the Baseline 22 surveillance dataset was basically classified into groups based on the NPP name, product form, and notch orientation. By including the notch direction in the grouping criteria, the developed model could account for TTS differences among NPP groups with different notch orientations, which have not been considered in previous ETCs. The parameters of the multilevel model and biases of the NPP groups were calculated using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo method. As the number of data points within a group increased, the group bias approached the mean residual, resulting in reduced credible intervals of the mean, and vice versa. Even when the number of surveillance test data points was less than three, the multilevel model could estimate appropriate biases without overfitting. The model also allowed for a quantitative estimate of the changes in the bias and prediction interval that occurred as a result of adding more surveillance test data. The biases estimated through the multilevel model significantly improved the performance of E900-15.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the ASTM E10.02 committee for providing the dataset for this study. This work was supported by National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (Ministry of Science and ICT) (No. RS-2022-00144399).

References

  1. U.S. NRC, Regulatory Guide 1.99 Revision 1: Effects of Residual Elements on Predicted Radiation Damage to Reactor Vessels Materials, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC, 1977.
  2. J.F. Perrin, R.A. Wullaert, G.R. Odette, P.M. Lombrozo, Physically based regression correlations of embrittlement data from reactor pressure vessel surveillance programs. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/5336511, 1984. Final report.
  3. G.L. Guthrie, Charpy trend-curve development based on PWR surveillance data, Nucl. Eng. Des. 86 (1985) 79-86, https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(85)90211-0.
  4. U.S. NRC, Regulatory Guide 1.99 Revision 2: Radiation Embrittlement of Reactor Vessel Materials, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC, 1988.
  5. E.D. Eason, J.E. Wright, G.R. Odette, NUREG/CR-6551: Improved Embrittlement Correlations for Reactor Pressure Vessel Steels, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC, 1998.
  6. E.D. Eason, J.E. Wright, G.R. Odette, NP-3319: Physically Based Regression Correlations of Embrittlement Data from Reactor Pressure Vessel Surveillance Programs, Electric Power Research Institute, 1998.
  7. JEAC, JEAC4201-2007: Method of Surveillance Tests for Structural Materials of Nuclear Reactors, Japan Electric Association, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 2007.
  8. M. Kirk, A wide-range embrittlement trend curve for western reactor pressure vessel steels, in: Effects of Radiation on Nuclear Materials: 25th Volume, ASTM International, 2013, pp. 20-51, https://doi.org/10.1520/STP103999.
  9. E10 Committee, ASTM E900-15e2: guide for Predicting Radiation-Induced Transition Temperature Shift in Reactor Vessel Materials. https://doi.org/10.1520/E0900-15E02, 2021. ASTM standards.
  10. G.-G. Lee, M.-C. Kim, B.-S. Lee, Machine learning modeling of irradiation embrittlement in low alloy steel of nuclear power plants, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 53 (2021) 4022-4032, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2021.06.014.
  11. D. Ferreno, M. Serrano, M. Kirk, J.A. Sainz-Aja, Prediction of the transition-temperature shift using machine learning algorithms and the plotter database, Metals 12 (2022) 186, https://doi.org/10.3390/met12020186.
  12. N. Soneda, K. Nakashima, K. Nishida, K. Dohi, High Fluence Surveillance Data and Recalibration of RPV Embrittlement Correlation Method in Japan, American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2013-98076.
  13. PWROG-20025-NP, Methodology for Adjusting Reactor Pressure Vessel Embrittlement Predictions Using Heat-specific Surveillance Data, PWROG, 2020.
  14. E. Long, Methods to Address the Effects of Irradiation Embrittlement in Section XI of the ASME Code, 2021. MRP-462).
  15. R. McElreath, Statistical Rethinking: A Bayesian Course with Examples in R and Stan, CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, 2016.
  16. W.R. Gilks, S. Richardson, David Spiegelhalter (Eds.), Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice, Chapman; Hall/CRC, 1995, https://doi.org/10.1201/b14835.
  17. R Core Team, R, A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2020. https://www.R-project.org/.
  18. P.-C. Burkner, Brms : an R package for bayesian multilevel models using stan, J. Stat. Software 80 (2017), https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v080.i01.
  19. E28 Committee, ASTM E23-18: test methods for notched bar impact testing of metallic materials, ASTM International, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1520/E0023-18.
  20. E08 Committee, ASTM e399-20a: test method for linear-elastic plane-strain fracture toughness of metallic materials. https://doi.org/10.1520/E0399-20A, 2020. ASTM International.
  21. D. Ferreno, M. Kirk, M. Serrano, J.A. Sainz-Aja, Assessment of the generalization ability of the ASTM e900-15 embrittlement trend curve by means of Monte Carlo cross-validation, Metals 12 (2022) 481, https://doi.org/10.3390/met12030481.
  22. M. Kirk, D. Ferreno, jose A. Sainz-Aja, Evaluation of the ASTM e900-15 ΔT41J prediction equation in light of new data, April 19-22, in: ASTM Symposium - Radiation Embrittlement Trend Curves/Equations and Their Use for RPV Integrity Evaluations, Prague, Czech Republic, 2022.
  23. S. Ortner, M. Brumovsky, Age 60+ - applicability of ageing related data bases and methodologies for ensuring safe operation of LWR beyond 60 years, V06AT06A075, in: Volume 6A: Materials and Fabrication, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Waikoloa, Hawaii, USA, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2017-65283.