DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Reduction of the Femoral Head First, and Assembly of the MUTARS® Device in Case of Impossible Reduction during Total Hip Arthroplasty

  • Jee Young Lee (Department of Microbiology, College of Medicine, Kosin University) ;
  • Ye Jun Lee (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University) ;
  • Gyu Min Kong (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University)
  • Received : 2023.06.04
  • Accepted : 2023.08.21
  • Published : 2023.12.31

Abstract

Dislocation after a total hip arthroplasty occurs in approximately 1% of patients; however, the frequency is much higher after revision surgery. To prevent dislocation, use of a larger femoral head is recommended, and a dual mobility femoral head has been introduced. However, reducing the dual mobility femoral head to the acetabular component is difficult in cases involving contracture in the soft tissue around the joint. A 72-year-old male patient who developed a periprosthetic joint infection underwent two-stage revision surgery using MUTARS®. Two months after the revision, the hip joint became dislocated and manual reduction was attempted; however, dislocation occurred again. During another revision using a dual mobility bearing, the soft tissue around the hip joint was too tight to reduce. The problem was overcome by first repositioning the dual mobility head into the acetabular socket, followed by assembly of the diaphyseal portion of the implant.

Keywords

References

  1. Faldini C, Stefanini N, Fenga D, et al. How to prevent dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the risk factors and a focus on treatment options. J Orthop Traumatol. 2018;19:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-018-0510-2
  2. Daly PJ, Morrey BF. Operative correction of an unstable total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:1334-43.
  3. Howie DW, Holubowycz OT, Middleton R; Large Articulation Study Group. Large femoral heads decrease the incidence of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:1095-102. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.00570
  4. Randelli F, Fioruzzi A, Scaltrito L, Brioschi M, Ayeni OR, Randelli PS. Direct anterior approach and dual mobility cup: the "head-first" reduction technique: a technical note and early case series. Musculoskelet Surg. 2021;105:201-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-020-00641-3
  5. Hamadouche M, Kerboull L, Meunier A, Courpied JP, Kerboull M. Total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of ankylosed hips: a five to twenty-one-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:992-8. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200107000-00003
  6. Manson TT, Adrados M, Gililland JM, Mahmood BM, Samuel LT, Moskal JT. The role of dual-mobility components in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023;105:250-61. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.22.00185
  7. Sambri A, Parisi SC, Zunarelli R, et al. Megaprosthesis in non-oncologic settings-a systematic review of the literature. J Clin Med. 2023;12:4151. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12124151