한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제43권3호
  • /
  • Pages.277-294
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

과학 교사의 전문성 발달을 위한 기준 제안

A Suggestion of Standard for Science Teacher Professional Development

  • 투고 : 2023.05.09
  • 심사 : 2023.06.02
  • 발행 : 2023.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

과학 교육 연구자들은 기존의 과학 교사 전문성 발달(STPD: Sciecne Teacher Professional Development) 과정에서의 한계를 지적하면서 효율적인 STPD를 위한 다양한 관점을 논의해왔다. 이에 본 연구에서는 문헌 조사에 기초하여 효율적인 STPD를 위한 주요 이슈를 8개로 선정하고, 각 이슈에 대한 문헌 조사 내용을 정리하였다. 그리고 정리한 내용에 기초하여 STPD 기준 초안을 제안하였다. 제안 된 STPD 기준 초안을 이용하여 델파이 조사를 위한 질문지를 작성하였고, 2단계에 걸친 델파이 조사를 시행하였다. 델파이 조사에는 21명의 과학교육학자와 과학 교사가 참여하였고, 2단계 조사 결과 STPD 기준을 기술하는 모든 진술문의 타당성과 중요성에 대해서 높은 동의 정도를 얻을 수 있었다. 또한 변이계수와 내용타당도 비율에 대해서는 모든 진술문이 기준을 만족하였고, 수렴도와 합의도에 있어서는 2개 진술문을 제외한 모든 진술문이 기준을 만족하였다. 2개 진술문에 대해서는 델파이 조사에서 제안된 의견을 반영하여 수정하였고, 최종 STPD 기준에 포함하였다. 그 결과, 최종적으로 8개 영역에서 23개 진술문으로 구성된 STPD 기준을 개발하였고, 개발된 STPD 기준의 장단점과 활용방안 및 앞으로 필요한 개선방안, 그리고 후속 연구를 제안하였다.

Science education researchers have discussed more effective STPD(Science Teacher Professional Development) based on a variety of perspectives, pointing out the limitations of traditional STPD. In this study, we selected eight major issues for more efficient STPD based on the literature review, summarized the literature review contents for each issue, and proposed a draft STPD standard based on the literature review. Using the draft STPD standard, a questionnaire for the Delphi survey was developed and a two-phase Delphi survey was conducted. The questionnaire consisted of 25 statements describing the STPD standard, and respondents were asked to indicate the validity and importance of the statement on a Likert scale, followed by an explanation and suggestions for revision. Twenty-one science educators and science teachers participated in the Delphi survey, and the results of the second round of the survey showed high levels of agreement on the validity and importance of all statements describing the STPD standard. For the content validity ratio and coefficient of variation, all statements met the criteria, and for the convergence and consensus, all but two statements met the criteria. Two statements were revised to reflect comments from the Delphi survey and were included in the final STPD standard. As a result, we developed STPD standard consisting of 23 statements in eight categories, and we discussed the disadvantages and advantages of the developed STPD standard and how to utilize them, as well as suggestions for future improvement and research.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 2020년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NRF-2020S1A3A2A01095782).

참고문헌

  1. Abell, S. K. (2000). From professor to colleague: Creating a professional identity as collaborator in elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 548-562.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6<548::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-D
  2. Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105-1150). Lawrence Erlbaum. 
  3. Adey, P. (2004). The professional development of teachers: Practice and theory. Springer Science & Business Media. 
  4. Afdal, H. W., & Spernes, K. (2018). Designing and redesigning research-based teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 74, 215-228.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.05.011
  5. Allen, J. M., Butler-Mader, C., & Smith, R. A. (2010). A fundamental partnership: the experiences of practising teachers as lecturers in a pre-service teacher education programme. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 16(5), 615-632.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2010.507969
  6. Androusou, A., & Tsfaos, V. (2018). Aspects of the professional identity of preschool teachers in Greece: Investigating the role of teacher education and professional experience. Teacher Development, 22(4), 554-570. http://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2018.1438309. 
  7. Appleton, K. (2003). How do beginning primary school teachers cope with science? Toward an understanding of science teaching practice. Research in Science Education, 33(1), 1-25.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023666618800
  8. Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 10-20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
  9. Baird, J. R., Fensham, P. J., Gunstone, R. F., & White, R. T. (1991). The importance of reflection in improving science teaching and learning. Journal of' Research in Science Teaching, 28(2), 163-182.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280207
  10. Ball, D. L. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. The Elementary School Journal, 93(4), 373-397.  https://doi.org/10.1086/461730
  11. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
  12. Ball, L. D., & Forzani, F. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497-511.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109348479
  13. Beach, D., Bagley, C., Eriksson, A., & Player-Koro, C. (2014). Changing teacher education in Sweden: Using meta-ethnographic analysis to understand and describe policy making and educational changes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 44, 160-167.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.08.011
  14. Bevins, S., & Price, G. (2014). Collaboration between academics and teachers: a complex relationship. Educational Action Research, 22(2), 270-284, DOI: 10.1080/09650792.2013.869181 
  15. Biza, I., Nardi, E., & Joel, G. (2015). Balancing classroom management with mathematical learning: Using practice-based task design in mathematics teacher education. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 17(2), 182-198. 
  16. Black, A. L., & Halliwell, G. (2000). Accessing practical knowledge: How? why? Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 103-115.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(99)00045-1
  17. Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Stoll, L., Thomas, S., Wallace, M., Greenwood, A., ... & Smith, M. (2005). Creating and sustaining effective professional learning communities (Vol. 637). Research report RR637. University of Bristol. 
  18. Borko H, Jacobs J and Koellner K (2010). Contemporary approaches to teacher professional development. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw, (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education. volume 7 (pp. 548-556). Elsevier. 
  19. Broekkamp, H., & Van Hout-Wolters, B. (2007). The gap between educational research and practice: A literature review, symposium, and questionnaire. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(3), 203-220.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610701626127
  20. Brookhart, S. M., & Loadman, W. E. (1992). School-university collaboration: Across cultures. Teaching Education, 4(2), 53-68.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1047621920040207
  21. Burridge, P., Hooley, N., & Neal, G. (2016). Creating frames of practice for teacher education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 44(2), 156-171. doi: 10.1080/1359866X.2015.1041877. 
  22. Butler, D. L., Lauscher, H. N., Jarvis-Selinger, S., & Beckingham, B. (2004). Collaboration and self-Regulation in teachers' professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(5), 435-455.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.04.003
  23. Caena, F. (2011). Literature review Quality in Teachers' continuing professional development. European Commission, 2, 20. 
  24. Capps, D. K., Crawford, B. A., & Constas, M. A. (2012). A review of empirical literature on inquiry professional development: Alignment with best practices and a critique of the findings. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(3), 291-318. 
  25. Carlone, H. B., & Webb, S. M. (2006). On (not) overcoming our history of hierarchy: Complexities of university/school collaboration. Science Education, 90(3), 544-568. 
  26. Carlson, H. L. (1999). From practice to theory: A social constructivist approach to teacher education. Teachers and Teaching, 5, 203-218.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1354060990050205
  27. Carlson, J., Daehler, K. R., Alonzo, A. C., Barendsen, E., Berry, A., ... & Wilson, C. D. (2019). The refinded consensus model of pedagogical content knowledge in science education. In A. Hume et al. (Eds.), Reposioning pedagogical content knowledge in teachers' knowledge for teaching science (pp. 118-141) [kindle version]. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 
  28. Chaharbashloo, H., Gholami, K., Aliasgari, M., Talebzadeh, H., & Mousapour, N. (2020). Analytical reflection on teachers' practical knowledge: A case study of exemplary teachers in an educational reform context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 87, 102931. 
  29. Cheng, M. M., Cheng, A. Y., & Tang, S. Y. (2010). Closing the gap between the theory and practice of teaching: Implications for teacher education programmes in Hong Kong. Journal of Education for Teaching, 36(1), 91-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607470903462222 
  30. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24(1), 249-305. 
  31. Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (2000). Narrative understandings of teacher knowledge. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 15(4), 315-331. 
  32. Connolly, P., Keenan, C., & Urbanska, K. (2018). The trials of evidence-based practice in education: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials in education research 1980-2016. Educational Research, 60(3), 276-291.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2018.1493353
  33. Cooper, R., Loughran, J., & Berry, A. (2015). Science teachers' PCK: Understanding sophistigated practice. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 60-73) [kindle version]. Routledge. 
  34. Cordingley, P., Bell, M., Rundell, B., & Evans, D. (2003). The impact of collaborative CPD on classroom teaching and learning. Research evidence in education library. Version 1.1. EPPI Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.
  35. Crippen, K.J., Biesinger, K.D., & Ebert, E.K., (2010). Using professional development to achieve classroom reform and science proficiency: an urban success story from southern Nevada, USA. Professional Development in Education, 36(4), 637-661. 
  36. Danielson, C. (2007). Enhancing professional practice. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. 
  37. Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 597-604. 
  38. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. 
  39. De Corte, E. (2000). Marrying theory building and the improvement of school practice: A permanent challenge for instructional psychology. Learning and Instruction, 10(3), 249-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(99)00029-8 
  40. Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers' professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38, 181-199.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
  41. Desimone, L. M., & Pak, K. (2017). Instructional coaching as high-quality professional development. Theory into Practice, 56(1), 3-12.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1241947
  42. Dinkelman, T. (2000). An inquiry into the development if critical reflection in secondary student teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education 16, 195-222.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(99)00055-4
  43. Dogan, S., Pringle, R., & Mesa, J. (2016). The impacts of professional learning communities on science teachers' knowledge, practice and student learning: A review. Professional Development in Education, 42(4), 569-588.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2015.1065899
  44. Farley-Ripple, E., May, H., Karpyn, A., Tilley, K., & McDonough, K. (2018). Rethinking connections between research and practice in education: A conceptual framework. Educational Researcher, 47(4), 235-245.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X18761042
  45. Fenstermacher, G. D. (1994). Chapter 1: The knower and the known: The nature of knowledge in research on teaching. Review of Research in Education, 20(1), 3-56.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X020001003
  46. Gage, N. L., & Needels, M. C. (1989). Process-product research on teaching: A review of criticisms. The Elementary School Journal, 89(3), 253-300.  https://doi.org/10.1086/461577
  47. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945.  https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915
  48. Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK:Results of the thinking from the PCK summit. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran(Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 28-42). Routledge Press. 
  49. Glenberg, A. M. (2010). Embodiment as a unifying perspective for psychology. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1(4), 586-596.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.55
  50. Gore, J. M., & Gitlin, A. D. (2004). [RE]Visioning the academic-teacher divide: Power and knowledge in the educational community. Teachers and Teaching, 10(1), 35-58.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600320000170918
  51. Green, C. A., Tindall-Ford, S. K. & Eady, M. J. (2020). School-university partnerships in Australia: a systematic literature review. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 48(4), 403-435.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2019.1651822
  52. Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. Teachers College Press. 
  53. Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating Professional Development. Corwin. 
  54. Hagay, G., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2015). A strategy for incorporating students' interests into the high-school science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(7), 949-978.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21228
  55. Hall, R., & Nemirovsky, R. (2012). Introduction to the special issues: Modalities of body engagement in mathematical activity and learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(2), 207-215.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.611447
  56. Han, I., & Black, J. B. (2011). Incorporating haptic feedback in simulation for learning physics. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2281-2290.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.012
  57. Hargreaves, A. (2000). Four ages of professionalism and professional learning. Teachers and Teaching 6(2), 151-182.  https://doi.org/10.1080/713698714
  58. Hargreaves, D. H. (1999). Revitalising educational research: lessons from the past and proposals for the future. Cambridge Journal of Education, 29(2), 239-249.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764990290207
  59. Hascher, T., Cocard, Y., & Moser, P. (2004). Forget about theory-practice is all? Student teachers' learning in practicum. Teachers and Teaching, 10(6), 623-637. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354060042000304800. 
  60. Hirschkorn, M., & Geelan, D. (2008). Bridging the research-practice gap: Research translation and/or research transformation. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 54(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.11575/ajer.v54i1.55207 
  61. Howard, M. O., McMillen, C. J., & Pollio, D. E. (2003). Teaching evidence-based practice: Toward a new paradigm for social work education. Research on Social Work Practice,13(2), 234-259.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731502250404
  62. Hudson, S., Hudson, P., & Adie, L. (2015). The school-community integrated learning pathway: Exploring a new way to prepare and induct final-year preservice teachers. Improving Schools, 18(3), 221-235. doi: 10.1177/1365480215596223. 
  63. Johnston, S. (1994). Experience is the best teacher; or is it? An analysis of the role of experience in learning to teach. Journal of Teacher Education, 45(3), 199-208.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487194045003006
  64. Kang, N. H., Kang, H., Maeng, S., Park, J., & Jeong, E. (2020). Teacher competency in competency-focused science teaching in the South Korean context: Teacher self-assessment instrument development and application. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 6(2), 480-513.  https://doi.org/10.1163/23641177-BJA10012
  65. Kennedy, M. M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching?. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 945-980.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626800
  66. Kind, V. (2019). Development of evidence-based, student-learning-oriented rubrics for pre-service science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 41(7), 911-943.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1311049
  67. King, B. M., & Newmann, F. M. (2000). Will teacher learning advance school goals? Phi Delta Kappan, 81, 576-580. 
  68. Kloser, M. (2014). Identifying a core set of science teaching practices: A delphi expert panel approach. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(9), 1185-1217.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21171
  69. Korthagen, F. A. J. & Kessels, J. P. A. M. (1999) Linking theory and practice: changing the pedagogy of teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28(4), 4-17.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X028004004
  70. Korthagen, F. A. J. (2007). The gap between research and practice revisited. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(3), 303-310.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610701640235
  71. Korthagen, F. A. J. (2017). Inconvenient truths about teacher learning: Towards professional development 3.0. Teachers and Teaching, 23(4), 387-405. 
  72. Korthagen, F. A. J., & Vasalos, A. (2005). Levels in reflection: Core reflection as a means to enhance professional growth. Teachers and Teaching, 11(1), 47-71.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1354060042000337093
  73. Kwak, Y., Lee, K., & Jeong, E. (2021). Qualitative inquiry into the characteristics of science teacher learning communities: Cases within and across schools. Journal of Korean Association for Science Education, 41(4), 297-310. 
  74. Labaree, D. F. (2003). The peculiar problems of preparing educational researchers. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 13-22.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032004013
  75. Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
  76. Lee, H. S., & Park, J. (2013). Deductive reasoning to teach Newton's law of motion. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11, 1391-1414. 
  77. Lee, I., Park, J., & Yoon, H. G. (2022). Science teachers theory-based teaching: Connecting a learning cycle model to a lesson plan. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 21(3), 462-480.  https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/22.21.462
  78. Lee, K., Jeong, E., & Kwak, Y. (2022). Exploring the applicability of PLC protocol for enhancing science teachers' teaching expertise on inquiry class. Journal of Korean Association for Science Education, 42(4), 439-448. 
  79. Lemov, D. (2010). Teach like a champion. Jossey-Bass. 
  80. Lohmander, K. M. (2015). Bridging 'the gap' -linking workplace-based and university-based learning in preschool teacher education in Sweden. Early Years, 35(2), 168-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2015.1025712. 
  81. Lopez-Pastor, V. M., Monjas, R., & Manrique, J. C. (2011). Fifteen years of action research as professional development: Seeking more collaborative, useful and democratic systems for teachers. Educational Action Research 19(2), 153-170. 
  82. Lotter, C. R., & Miller, C. (2017). Improving inquiry teaching through reflection on practice. Research in Science Education, 47(4), 913-942. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9533-y 
  83. Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., & Stiles, K. E. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Corwin Press. 
  84. Loughran, J. J. (2002). Effective reflective practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 33-43.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102053001004
  85. Lumpe, A. T. (2007). Research-based professional development: Teachers engaged in professional learning communities. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 125-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10972-006-9018-3. 
  86. Lunenberg, M., Ponte, P., & Van De Ven, P. H. (2007). Why shouldn't teachers and teacher educators conduct research on their own practices? An epistemological exploration. European Educational Research Journal, 6(1), 13-24. http://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2007.6.1.13 
  87. Magnusson, S. J., Borko, H., & Krajcik, J. S. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95-132). Kluwer Press. 
  88. Marzano, R. (2007). The art and science of teaching. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. 
  89. Mason, K. O. (2013). Teacher involvement in pre-service teacher education. Teachers and Teaching, 19(5), 559-574. doi: 10.1080/13540602.2013.827366 
  90. McDonald, M., E. Kazemi, and S. S. Kavanagh. (2013). Core practices and pedagogies of teacher education: A call for a common language and collective activity. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5): 378-386. doi:10.1177/0022487113493807. 
  91. McLean Davies, L., Dickson, B., Rickards, F., Dinham, S., Conroy, J., & Davis, R. (2015). Teaching as a clinical profession: Translational practices in initial teacher education -An international perspective. Journal of Education for Teaching, 41(5), 514-528. doi: 10.1080/02607476.2015.1105537. 
  92. Meijer, P. C., Zanting, A., & Verloop, N. (2002). How can student teachers elicit experienced teachers' practical knowledge? Tools, suggestions, and significance. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(5), 406-419.  https://doi.org/10.1177/002248702237395
  93. Meirink, J. A., Imants, J., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2010). Teacher learning and collaboration in innovative teams. Cambridge Journal of Education 40(2), 161-181. 
  94. Meyer, M. (2010). The rise of the knowledge broker. Science Communication, 32(1), 118-127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547009359797 
  95. National Association for Professional Development Schools (NAPDS). (2008). What it means to be a professional development school. http://www.napds.org/nine_essen.html 
  96. Newman Jr, W. J., Abell, S. K., Hubbard, P. D., McDonald, J., Otaala, J., & Martini, M. (2004). Dilemmas of teaching inquiry in elementary science methods. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15(4), 257-279.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JSTE.0000048330.07586.d6
  97. Park, J., Kim, H., Yang, Y, Jeong, E., Joeng, J. (2023). A report on the growth support and model development project for innovative schools of the future (미래형 빛고을 혁신학교 성장지원 및 모델개발 사업 최종 보고서). Chonnam National University, Center for the Future Education, Gwangju, Korea. 
  98. Park, J., Kim, Y., Jeong, J. -S., & Park, Y. -S. (2016). Korean science teachers' perceptions and actual usage of educational theories/teaching strategies in their teaching. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(4), 411-423.  https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/16.15.411
  99. Park, J., Kim, Y., Park, Y. S., & Jeong, J. S. (2015). Development and application of the practical on-site cooperation model (pocom) for improving science teaching in secondary schools. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(1), 45-63. 
  100. Park, J., Park, Y. S., Kim, Y., & Jeong, J. S. (2014). The development of the Korean teaching observation protocol (KTOP) for improving science teaching and learning. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(2), 259-275.  https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/14.13.259
  101. Park, J., Yoon, H, -G., & Lee, I. (2021). Concepts of science teachers' content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge by considering the relationship between theory and practice. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 37(3), 187-209. 
  102. Park, J., Yoon, H. G., & Lee, I. (2023). Research-based teaching: Analyzing science teachers' process of understanding and using academic papers to teach scientific creativity. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 22(1), 57-72.  https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/23.22.57
  103. Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in science Education, 38, 261-284.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6
  104. Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. P. (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44(4), 921-958.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207308221
  105. Postholm, M. B. (2008). Teachers developing practice: Reflection as key activity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(7), 1717-1728. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.02.024 
  106. Ribaeus, K., Enochsson, A. -B., & Hultman, A. L. (2020). Student teachers' professional development: early practice and horizontal networks as ways to bridge the theory-practice gap. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2020.1797956. 
  107. Rockoff, J. E., Jacob, B. A., Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. O. (2011). Can you recognize an effective teacher when you recruit one? Education Finance and Policy, 6(1), 43-74.  https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00022
  108. Sebba, J. (2000). Education: Using research evidence to reshape practice. Public Money and Management, Oct/Dec 20(4), 8-10.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9302.00227
  109. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(1), 4-14.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
  110. Slavin, R. E. (2008). Perspectives on evidence-based research in education-What works? Issues in synthesizing educational program evaluations. Educational Researcher, 37(1), 5-14.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08314117
  111. Smith, E. A. (2001). The role of tacit and explicit knowledge in the workplace. Journal of knowledge Management, 5(4), 311-321.  https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270110411733
  112. Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., and Silver, E. A. (1999). The development of professional developers: Learning to assist teachers in new settings in new ways. Harvard Educational Review 69(3), 237-269.  https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.69.3.h2267130727v6878
  113. Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 221-258.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8
  114. Supovitz, J. A., & Turner, H. M. (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 963-980.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:9<963::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-0
  115. Tamir, P. (1988). Subject matter and related pedagogical knowledge in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 99-110.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(88)90011-X
  116. Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group [TEMAG] (2014). Action now: Classroom ready teachers. Department of Education and Training. 
  117. van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers' practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137-158.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200102)38:2<137::AID-TEA1001>3.0.CO;2-U
  118. van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & de Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 673-695.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199808)35:6<673::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-J
  119. Vangrieken, K., Meredith, C., Packer, T., & Kyndt, E. (2017). Teacher communities as a context for professional development: A systematic review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 47-59.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.001
  120. Wagner, R. K., & Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Practical intelligence in real-world pursuits: The role of tacit knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(2), 436-458.https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.2.436 
  121. Wallace, J., Wallace, J. W., & Louden, W. (2002). Dilemmas of science teaching: Perspectives on problems of practice. Psychology Press. 
  122. Watters, J. J., Hudson, S., & Hudson, P. (2013). Orienting preservice teachers towards gifted education: School-university partnerships. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 22(2), 32-44. 
  123. Wilson, S., Schweingruber, H., & Nielsen, N. (Eds.) (2016). Science teachers' learning: Enhancing opportunities, creating supportive contexts. The National Academies Press. 
  124. Yoon, H.-G. (2022). What do pre-service elementary teachers learn from inquiry into science class dilemmas?. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 41(2), 338-355. 
  125. Yost, D. S., Sentner, S. M., & Forlenza-Bailey, A. (2000). An examination of the construct of critical reflection: Implications for teacher education programming in the 21st century. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(1), 39-49.  https://doi.org/10.1177/002248710005100105
  126. Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college-and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 89-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109347671