DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Hip Extensor Muscles Activities According to Forward Trunk Lean Angles During Single-leg Deadlift

  • Saerin Lee (Department of Physical Therapy, The Graduate School, Inje University) ;
  • Duk-hyun An (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Healthcare Medical Science and Engineering, Inje University)
  • Received : 2023.01.30
  • Accepted : 2023.02.10
  • Published : 2023.02.20

Abstract

Background: Excessive hamstring (HS) activation due to the weakness of the gluteus maximus (GM) causes pain in the hip joint. A single-leg deadlift is a hip extensor exercise, especially GM, that includes functional movements in daily life and complex multi-joint training. In single-leg deadlift, the muscle activity depends on the forward trunk lean angle, and it's necessary to study which muscles are used dominantly depending on the angle. Objects: The purpose of this study was to compare the effect on the muscle activity of the GM and HS during single-leg deadlift according to different forward trunk lean angles and the ratio of the GM vs HS (GM/HS). Methods: Twenty-one healthy female participants were recruited. The muscles activities of the GM, HS and the GM/HS ratio were measured through electromyography during single-leg deadlift according to three condition of forward trunk lean angles (30°, 60°, and 90°). Results: The GM and HS activities significantly differed among three conditions (p < 0.05). GM/HS ratio was significantly higher at 30° and 60° of forward trunk lean compared to 90°. Moreover, the GM activity was significantly higher at 60° of forward trunk lean than at 30° (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The single-leg deadlift at 60° of forward trunk lean is a proper GM muscle strengthening exercise.

Keywords

References

  1. Neumann D. Kinesiology of the musculoskeletal system. 3rd ed. St. Louis (MO): Elsevier; 2016;414-6, 523-60.
  2. Standring S. Gray's anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2016.
  3. Muscolino JE. Know the body: muscle, bone, and palpation essentials. St. Louis (MO): Elsevier; 2011;378-80.
  4. Elzanie A, Borger J. Anatomy, bony pelvis and lower limb, gluteus maximus muscle. In: Abai B, Abu-Ghosh A, Acharya AB, Acharya U, Adhia SG, Sedeh P, et al. editors. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022.
  5. McCurdy K, Walker J, Yuen D. Gluteus maximus and hamstring activation during selected weight-bearing resistance exercises. J Strength Cond Res 2018;32(3):594-601. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001893
  6. Neto WK, Soares EG, Vieira TL, Aguiar R, Chola TA, Sampaio VL, et al. Gluteus maximus activation during common strength and hypertrophy exercises: a systematic review. J Sports Sci Med 2020;19(1):195-203.
  7. Sahrmann S, Azevedo DC, Dillen LV. Diagnosis and treatment of movement system impairment syndromes. Braz J Phys Ther 2017;21(6):391-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.08.001
  8. Distefano LJ, Blackburn JT, Marshall SW, Padua DA. Gluteal muscle activation during common therapeutic exercises. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2009;39(7):532-40. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2009.2796
  9. Howe L, Goodwin J, Blagrove R. The integration of unilateral strength training for the lower extremity within an athletic performance programme. Prof Strength Cond 2014;33:19-24.
  10. Weaver AN, Kerksick CM. Implementing landmine singleleg Romanian deadlift into an athlete's training program. Strength Cond J 2017;39(1):85-90. https://doi.org/10.1519/SSC.0000000000000279
  11. Moon SJ, Kim JW, Park MC. Electromyographic analysis of hamstrings and quadriceps coactivation during single-limbdeadlift exercises according to the angle of the knee joint. PNF Mov 2021;19(1):79-86.
  12. Hwang YI, Moon SJ, Park DJ. Electromyographic analysis of quadriceps and hamstrings co-activation during hamstring strengthening exercises. PNF Mov 2019;17(3):441-50.
  13. Mathiyakom W, McNitt-Gray JL, Requejo P, Costa K. Modifying center of mass trajectory during sit-to-stand tasks redistributes the mechanical demand across the lower extremity joints. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2005;20(1):105-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.08.005
  14. Jeong S, Son S, Lee H, Lee J, Baek J, Yang S. Comparison of trunk and lower extremity muscle activities during deadlift depending on support surface. PNF Mov 2022;20(1):67-72.
  15. Criswell E. Cram's introduction to surface electromyography. 2nd ed. Boston: Jones & Bartlett; 2010.
  16. Hislop H, Avers D, Brown M. Daniels and Worthingham's muscle testing: techniques of manual examination and performance testing. 9th ed. St. Louis (MO): Elsevier; 2013.
  17. Norkin CC, White DJ. Measurement of joint motion: a guide to goniometry. 5th ed. Philadelphia (PA): F. A. Davis; 2016.
  18. Levangie PK, Norkin CC, Lewek MD. Joint structure & function: a comprehensive analysis. 6th ed. Philadelphia (PA): F. A. Davis; 2019.
  19. Rippetoe M. Starting strength: basic barbell training. 3rd ed. Wichita Falls (TX): Aasgaard Company; 2011.
  20. Stastny P, Lehnert M, Zaatar AM, Svoboda Z, Xaverova Z. Does the dumbbell-carrying position change the muscle activity in split squats and walking lunges? J Strength Cond Res 2015; 29(11):3177-87. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000000976
  21. Atkins LT, Reid J, Zink D. The effects of increased forward trunk lean during stair ascent on hip adduction and internal rotation in asymptomatic females. Gait Posture 2022;97:147-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.08.001
  22. Kim N, Choi B. The influence of hamstring length on the flexion-relaxation phenomenon in relation to the erector spinae muscle during trunk flexion. Phys Ther Korea 2020; 27(3):171-7. https://doi.org/10.12674/ptk.2020.27.3.171
  23. Higashihara A, Nagano Y, Takahashi K, Fukubayashi T. Effects of forward trunk lean on hamstring muscle kinematics during sprinting. J Sports Sci 2015;33(13):1366-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2014.990483
  24. Alghamdi W, Preece SJ. How does normal variability in trunk flexion affect lower limb muscle activity during walking? Hum Mov Sci 2020;72:102630.