DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Nuclear power utilization as a future alternative energy on icebreakers

  • M. Bayraktar (Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University Maritime Faculty) ;
  • M. Pamik (Dokuz Eylul University, Maritime Faculty)
  • Received : 2022.07.07
  • Accepted : 2022.10.24
  • Published : 2023.02.25

Abstract

Diversified fuel types such as methanol, hydrogen, liquefied natural gas, ammonia, biofuels, have been come to fore in consideration of the limitations, regulations, environmental perception and efficient use of resources on maritime sector. NE is described as a substantial alternative energy source on the marine vessels in the sense of de-carbonization and fuel efficiency activities carried out by IMO. Although NPVs have been constructed for the merchant, navy and supply fields over the years, their numbers are few and working ranges are quite limited. NE generation techniques, reactor types, safety and security issues in case of any leakage or radiation pollution are analyzed and comparisons are performed between fossil-based fueled and NP based on icebreakers. The comparison are conducted on the basis of dimensions, resistances and operational competences by the VIKOR. NP icebreakers operated in recent years occupy a notable position in the ranking, although fossil fueled ones are most prevalent. Consequently, refueling period and emissions are the principal benefits of NPVs. Nevertheless, the use of such systems on marine vessels especially for merchant ships may come to the fore when all concerns in terms of safety, security and society are resolved since the slightest mistake can have irreversible consequences.

Keywords

References

  1. World Nuclear Association, Fast neutron reactors; nuclear-powered ships; world nuclear performance report, 2021, [Online], https://world-nuclear.org/, 2021.
  2. S. Singla, Nuclear ship propulsion: is it the future of the shipping industry, 2019 [Online], https://www.marineinsight.com/tech/nuclear-shippropulsion-is-it-the-future-of-the-shipping-industry/, 2019.
  3. S.E. Hirdaris, Y.F. Cheng, P. Shallcross, J. Bonafoux, D. Carlson, B. Prince, G.A. Sarris, Considerations on the potential use of Nuclear Small Modular Reactor (SMR) technology for merchant marine propulsion, Ocean Eng. 79 (2014) 101-130, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.10.015.
  4. M. Ragheb, Nuclear naval propulsion, in: Nuclear Power-Deployment, Operation and Sustainability, IntechOpen, London, 2011.
  5. ABB, ABB technology driving the world's largest icebreaking azipod propulsion fleet [Online]. Available: https://library.e.abb.com/public/fcdb42e90e174b2582cf51c14b201991/ABB%20technology%20driving%20the%20worlds%20largest%20icebreaking%20Azipod%20fleet.pdf, 2019.
  6. IMO, International, Code for the Safe Carriage of Packaged Irradiated Nuclear Fuel, Plutonium and High-Level Radioactive Wastes on Board Ships (INF Code), 1965 [Online]. Available: https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Safety/Pages/INF-Code.aspx.
  7. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Learning about Biogas Recovery, 2021 [Online], https://www.epa.gov/agstar/learning-about-biogasrecovery.
  8. N. Szewczuk-Krypa, A. Grzymkowska, J. Gluch, Comparative analysis of thermodynamic cycles of selected nuclear ship power plants with hightemperature helium-cooled nuclear reactor, Pol. Marit. Res. 25 (S1) (2018) 218-224, https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2018-0045 (97).
  9. L.O. Freire, D.A. de Andrade, Economically feasible mobile nuclear power plant for merchant ships and remote clients, Nucl. Technol. 205 (6) (2019) 766-780, https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2018.1546067.
  10. W.H. Donnelly, Nuclear Reactors, 1965 [Online]. Available: https://www.osti.gov/includes/opennet/includes/Understanding%20the%20Atom/SNAP%20Nuclear%20Space%20Reactors.pdf.
  11. A.Y. Gagarinskiy, Russian nuclear energy technologies for the development of the Arctic, Atw. Internationale Zeitschrift fuer Kernenergie 63 (3) (2018) 149-152.
  12. J.S. Carlton, R. Smart, V. Jenkins, The nuclear propulsion of merchant ships: aspects of engineering, science and technology, J. Mar. Eng. Technol. 10 (2) (2011) 47-59, https://doi.org/10.1080/20464177.2011.11020247.
  13. M.B. Zaman, H. Prasutiyon, H. Prastowo, Technical review of nuclear technology as the advanced ships propulsion, Asian J. Nat. Appl. Sci. 4 (3) (2016), 2016.
  14. B. Zohuri, P.J. McDaniel, Introduction to Energy Essentials: Insight into Nuclear, Renewable, and Non-renewable Energies, Elsevier, 2021.
  15. M. Asad, Z. Riaz, A. Mansoor, M. Hussain, An empirical and numerical approach to develop A single and multi-phase CFD methodology for submarines and ship, in: International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences and Technologies, IEEE, 2021, pp. 856-863.
  16. R. O'Rourke, Navy Nuclear-Powered Surface Ships: Background, Issues, and Options for Congress, DIANE Publishing, 2010.
  17. C. Skinner, Nuclear propulsion roadmap for Australia (r)ea systems engineering approach, Aust. J. Multi-Disciplinary Eng. 17 (1) (2021) 39-44, https://doi.org/10.1080/14488388.2021.1876585.
  18. M. Hoque, A.Z.M. Salauddin, M.R.H. Khondoker, Design and comparative analysis of small modular reactors for nuclear marine propulsion of a ship, World J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 8 (3) (2018) 136-145, https://doi.org/10.4236/wjnst.2018.83012.
  19. J. Vergara, C.B. McKesson, Nuclear propulsion in high-performance cargo vessels-Response, Mar. Technol. Sname News. 39 (3) (2002) A5.
  20. L.O. Freire, D.A. de Andrade, Historic survey on nuclear merchant ships, Nucl. Eng. Des. 293 (2015) 176e186, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2015.07.031.
  21. N. Todreas, Small modular reactors (SMRs) for producing nuclear energy: an introduction, in: Handbook of Small Modular Nuclear Reactors, Woodhead Publishing, London, 2021, pp. 3-27.
  22. A.W. Kramer, Nuclear Propulsion for Merchant Ships, US Atomic Energy Commission, 1962.
  23. World Nuclear Association, Nuclear fission and types of nuclear reactor [Online], http://www.world-nuclear.org/getmedia/80f869be-32c8-46e7-802deb4452939ec5/Pocket-GuideReactors.pdf.aspx#:~:text=The%20LWGR%20(light%20water%20grahite,referred%20to%20as%20the%20RBMK.&text=In%20FBR%20(f st%20breeder%20reactor,uranium%3B%20no%20moderator%20is%2used, 2017.
  24. Nuclearstreet, Pressurized heavy water reactor (PHWR) [Online]. Available: https://nuclearstreet.com/nuclear-power-plants/w/nuclear_power_plants/320.pressurized-heavy-water-reactor-phwr, 2021.
  25. D.T. Ingersoll, Small Modular Reactors: Nuclear Power Fad or Future? Woodhead Publishing, 2015.
  26. H. Schoyen, K. Steger-Jensen, Nuclear propulsion in ocean merchant shipping: the role of historical experiments to gain insight into possible future applications, J. Clean. Prod. 169 (2017) 152e160, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.163.
  27. P. Balcombe, J. Brierley, C. Lewis, L. Skatvedt, J. Speirs, A. Hawkes, I. Staffell, How to decarbonise international shipping: options for fuels, technologies and policies, Energy Convers. Manag. 182 (2019) 72e88, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.12.080.
  28. Z. Mian, M.V. Ramana, A.H. Nayyar, Nuclear submarines in south asia: new risks and dangers, J. Peace. Nucl. Disarm. 2 (1) (2019) 184e202, https://doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2019.1621425.
  29. O. Soner, E. Celik, E. Akyuz, Application of AHP and VIKOR methods under interval type 2 fuzzy environment in maritime transportation, Ocean Eng. 129 (2017) 107e116, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.11.010.
  30. A. Balin, H. Demirel, F. Celik, F. Alarcin, A fuzzy dematel model proposal for the cause and effect of the fault occurring in the auxiliary systems of the ships' main engine, Int. J. Eng. Marit. 160 (A2) (2018), https://doi.org/10.5750/ijme.v160iA2.1053.
  31. A. Balin, B. Sener, H. Demirel, An integrated fuzzy mcdm model for evaluation and selection of a suitable tugboat, Int. J. Eng. Marit. 161 (A3) (2019), https://doi.org/10.5750/ijme.v161iA3.1097.
  32. H. Demirel, M. Mollaoglu, U. Bucak, T. Arslan, T.A. Balin, The application of fuzzy ahpevikor hybrid method to investigate the strategy for reducing air pollution from diesel powered vessels, Int. J. Eng. Marit. 162 (A3) (2020), https://doi.org/10.5750/ijme.v162iA3.1138.
  33. B. Shah, H. Lakhani, K. Abhishek, S. Kumari, Application of fuzzy linguistic modelling aggregated with VIKOR for optimal selection of solar power plant site: an empirical study, in: Renewable Energy and Climate Change, 2020. Singapore.
  34. M. Dalgic, Analysis of a Closed Cycle Gas Turbine Nuclear Power Plant for Submarine propulsion,Doctoral Dissertation, Energy Institute, Istanbul, 2001.
  35. J.G.C.C. Jacobs, Nuclear Short Sea Shipping, Master Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands, 2007.
  36. The Maritime Executive, Russia launches nuclear ice-breaker ural [Online], https://www.maritime-executive.com/article/russia-launches-nuclear-icebreaker-ural, 2019.
  37. World Nuclear News, Russia prepares for next icebreaker series [Online], https://world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/Russia-prepares-for-nexticebreaker-series#:~:text=The%20main%20characteristics%20of%20Project,displacement%20of%20about%2069%2C700%20tonnes, 2020.
  38. J.S.C. Atomenergomash, Solutions for the shipbuilding industry [Online]. Available: https://aem-group.ru/static/images/buklety/2020/Booklet_sudostroenie_en.pdf, 2020.
  39. Offshore Energy, Arctic offshore supply vessel Aleksey Chirikov named in Finland [Online]. Available: https://www.offshore-energy.biz/arctechhelsinki-names-offshore-supply-vessel-aleksey-chirikov/, 2013.
  40. Icebreakers Arctect, Arctic offshore and specialist vessels [Online]. Available: https://www.ship-technology.com/contractors/building/arctech-helsinkishipyard, 2021.
  41. Royal Wagenborg, Arcticaborg [Online]. Available: https://www.wagenborg.com/media/1113/2019-antarcticaborg.pdf, 2019.
  42. Swedish Maritime Administration, Icebreaker oden [Online], https://www.sjofartsverket.se/globalassets/isbrytning/isbrytarbilder/oden-for-webben.pdf, 2021.
  43. Australian Antarctic Program, Australia's new Antarctic icebreaker RSV Nuyina [Online]. Available: https://documents.ats.aq/ATCM42/att/ATCM42_att096_e.pdf, 2021.
  44. T.S. Shipping, MPSV Botnica [Online], https://www.ts-shipping.com/?lang=en, 2021.
  45. Safety Comes First (SCF) Group. Gennadiy Nevelskoy, Stepan Makarov, Fedor ushakov, yevgeny primakov, Vitus bering, Aleksey Chirikov and SCF Sakhalin [Online], http://www.scf-group.com/en/fleet/fleetlist/, 2021.
  46. H. Metsal, Port of Tallinn-converting ambitions into action [Online]. Available: http://h2est.ee/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/7_Port_of_Tallinn_Hydrogen_Week_Hele-Mai-Metsal.pdf, 2021.
  47. A. Alinezhad, J. Khalili, New Methods and Applications in Multiple Attribute Decision Making (MADM), Springer, 2019.
  48. M. Yazdani, F.R. Graeml, VIKOR and its applications: a state-of-the-art survey, Int. J. Strat. Decis. Sci. 5 (2) (2014) 56-83, https://doi.org/10.4018/ijsds.2014040105.