Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry (대한소아치과학회지)

Korean Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (대한소아치과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength and Microleakage of Self-adhesive Giomer

  • Gwangsuk Kim (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Juhyun Lee (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Haeni Kim (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Howon Park (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
  • Received : 2023.07.28
  • Accepted : 2023.09.06
  • Published : 2023.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was aimed to evaluate the bonding performance of a self-adhesive giomer and compare it to a conventional flowable composite resin with regard to shear bond strength and microleakage in enamel and dentin. Healthy human premolars extracted for orthodontic treatments were used in the study. For shear bond strength tests, enamel and dentin specimens were prepared for the study group with self-adhesive giomer and for the control group with conventional flowable composite resin with a 5th-generation adhesive system. A universal testing machine was used to measure the shear bond strength. For the microleakage tests, specimens were immersed in a 2% methylene blue solution for 24 hours, cut into sections, and evaluated with a stereomicroscope for the extent of dye penetration. The results of the study showed no statistically significant difference in shear bond strength between the self-adhesive giomer and the conventional flowable composite resin in enamel (p = 0.091). On the contrary, in dentin, the self-adhesive giomer showed significantly lower shear bond strength (p < 0.0001). The microleakage of the self-adhesive giomer was significantly higher than that of the conventional flowable composite resin (p = 0.002). Self-adhesive giomer is considered useful for restoring small cavities at the enamel level of pediatric patients by reducing chair time with the advantage of a simple bonding process. However, as the study was conducted in a laboratory setting, further research in a clinical environment is deemed necessary.

Keywords

References

  1. Buonocore MG : A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res, 34:849-853, 1955. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345550340060801
  2. Ahmad I : Evaluating dentin bonding agents: an update. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent, 15:529-536, 2003.
  3. Magne P, Mahallati R, Bazos P, So WS : Direct dentin bonding technique sensitivity when using air/suction drying steps. J Esthet Restor Dent, 20:130-138, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2008.00164.x
  4. Spreafico D, Semeraro S, Mezzanzanica D, Re D, Gagliani M, Tanaka T, Sano H, Sidhu SK : The effect of the air-blowing step on the technique sensitivity of four different adhesive systems. J Dent, 34:237-244, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2005.06.004
  5. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G : Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent, 28:215-235, 2003.
  6. Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, Hashimoto M, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Suzuki K : Technique-sensitivity of contemporary adhesives. Dent Mater, 24:1-13, 2005. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.24.1
  7. Eidelman E, Faibis S, Peretz B : A comparison of restorations for children with early childhood caries treated under general anesthesia or conscious sedation. Pediatr Dent, 22:33-37, 2000.
  8. Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, Momoi Y, Van Landuyt KL, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J : TEM interfacial characterization of an experimental self-adhesive filling material bonded to enamel/dentin. Dent Mater, 27:818-824, 2011.
  9. Ikemura K, Tay FR, Nishyama N, Pashley DH, Endo T : Design of new phosphonic acid monomers for dental adhesives-synthesis of (meth)acryloxyalkyl 3-phosphonopropionates and evaluation of their adhesion-promoting functions. Dent Mater, 26:566-575, 2006.
  10. Poitevin A, De Munck J, Van Ende A, Suyama Y, Mine A, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B : Bonding effectiveness of self-adhesive composites to dentin and enamel. Dent Mater, 29:221-230, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.10.001
  11. Bumrungruan C, Sakoolnamarka R : Microshear bond strength to dentin of self-adhesive flowable composite compared with total-etch and all-in-one adhesives. J Dent Sci, 11:449-456, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2016.08.003
  12. Yuan H, Li M, Guo B, Gao Y, Liu H, Li J : Evaluation of microtensile bond strength and microleakage of a self-adhering flowable composite. J Adhes Dent, 17:535-543, 2015.
  13. Brueckner C, Schneider H, Haak R : Shear bond strength and tooth-composite interaction with self-adhering flowable composites. Oper Dent, 42:90-100, 2017. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-365-L
  14. Peterson J, Rizk M, Hoch M, Wiegand A : Bonding performance of self-adhesive flowable composites to enamel, dentin and a nano-hybrid composite. Odontology, 106:171-180, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-017-0324-3
  15. Fujimoto Y, Iwasa M, Murayama R, Miyazaki M, Nagafuji A, Nakatsuka T : Detection of ions released from S-PRG fillers and their modulation effect. Dent Mater, 29:392-397, 2010.
  16. Saku S, Kotake H, Scougall-Vilchis RJ, Ohashi S, Hotta M, Horiuchi S, Hamada K, Asaoka K, Tanaka E, Yamamoto K : Antibacterial activity of composite resin with glass-ionomer filler particles. Dent Mater J, 29:193-198, 2010. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2009-050
  17. Nomura R, Morita Y, Matayoshi S, Nakano K : Inhibitory effect of surface pre-reacted glass-ionomer (S-PRG) eluate against adhesion and colonization by Streptococcus mutans. Sci Rep, 8:5056, 2018.
  18. Crim GA, Garcia-Godoy F : Microleakage: the effect of storage and cycling duration. J Prosthet Dent, 57:574-576, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90339-8
  19. Moncada G, Fernandez E, Martin J, Arancibia C, Mjor IA, Gordan VV : Increasing the longevity of restorations by minimal intervention: a two-year clinical trial. Oper Dent, 33:258-264, 2008. https://doi.org/10.2341/07-113
  20. Jang EY, Lee JS, Nam SH, Kwon TY, Kim HJ : Comparison of Microleakage and Compressive Strength of Different Base Materials. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 48:168-175, 2021. https://doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2021.48.2.168
  21. Marquezan M, da Silveira BL, Burnett LH Jr, Rodrigues CR, Kramer PF : Microtensile bond strength of contemporary adhesives to primary enamel and dentin. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 32:127-132, 2008.
  22. Bacelar-Sa R, Sauro S, Abuna G, Vitti R, Nikaido T, Tagami J, Ambrosano GMB, Giannini M : Adhesion Evaluation of Dentin Sealing, Micropermeability, and Bond Strength of Current HEMA-free Adhesives to Dentin. J Adhes Dent, 19:357-364, 2017.
  23. Kim MJ, Kim JH, Song JS, Chung SH, Hyun HK : Shear Bond Strength of Different MDP-Containing Adhesive Systems on Enamel and Dentin from Primary Teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 45:186-192, 2021. https://doi.org/10.17796/1053-4625-45.3.7
  24. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Van Ende A, Neves A, De Munck J : Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater, 26:E100-E121, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.148
  25. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Breschi L, Tjaderhane L, Carvalho RM, Carrilho M, Tezvergil-Mutluay A : State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater, 27:1-16, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.016
  26. Hafer M, Schneider H, Rupf S, Busch I, Fuchss A, Merte I, Jentsch H, Haak R, Merte K : Experimental and clinical evaluation of a self-etching and an etch-and-rinse adhesive system. J Adhes Dent, 15:275-286, 2013.
  27. Leloup G, D'Hoore W, Bouter D, Degrange M, Vreven J : Meta-analytical review of factors involved in dentin adherence. J Dent Res, 80:1605-1614, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345010800070301
  28. De Munck J, Mine A, Poitevin A, Van Ende A, Cardoso MV, Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B : Meta-analytical review of parameters involved in dentin bonding. J Dent Res, 91:351-357, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034511431251
  29. David C, Cardoso de Cardoso G, Isolan CP, Piva E, Moraes RR, Cuevas-Suarez CE : Bond strength of self-adhesive flowable composite resins to dental tissues: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. J Prosthet Dent, 128:876-885, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.02.020
  30. Beniash E, Stifler CA, Sun CY, Jung GS, Qin Z, Buehler MJ, Gilbert PUPA : The hidden structure of human enamel. Nat Commun, 10:4383, 2019.
  31. Yamakoshi Y : Dentinogenesis and Dentin Sialo-phosphoprotein (DSPP). J Oral Biosci, 51:134, 2009.
  32. Amaral CM, Hara AT, Pimenta LA, Rodrigues AL Jr : Microleakage of hydrophilic adhesive systems in class V composite restorations. Am J Dent, 14:31-33, 2001.
  33. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer A : The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res, 63:1396-1399, 1984. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345840630121101
  34. Munksgaard EC, Irie M, Asmussen E : Dentin-polymer bond promoted by gluma and various resins. J Dent Res, 64:1409-1411, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345850640121801
  35. Wei YJ, Silikas N, Zhang ZT, Watts DC : Hygroscopic dimensional changes of self-adhering and new resin-matrix composites during water sorption/desorption cycles. Dent Mater, 27:259-266, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.015
  36. Wei YJ, Silikas N, Zhang ZT, Watts DC : Diffusion and concurrent solubility of self-adhering and new resin-matrix composites during water sorption/desorption cycles. Dent Mater, 27:197-205, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.014