Recently, the genus Lactobacillus was divided into several genera [1], with the species Lactobacillus fermentum being assigned to the genus Limosilactobacillus. Limosilactobacillus fermentum is one of heterofermentatives and is used in the fermentation of milk, plants, and silage. Limosilactobacillus fermentum strains not only enhance the nutritional value and flavor of food but also its functional properties. This species has strong pH tolerance and good bile tolerance, and it can also reduce cholesterol content in the human body [2]. In addition, L. fermentum can inhibit harmful intestinal microbiota, lessen the activity of food allergens, reduce mutagenic and carcinogenic activities, display immunomodulatory activity, and lower cholesterol [3,4]. Limosilactobacillus fermentum JNU532 was isolated from local fermented kimchi in this study. In our previous study, an L. fermentum JNU532–derived fermentation broth demonstrated antioxidant properties and the ability to reduce melanin production by inhibiting the activity of tyrosinase in B16F10 melanoma cells. Therefore, L. fermentum JNU532 may be considered a natural depigmentation agent. [5].
L. fermentum JNU532 was cultivated in Man-Rogosa-Sharpe (MRS) medium (Becton, Dickinson, Franklin, USA) for 24 h at 37℃. Genomic DNA was extracted with a HiGeneTM Genomic DNA Prep kit (BIOFACT, Daejeon, South Korea), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
The short-read sequencing library was prepared with an Illumina® DNA Prep kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Sequencing was performed on the Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina) using the Illumina MiSeq reagent kit V3 (300 bp, paired end). The long-read sequencing library was prepared using an Oxford Nanopore Ligation Sequencing Kit (Oxford Nanopore, Oxford, UK). Long-read sequencing was carried out on a MinION sequencing device (Oxford Nanopore) equipped with a MinION flow cell (R9.4.1, Oxford Nanopore). Illumina sequencing produced 1,244,607 paired end reads (433,289,083 bp), while 122,763 reads with an average length of 1,839 bases were obtained from Oxford Nanopore sequencing.
De novo genome sequence assembly was assembled performed using a Flye assembler (v. 2.9) [6] with default options. Adapter sequences from short reads were removed using TrimGalore (v. 0.6.7) [7] with the ‘paired’ parameter. Errors in the draft genome assembly were corrected with Pilon (v. 1.24) [8] with default parameters. Gene prediction of the chromosomal sequence was performed with Prokka (v. 1.14.5) [9]. The completeness of the genome assembly was assessed using BUSCO (v. 5.2.2) [10] with the OrthoDB v10 bacterial (bacteria_odb10) database.
The complete genome sequence of L. fermentum JNU532 consisted of one circular chromosome with a guanine + cytosine (GC) ratio of 51.5% (Table 1). A total of 2,113 genes, including 15 rRNA and 57 tRNA, were predicted in the genome (Fig. 1). The genomic information of L. fermentum JNU532 could provide insight to future research on the characteristics of this strain for functional food and feed supplements (Table 1).
Fig. 1. Circular chromosome map of Limosilactobacillus fermentum JNU532. From the periphery to the center, marked features are as follows: protein--coding sequences on the forward strand, protein--coding sequences on the reverse strand, tRNA, rRNA, GC ratio, and GC skew. bp, base pair; G, guanine; C, cytosine; tRNA, transfer RNA; rRNA, ribosomal RNA.
Table 1. Genome features of Limosilactobacillus fermentum JNU532
bp, base pair; G, guanine; C, cytosine; tRNA, transfer RNA; rRNA, ribosomal RNA.
DATA AVAILBILITY
The complete genome sequence has been deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) GenBank under the accession number GCA_024800585.1. The BioProject accession number is PRJNA872884 and the BioSample accession number is SAMN30472492.
References
- Zheng J, Wittouck S, Salvetti E, Franz CMAP, Harris HMB, Mattarelli P, et al. A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2020;70:2782-858. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004107
- Pan DD, Zeng XQ, Yan YT. Characterisation of Lactobacillus fermentum SM-7 isolated from koumiss, a potential probiotic bacterium with cholesterol-lowering effects. J Sci Food Agric. 2011;91:512-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4214
- Naghmouchi K, Belguesmia Y, Bendali F, Spano G, Seal BS, Drider D. Lactobacillus fermentum: a bacterial species with potential for food preservation and biomedical applications. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2020;60:3387-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2019.1688250
- Swain MR, Anandharaj M, Ray RC, Parveen Rani R. Fermented fruits and vegetables of Asia: a potential source of probiotics. Biotechnol Res Int. 2014;2014:250424. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/250424
- Meng Z, Oh S. Antioxidant and antimelanogenic activities of kimchi-derived Limosilactobacillus fermentum JNU532 in B16F10 melanoma cells. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021;31:990-8. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2104.04008
- Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner PA. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:540-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0072-8
- Krueger F, James F, Ewels P, Afyounian E, Schuster-Boeckler B. FelixKrueger/TrimGalore: v0.6.7 - DOI via Zenodo [Internet]. Zenodo. 2021 [cited 2022 Feb 23]. https://zenodo.org/record/5127899
- Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A, Sakthikumar S, et al. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLOS ONE. 2014;9:e112963. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112963
- Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2068-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153
- Manni M, Berkeley MR, Seppey M, Simao FA, Zdobnov EM. BUSCO update: novel and streamlined workflows along with broader and deeper phylogenetic coverage for scoring of eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and viral genomes. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38:4647-54. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab199