Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education (한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육)

The Korean Elementary Science Education Society (한국초등과학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Phenomenological Study on Teachers' Experiences of Hybrid Mentoring in Self-directed Individual Inquiry Activities

자기주도적 개별 탐구 활동에서 하이브리드 멘토링(Hybrid Mentoring)을 실행한 교사들의 경험에 대한 현상학적 연구

  • Received : 2023.03.15
  • Accepted : 2023.05.03
  • Published : 2023.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the experiences of teachers who practiced hybrid mentoring in self-directed individual inquiry activities through phenomenological research. The participants were five teachers with more than 10 years of experience in guiding inquiry activities among students. The results indicated that the mentor teachers form rapport with students, establish a mentoring direction, specify the subject of inquiry, confirm and supplement prior scientific knowledge, specify the design of the inquiry, confirm and advise on the result of the inquiry, suggest additional tasks and inquiry activities, and check and advise on writing an inquiry report. They performed various roles such as trustee, guide, facilitator, helper, and mind trainer. During the mentoring process, the teachers encountered difficulties such as the lack of inquiry ability and knowledge of students, and the lack of understanding of parents about self-directed science inquiry activities. However, the teachers solved these problems through customized guidance for each student and by sharing the mentoring process. Finally, the teachers recognized that mentoring helped them improve their ability to guide self-directed scientific inquiry activities. Furthermore, they also experienced a sense of worth and achievement through the growth and positive responses of the students. The results are meaningful in that they provide specific information on the implementation method of hybrid mentoring and the role of mentor teachers in self-directed individual inquiry activities.

본 연구는 자기주도적 개별 탐구 활동에서 하이브리드 멘토링을 실행한 교사들의 경험을 현상학적 연구를 통해 알아보고자 하였다. 연구 참여자는 다년간 학생들의 탐구 활동을 지도한 10년 이상의 경력교사 5명이다. 연구 결과, 멘토 교사들은 학생들과의 래포 형성, 멘토링 방향 설정, 탐구 주제 구체화, 사전 과학 지식 확인 및 보충, 탐구 계획 구체화, 탐구 결과 확인 및 조언, 추가 과제 및 탐구 활동 제안, 탐구 보고서 작성 확인 및 조언을 실행하며 신뢰자, 안내자, 촉진자, 조력자, 마인드 트레이너와 같은 다양한 역할을 수행하였다. 교사들은 멘토링 과정에서 학생들의 탐구 능력 및 지식 부족, 자기주도적 과학 탐구 활동에 대한 학부모의 이해 부족 등의 어려움이 발생하였으나 학생별 맞춤 지도, 멘토링 과정 공유를 통해 이를 해결하였다. 교사들은 멘토링을 통해 자기주도적 개별 탐구 활동 지도 역량 신장에 도움이 된 것으로 인식하였으며, 학생의 성장과 긍정적 반응을 통해 보람과 성취감을 경험하였다. 본 연구 결과는 자기주도적 개별 탐구 활동에서 하이브리드 멘토링의 실행 방법과 멘토 교사의 역할에 대한 구체적인 정보를 제공해주고 있다는 점에서 의미가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Adler, I., Schwartz, L., Madjar, N., & Zion, M. (2018). Reading between the lines: The effect of contextual factors on student motivation throughout an open inquiry process. Science Education, 102(4), 820-855.
  2. Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2008). The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive, and teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12(3-4), 3-22.
  3. Bang, E. (2013). Hybrid-mentoring programs for beginning elementary science teachers. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(1), 1-15.
  4. Beak. Y. S., & Lim, J. I. (2021). A study on teacher's role for student agency. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 38(4), 281-304.
  5. Childre, A. L., & Van Rie, G. L. (2015). Mentor teacher training: A hybrid model to promote partnering in candidate development. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 34(1), 10-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/875687051503400104
  6. Choi, H. S., Kang, H. G., Seo, H. A., Park, I. Y., Lee, H. W., Lee, J. H., Park, G. H., & Park, J. H. (2003). A study on ways to enhance the creativity of science gifted students through research and education (R&E) programs. Korea Science Foundation Policy Research Report, 2002-5092.
  7. Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916-937. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:9<916::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-2
  8. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, 3rd Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  9. Ensher, E. A., Heun, C., & Blanchard, A. (2003) . Online mentoring and computer-mediated communication: New directions in research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(2), 264-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00044-7
  10. Field, P. A., & Morse, J. M. (1985). Nursing Research: the application of qualitative approaches. Croom Helm, London.
  11. Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
  12. Giorgi, A. (2012). The descriptive phenomenological psychological method. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 43(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1163/156916212X632934
  13. Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 29(2), 75-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02766777
  14. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1982). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 30(4), 233-252.
  15. Healy, C. C., & Welchert, A. J. (1990). Mentoring relations: A definition to advance research and practice. Educational Researcher, 19(9), 17-21. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X019009017
  16. Jung, C. M., & Shin, D. H. (2015). The learning experience of 7th graders on NOS (Nature of Science) as a process in research-based "Becoming a scientist" mentor-mentee program. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(4), 629-648.
  17. Kang, E. H. (2001). A study on the types and levels of inquiry in middle school students' free-topic science research (Doctoral dissertation). Seoul National University, Korea.
  18. Kim, E. H., & Kwon, H. S. (2016). Phenomenological study on the elementary students' experience participating in the science fair. Journal of Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 36(1), 113-123.
  19. Kim, G. D., & Shim, J. Y. (2008). Scientifically gifted students' perception of the impact of R&E program based on KAIST freshmen survey. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 28(4), 282-290.
  20. Kim, G. H., & Ha, M. S. (2019). Exploring the difficulties of high school students in self-directed scientific inquiry. Journal of Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 39(6), 707-715.
  21. Kim, J. Y., & Im, H. J. (2011). Analysis of the characteristics and issues of free inquiry performed by elementary school students. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 15(2), 535-554. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2011.15.2.535
  22. Kim, S. J., & Choi, B. S. (2005). Characteristics of experimental design and evidence choice of elementary school students in problem solving process related to controlling variable. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 25(2), 111-121.
  23. Kim, S. J., & Moon, G. S. (2006). Development of a web community-based inquiry learning system for elementary science education utilizing blended-learning strategy. The Korean Association of information Education, 10(2), 171-182.
  24. Kim, S. K., & Choi, W. H. (2019). Recognition of high school students and college student mentors on research project lessons using college student mentoring. School Science Journal, 13(1), 45-62.
  25. Kim, Y. C. (2013). Qualitative Research II Methods. Paju: Academy Press.
  26. Ko, Y., Kim, C., Lee, S., & Kang, D. (2014) . The secondary students' perception on science inquiry program and mentoring: In focus of the first Jeju science inquiry academy participants. Journal of Science Education, 38(1), 1-14.
  27. Lee, D. S., & Kim, Y. C. (2014) . An inquiry on the inclusive analytic procedures for qualitative data analysis: Based on the pragmatic eclecticism. The Journal of Educational Research, 12(1), 159-184.
  28. Lee, Y. S., & Kim, D. S. (2010). The effects of PBL-based free-inquiry method on science inquiry ability and self-directed learning characteristics. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 3(3), 239-247.
  29. Li, Q., Moorman, L., & Dyjur, P. (2010). Inquiry-based learning and e-mentoring via videoconference: A study of mathematics and science learning of Canadian rural students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(6), 729-753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9156-3
  30. Li, S., & Wang, W. (2022). Effect of blended learning on student performance in K 12 settings: A meta analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(5), 1254-1272. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12696
  31. Ministry of Education. (2015). 2015 revised Science National Curriculum. Ministry of Education.
  32. Neely, A. R., Cotton, J., & Neely, A. D. (2017). E-mentoring: A model and review of the literature. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 9(3), 220-242. https://doi.org/10.17705/1thci.00096
  33. Noe, R. A., Greenberger, D. B., & Wang, S. (2002). Mentoring: What we know and where we might go. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management 21, 129-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-7301(02)21003-8
  34. O'Byrne, W. I., & Pytash, K. E. (2015) . Hybrid and blended learning: Modifying pedagogy across path, pace, time, and place. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 59(2), 137-140. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.463
  35. Park, J. W. (1996). The effect of students' preconception and inquiry skills on the interpretation of electrical experiment results. Journal of Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 16(3), 227-238.
  36. Park, J. W. (2009). Discussions for preparation and types of mentorship for scientifically gifted students. Journal of Science Education for the Gifted, 1(3), 1-19.
  37. Park, M. R. (2013). Program development to facilitate self-directed open inquiry activity for gifted students in science and analysis of effect on the inquiry experiences (Doctoral dissertation). Ewha Womans University, Korea.
  38. Pekar, D., & Dolan, E. (2012). Helping students make meaning of authentic investigations: Findings from a student-teacher-scientist partnership. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7, 223-244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9385-3
  39. Schmid, S., & Bogner, F. X. (2017). How an inquiry-based classroom lesson intervenes in science efficacy, career-orientation and self-determination. International Journal of Science Education, 39(17), 2342-2360.
  40. Schuman, D. (1982). Policy analysis, education, and everyday life. Lexington, MA: Heath.
  41. Scogin, S. C., & Stuessy, C. L. (2015). Encouraging greater student inquiry engagement in science through motivational support by online scientist-mentors. Science Education, 99(2), 312-349. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21145
  42. Seidman, I. (1998). Interviewing as qualitative research. New York: Teachers College Press.
  43. Seo, B. E. (2021). Teachers' feedback in distance learning: Focusing on high school students' experiences. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 59(6), 63-86. https://doi.org/10.30916/KERA.59.6.63
  44. Shanahan, J. O., Ackley-Holbrook, E., Hall, E., Stewart, K., & Walkington, H. (2015). Ten salient practices of undergraduate research mentors: A review of the literature. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 23(5), 359-376. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2015.1126162
  45. Shim, K. C., & Kim, Y. S. (2005). Science gifted learning program: Research & education model. Journal of Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 25(6), 635-641.
  46. Shin, G. L. (2003). Theory: Theory and practice of phenomenological research. Nursing Research, 12(1), 49-68.
  47. Shin, H. H., & Kim, H. N. (2010). Analysis of elementary teachers' and students' views about difficulties on open science inquiry activities. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 29(3), 262-276.
  48. Shin, M. Y., & Choi, S. U. (2009). Characteristics of conclusions presented in self-directed science inquiry reports by eighth-grade students. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 30(6), 759-772.
  49. Singh, J., Steele, K., & Singh, L. (2021). Combining the best of online and face-to-face learning: Hybrid and blended learning approach for COVID-19, post vaccine, & post-pandemic world. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 50(2), 140-171.
  50. Symes, L. B., Serrell, N., & Ayres, M. P. (2015) . A practical guide for mentoring scientific inquiry. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 96(2), 352-367. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9623-96.2.352
  51. Wellington, J., & Ireson, G. (2008). Science learning, science teaching. London: Routledge.
  52. Wright, C. A., & Wright, S. D. (1987). The role of mentors in career development of young professionals. Family Relations, 36(2), 204-208. https://doi.org/10.2307/583955
  53. Yoo, M. H., & Ko, K. Y. (2010). The effect of online mentoring program for the science-gifted students' affective development. Journal of Science Education for the Gifted, 2(2), 39-60.
  54. Yoon, H. G., Joung, Y. J., & Kim, M. (2012). The challenges of science inquiry teaching for preservice teachers in elementary classrooms: Difficulties on and under the scene. Research in Science Education, 42(3), 589-608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9212-y
  55. Zion, M., Cohen, S., & Amir, R. (2007). The spectrum of dynamic inquiry teaching practices. Research in Science Education, 37(4), 423-447.