DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Librarians' Perception of Teaching and Learning Support Services of Academic Libraries

대학도서관 교수·학습지원 서비스에 대한 사서 인식분석

  • 최예진 (연세대학교 대학도서관발전연구소) ;
  • 나민경 (연세대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 이지연 (연세대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2023.04.21
  • Accepted : 2023.05.17
  • Published : 2023.05.31

Abstract

This study analyzed the respective teaching and learning-related services offered by the Centers for Teaching and Learning and the academic libraries to find the proper roles of libraries regarding this type of service. We interviewed librarians to collect the data. The content analysis of the qualitative interview data enabled us to identify the librarians' perceptions of teaching and learning support, service provision method, strengthening relationships with other academic units, recognition of libraries' roles within the universities, and generating more investment for the libraries. Finally, the analysis led to six suggestions for libraries' teaching and learning support functions, such as advertising the availability of specific academic discipline or unit-oriented library services, strengthening librarian's capabilities as educators, bolstering digital information literacy of the faculty members and students, injecting libraries' views into the development and maintaining fundamental knowledge-related programs, emphasizing the notion of human-centered libraries, and finding new ways to utilize library space.

본 연구는 대학구성원의 교수·학습 활동을 위해 대학도서관에서 지원해야 하는 서비스의 방향성을 모색하기 위하여 교수학습센터와 대학도서관에서 제공하고 있는 교수·학습 관련 활동 현황을 파악하고, 대학도서관 사서를 대상으로 인터뷰를 통해 교수·학습 지원활동에 대한 인식을 분석하였다. 질적 데이터의 내용분석 결과, 도서관 서비스 영역에서는 교수·학습지원, 서비스 제공방식, 관계 강화와 관련된 실무자들의 인식을 파악할 수 있었으며, 도서관 역할 인식 영역에서는 도서관 역할에 대한 타 부서 인식, 도서관 역할 정립, 도서관 투자 확대로 나누어 이에 대한 실무자들의 인식을 파악할 수 있었다. 이에 본 연구에서는 대학도서관의 교수·학습지원 서비스의 방향성으로 '전공 및 학과 전담 서비스에 대한 홍보 강화', '교육자로서 사서의 역량 강화', '디지털 정보자원에 대한 리터러시 강화', '기초소양 함양 프로그램의 개발 및 운영에 있어 도서관의 역할 강화', '휴먼라이브러리의 운영', '도서관 공간의 다양한 활용 모색' 등을 제시하였다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2022년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임 (NRF-2022S1A5C2A0309359721)

References

  1. Chang, Yun-Keum (2005). A study of university libraries' faculty research support system. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 22(4), 197-220. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2005.22.4.197
  2. Choi, Sang-Hee (2010). Analysis on online research guides of university libraries. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 27(1), 229-248. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.1.229
  3. Jeon, Young-Mee (2006). An investigation on the role of center for teaching and learning for university teaching excellence: on the comparison of the homepages of centers for teaching and learning in Korea and United States universities. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24(4), 153-180.
  4. Kim, Jung-Sub (2012). Learning consultation at a center for teaching and learning. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 26(4), 837-851.
  5. Kim, Kyung-yee, Min, Hye-ree, Nam, Min-Woo, Woo, Jeong-Won, & Kim, Joo-An (2018). A study on the current status and needs assessment of the center for teaching and learning in the university. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 56(3), 227-257. http://dx.doi.org/10.30916/KERA.56.3.227
  6. Kim, So-Young & Cha, Mikyeong (2007). A study on the service management of libraries for academic courses in e-learning environment. Journal of Information Management, 38(3), 137-160. https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2007.38.3.137
  7. Ko, Jang-Wan, Park, Su-mee, & Park, Ji Hoe (2017). An analysis of changes in the function for teaching and learning center in the universities and exploring the direction of development. Korean Association Center of Teaching and Learning, The 9th Collection of Research Project Contest Papers, 55-78.
  8. Korean Association Center of Teaching and Learning. Available: https://www.kactl.org
  9. Lee, Eung-Bong (2010). The modeling of scholarly information services in order to support lecture and research activities for faculties-based Web 2.0 in Korea university libraries. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 44(1), 157-180. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2010.44.1.157
  10. Lee, Jeong-Mee & Park, Young-Woo (2017). Development of Library Teaching and Learning Model for the Promotion of Humanities in Universities (RM 2017-18). Korea Education and Research Information Service.
  11. Lee, Yong-Jae & Lee, Ji-Wook (2019). A study on the roles of academic library for supporting class and learning activities in Korea. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 50(4), 359-379. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.50.4.201912.359
  12. Lee, Yong-Jae & Lee, Ji-Wook (2020). A study on the present stage of research support services of academic library in Korea. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 51(1), 305-327. http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.51.202003.305 
  13. Min, Hye-ree (2002). Rethinking for the quality of teaching and learning process in higher education: review on teaching and learning center' in American university. Korean Journal of Comparative Education, 12(1), 75-92.
  14. Min, Hye-Ree, Yu, Byeong-Min, & Shim, Mi-Ja (2005). A study on the factors of best lecture for improving the educational quality of university teaching. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 11(3), 41-65.
  15. Ministry of Education (2019). The 2nd Academic Library Development Plan(2019~2023). Sejong: Ministry of Education.
  16. Nam, Young Joon & Kim, Hee-Sun (2012). A study on the research support service of college libraries. Journal of Information Management, 43(3), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2012.43.3.001
  17. Oh, Sun-Hye & Kwak, Seung-Jin (2020). A study on the research support services of the university library based on the research life cycle. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 54(2), 155-178. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2020.54.2.155
  18. Park, Eun-sook & Choi, Yun-Hee (2016). A study on the development of CTL writing program in university. The Journal of Humanities and Social science, 7(2), 69-90. http://doi.org/10.22143/HSS21.7.2.4
  19. Park, Eun-sook (2019). A study on developing outcome evaluation model for CTL teaching competency enforcing program in university. The Journal of Humanities and Social science, 10(2), 647-658. https://doi.org/10.22143/HSS21.10.2.46
  20. Park, Eun-sook, Rhee Eun-sil, & Yoo, Jung-Ah (2012). A study on the analysis of factors that effect on the long run and short run CTL programs in the universities and the managing strategies for successful CTL programs. Journal of Lifelong Learning Society, 8(3), 153-174. https://doi.org/10.26857/JLLS.2012.12.8.3.153
  21. Regulations for the Establishment and Operation of Universities. [Enforcement from 2022.1.21.] [Amended by the Presidential Decree No. 32352, 2022.1.21., Revision of other laws]
  22. Rinfo. Available: https://www.rinfo.kr
  23. So, Yeon-hee (2015). Development and validation of perception of learner centered instruction scale. Asian Journal of Education, 16(1), 113-135. http://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2015.16.1.006
  24. Song, Hae-Deok, Hong, Ju-yeon, & Lee, Ji-hyun (2014). Development of a job model for research fellows at college centers for teaching and learning. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 52(1), 191-220.
  25. Um, Young-Ai & Lee, Du-Yi (2006). A study on the services for research of academic libraries. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 37(4), 161-180. 
  26. Brancato, V. C. (2003). Professional development in higher education. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2003(98), 59-66. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.100
  27. College of Mount Saint Vincent. The Right Place for Student Success. Available: https://mountsaintvincent.edu/the-right-place-for-student-success/
  28. Cross, K. P. (2001). Leading-edge efforts to improve teaching and learning the hesburge awards. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 33(4), 30-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091380109601807
  29. Detmering, R. & Payette, P. (2021). Finding a new fit for student success: librarians as agents of teaching innovation and institutional change. Journal of Library Administration, 61(8), 947-963. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2021.1984138
  30. Herman, J. H. (2013). Staffing of teaching and learning centers in United State: indicators of institutional support for faculty development. The Journal of Faculty Development, 27(2), 33-37.
  31. Johnson-Farmer, B. J. & Frenn, M. (2009). Teaching excellence: what great teachers teach us. Journal of Professional Nursing, 25(5), 267-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2009.01.020
  32. Kiryakova, G., Yordanova, L., & Angelova, N. (2017). Can we make schools and universities smarter with the Internet of Things?. TEM Journal, 6(1), 80-84. https://dx.doi.org/10.18421/TEM61-11
  33. Lieberman, D. (2005). Beyond faculty development: how centers for teaching and learning can be laboratories for learning. New Directions for Higher Education, 2005(131), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.189
  34. Ouellett, M. L. (2004). Faculty development and universal instructional design. Equity & Excellence in Education, 37(2), 135-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680490453977
  35. Singer, S. R. (2002). Learning and teaching centers: hubs of educational reform. New directions for higher education, 119, 59-64. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.71
  36. Syracuse University Library. Human Library. Available: https://researchguides.library.syr.edu/c.php?g=258461&p=1725044
  37. Texas A&M Universty Library. Human Library. Available: https://library.tamu.edu/human-library/index.php