A Study on the Learning Modes of Start-up Accelerating Program: Focusing on Korean Accelerators in the ICT Field Targeting Global Market

액셀러레이터 보육 프로그램이 제공하는 학습방식에 관한 연구: 글로벌 지향 ICT 분야 액셀러레이터를 중심으로

  • Shin, Seung Yong (The Graduate School of Technology & Innovation Management, Hanyang University) ;
  • Lee, Jonghyun (The Graduate School of Pan-Pacific International Studies, Kyung Hee University)
  • 신승용 (한양대학교 기술경영전문대학원) ;
  • 이종현 (경희대학원 국제대학원)
  • Received : 2022.11.14
  • Accepted : 2023.02.21
  • Published : 2023.02.28

Abstract

This study classified and confirmed the learning modes about start-ups that are based on the accelerator's program which was focusing on the Korean accelerators in the ICT field targeting global market. Eight accelerator practitioners were interviewed who were in charge of operating programs for accelerators, qualitatively analyzing method of the interview was conducted. The interview results to identify various learning modes that accelerators provide to startups through programs. In order to identify and classify learning modes, the researcher reviewed various prior documents and using categories of experience accumulation, observation, experimentation, trial and error, and improvisation as a priori code for the qualitative analysis. The interview results were analyzed through a subject analysis. As the result of the study, the learning modes offered by the accelerator's programs to startups were confirmed, with two subcategories identified for each of the five categories: experiential, learning from others, experimental, trial and error, and improvisation. Given the limited research on accelerator programs and their main function, the main function of accelerators, this study identified the types of learning modes that offered by the accelerator's programs to startups from the perspective of learning. This study provides important insights into the types of learning modes that offered by the accelerator programs, which can help to improve our understanding of how accelerators support organizational learning for startups. Additionally, this information can be useful for startups considering in participating in the accelerator programs, as it can help them making informed decisions about their involvement.

본 연구는 액셀러레이터 보육 프로그램의 학습방식에 관하여 글로벌 지향 ICT 분야 액셀러레이터를 중심으로 스타트업에 제공하는 학습방식을 분류 및 확인하였다. 액셀러레이터 보육 프로그램 운영을 담당하는 액셀러레이터 실무자 8개 사의 인터뷰를 진행하고, 인터뷰 결과를 질적 분석하여 액셀러레이터가 보육 프로그램을 통해 스타트업에 제공하는 다양한 학습방식을 도출하여 시사점을 제공하였다. 학습방식을 확인 및 분류하기 위해 연구자가 다양한 선행문헌을 검토하여 사용이 적절하다고 판단한 경험축적, 관찰, 실험, 시행착오, 임기응변의 학습방식을 질적 분석의 a priori code로 활용하였고, 인터뷰 결과는 주제분석을 통해 분석하였다. 연구결과 액셀러레이터의 보육 프로그램이 스타트업에 제공하는 학습방식은 경험축적, 관찰, 시행착오, 실험, 임기응변 등 5개의 범주 별 각 2개, 총 10개의 하위범주를 도출하여 확인하였다. 본 연구는 액셀러레이터의 주요 기능인 보육 프로그램에 관한 연구가 부족한 상황에서 학습에 대한 관점에서 액셀러레이터의 보육 프로그램이 보육 스타트업에 어떤 학습방식을 제공하고 있는지에 대한 결과를 도출하였다. 이는 학문적 및 실무적으로 액셀러레이터의 보육 프로그램이 스타트업에 제공하는 학습방식에 대한 이해도를 높이고, 조직학습에 대한 관점에서 액셀러레이터의 보육 프로그램이 보육 스타트업에 어떤 학습방식을 제공하고 있는지에 대한 관점을 확대했다는 점에서 의의가 있다. 액셀러레이터는 보육 스타트업에 충분한 학 습방식을 제공할 수 있는 보육 프로그램 개선에 활용할 수 있으며, 보육 프로그램 참여를 고민하는 스타트업이라면 보육 프로그램 참여를 결정하는 데도 도움이 될 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Adler, P., & Clark, K. B.(1991). Behind the learning curve: A sketch of the learning process. Management Science, 37(3), 267-281. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.37.3.267
  2. Alhusen, H., Bennat, T., Bizer, K., Cantner, U., Kalthaus, M., Proeger, T., Sternberg, R., & Topfer, S.(2021). A new measurement conception for the 'doing-usinginteracting' mode of innovation. Research Policy, 50(4), 104214.
  3. Apanasovich, N.(2016). Modes of innovation: a grounded meta-analysis. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7(3), 720-737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-014-0237-0
  4. Argote, L.(2012). Organizational learning: Creating, retaining and transferring knowledge. Pennsylvania: USA, Springer Science & Business Media
  5. Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A.(1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Boston: USA, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
  6. Arrow, K. J.(1962). The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing. The Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155-173. https://doi.org/10.2307/2295952
  7. Bandura, A.(1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  8. Barkema, H. G., & Schijven, M.(2008). How do firms learn to make acquisitions? A review of past research and an agenda for the future. Journal of Management, 34(3), 594-634. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316968
  9. Beckman, C. M., & Haunschild, P. R.(2002). Network learning: The effects of partners' heterogeneity of experience on corporate acquisitions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(1), 92-124. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094892
  10. Bell, G. G., & Zaheer, A.(2007). Geography, networks, and knowledge flow. Organization Science, 18(6), 955-972. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0308
  11. Bingham, C. B., & Davis, J. P.(2012). Learning sequences: Their existence, effect and evolution. Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 611-641. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0331
  12. Bliemel, M., Flores, R., De Klerk, S., & Miles, M. P.(2019). Accelerators as start-up infrastructure for entrepreneurial clusters. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 31(1-2), 133-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2018.1537152
  13. Bontis, N., Crossan, M. M., & Hulland, J.(2002). Managing an organizational learning system by aligning stocks and flows. Journal of Management Studies, 39(4), 437-469. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.t01-1-00299
  14. Boyatzis, R. E.(1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks: USA, Sage Publications.
  15. Braun, V., & Victoria, C.(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  16. Bryman, A.(2008). Social research methods. 3rd Edition. New York: USA, Oxford University Press.
  17. Camuffo, A., Cordova, A., Gambardella, A., & Spina, C.(2020). A scientific approach to entrepreneurial decision making: Evidence from a randomized control trial. Management Science, 66(2), 564-586. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3249
  18. Cohen, S. L.(2013). How to accelerate learning: Entrepreneurial ventures participating in accelerator programs. Doctoral dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
  19. Cohen, S., Fehder, D. C., Hochberg, Y. V., & Murray, F.(2019). The design of startup accelerators. Research Policy, 48(7), 1781-1797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.003
  20. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A.(1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  21. Crabtree, B. F., Yanoshik, M. K., Miller, W. L., & O'Connor, P. J.(1993). Selecting Individual or Group Interviews. Thousand Oaks: USA, Sage Publications.
  22. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N.(2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks: USA. Sage Publications.
  23. Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E.(1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522-537. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1999.2202135
  24. Dahlander, L., & Gann, D. M.(2010). How open is innovation. Research Policy, 39(6), 699-709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.013
  25. Darr, E. D., Argote, L., & Epple, D.(1995). The acquisition, transfer, and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: Productivity in franchises. Management Science, 41(11), 1750-1762. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.41.11.1750
  26. de Jong, J. P. J., & Freel, M.(2010). Absorptive capacity and the reach of collaboration in high technology small firms. Research Policy, 39(1), 47-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.10.003
  27. Del Sarto, N., Cazares, C. C., & Di Minin, A.(2021). Startup accelerators as an open environment: The impact on startups' innovative performance. Technovation, 113, 102425.
  28. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W.(1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
  29. Do, T. T., & Mai, N. K.(2021). Organizational learning and firm performance: a systematic review. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(4), 1230-1253.
  30. Drori, I., & Wright, M.(2018). Accelerators: Characteristics, trends and the new entrepreneurial ecosystem. In Acceleratorss: Successful Venture Creation and Growth. London: UK. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  31. Drover, W., Busenitz, L., Matusik, S., Townsend, D., Anglin, A., & Dushnitsky, G.(2017). A review and road map of entrepreneurial equity financing research: Venture capital, corporate venture capital, angel investment, crowdfunding and accelerators. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1820-1853. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317690584
  32. Edmondson, A. C.(2003). Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1419-1452. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00386
  33. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A.(2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they?. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
  34. Fiol, C. M., & Lyles, M. A.(1985). Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 803-813. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1985.4279103
  35. Frith, H., & Gleeson, K.(2004). Clothing and Embodiment: Men Managing Body Image and Appearance. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 5(1), 40-48. https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.5.1.40
  36. Gonzalez-Uribe, J., & Leatherbee, M.(2018). The effects of business accelerators on venture performance: Evidence from start-up chile. The Review of Financial Studies, 31(4), 1566-1603. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhx103
  37. Greve, H. R.(2003). Organizational learning from performance feedback: A behavioral perspective on innovation and change. Cambridge: UK. Cambridge University Press.
  38. Grimaldi, M., Quinto, I., & Rippa, P.(2013). Enabling open innovation in small and medium enterprises: a dynamic capabilities approach. Knowledge and Process Management, 20(4), 199-210. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1423
  39. Hallen, B. L., Cohen, S. L., & Bingham, C. B.(2020). Do accelerators work? If so, how?. Organization Science, 31(2), 378-414. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019.1304
  40. Haunschild, P. R.(1993). Interorganizational imitation: The impact of interlocks on corporate acquisition activity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), 564-592. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393337
  41. Haunschild, P. R., & Miner, A. S.(1997). Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 472-500. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393735
  42. Hayward, M. L. A.(2002). When do firms learn from their acquisition experience? Evidence from 1990-1995. Strategic Management Journal, 23(1), 21-39. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.207
  43. Huber, G. P.(1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), 88-115. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.88
  44. Huggins, R., & Thompson, P.(2015). Entrepreneurship, innovation and regional growth: a network theory. Small business economics, 45(1), 103-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9643-3
  45. Ingram, P.(2017). Interorganizational learning. In The Blackwell Companion to Organizations. Hoboken: USA. Wiley-Blackwell.
  46. Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L.(2019). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Thousand Oaks: USA. Sage Publications.
  47. Jones, O., & Macpherson, A.(2006). Inter-organizational learning and strategic renewal in SMEs: extending the 4I framework. Long Range Planning, 39(2), 155-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2005.02.012
  48. Kane, T. J.(2010). The importance of startups in job creation and job destruction. Available at SSRN 1646934.
  49. Khanna, T., Gulati, R., & Nohria, N.(1998). The dynamics of learning alliances: competition, cooperation, and relative scope. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 193-210. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199803)19:3<193::AID-SMJ949>3.0.CO;2-C
  50. Kim, D. H.(1998). The link between individual and organizational learning. London: UK. In The strategic management of intellectual capital. Routledge.
  51. Kim, H. C., Kim, D. H., & Lee, J. H.(2022). Accelerators: Conceptualization and Future Research Direction. Korean Journal of Management, 30(3), 107-134.
  52. Kim, H. S., & Jang, S. K.(2015). A Worker-Owned Firm's Organizational Change from the Perspective of Organizational Learning: The case of Woojin Traffic. The Korean Journal of Cooperative Studies, 33(3), 33-61. https://doi.org/10.35412/kjcs.2015.33.3.003
  53. Kim, J. Y., & Miner, A. S.(2007). Vicarious learning from the failures and near-failures of others: Evidence from the U.S. commercial banking industry. Academy of Management Journal ARCHIVE, 50(3), 687-714. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.25529755
  54. Kim, K. R.(2022). The Effects of Organizational Leraning on Organizational Innovativeness and Organizational Performance: in the Small and Medium-sized Enterprises in Seoul and Kyunggi Area. Master's thesis. The University of Yonsei at Seoul.
  55. Kuzel, A. J.(1992). Sampling in qualitative inquiry. Thousand Oaks: USA. Sage Publications.
  56. Lapre, M. A., & Van Wassenhove, L. N.(2001). Creating and transferring knowledge for productivity improvement in factories. Management Science, 47(10), 1311-1325. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.10.1311.10264
  57. Lee, J. W.(2016). A leading role in the spread of entrepreneurship, Accelerator. Entrepreneurship Korea, 1, 7-10.
  58. Lee, S. D.(2003). The Effects of Organizational Culture on Organizational Learning Types. Korean Business Education Review, 29(1), 5-28.
  59. Lieberman, M. B.(1984). The learning curve and pricing in the chemical processing industries. The RAND Journal of Economics, 15(2), 213-228. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555676
  60. Miner, A. S., & Haunschild, P. R.(1995). Population-level learning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 17, 115-166.
  61. Miner, A. S., Bassoff, P., & Moorman, C.(2001). Organizational improvisation and learning: A field study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(2), 304-337. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667089
  62. Moorman, C., & Miner, A. S.(1998). Organizational improvisation and memory. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 698-723. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1998.1255634
  63. Nonaka, I.(1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
  64. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H.(1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford: UK. Oxford University Press.
  65. Oh, S. Y.(2019). Effects of organizational learning on performance: the moderating roles of trust in leaders and organizational justice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(2), 313-331. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-02-2018-0087
  66. Pisano, G. P.(1994). Knowledge, integration, and the locus of learning: An empirical analysis of process development. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S1), 85-100. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150907
  67. Ra, K. H., Yang, D, K., & Battulg, A.(2019). Understanding the Effects of Accelerators on Startups: A Network-Based Approach. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 14(1). 85-99. https://doi.org/10.16972/APJBVE.14.1.201902.85
  68. Rapping, L.(1965). Learning and World War II production functions. Review of Economics and Statistics, 47(1), 81-86. https://doi.org/10.2307/1924126
  69. Real, J. C., Roldan, J. L., & Leal, A.(2014). From entrepreneurial orientation and learning orientation to business performance: analysing the mediating role of organizational learning and the moderating effects of organizational size. British Journal of Management, 25(2), 186-208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00848.x
  70. Ries, E.(2011). The lean startup: How today's entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. New York: USA. Crown.
  71. Rosenberg, N., & Nathan, R.(1982). Inside the black box: technology and economics. Cambridge: UK. Cambridge University Press.
  72. Roundy, P. T.(2017). Hybrid organizations and the logics of entrepreneurial ecosystems. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(4), 1221-1237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-017-0452-9
  73. Senge, P. M.(1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: USA. Doubleday.
  74. Shin, S. Y.(2022). A study on the effect of accelerator programs on learning and performance of startups. Doctoral dissertation. The University of Hanyang at Seoul.
  75. Shin, S. Y., & Kwon, G. H.(2020). Analysis of Domestic Accelerators: Focusing on Their Programs, Processes, and Early Performances of Accelerating Start-ups. Journal of the Korean Entrepreneurship Socieity, 15(1), 91-107. https://doi.org/10.24878/TKES.2020.15.1.91
  76. Shin, S. Y., & Lee, J. H.(2022). A Study on Contents and Characteristics of the Accelerator's Program: Focusing on the Korean Accelerators in the ICT Field Targeting Global Market. Journal of the Korean Entrepreneurship Socieity, 17(6), 113-148. https://doi.org/10.24878/TKES.2022.17.6.113
  77. Sitkin, S. B.(1992). Learning through failure: The strategy of small losses. Research in Organizational Behavior, 14, 231-231.
  78. Startup Genome(2022). Global Startup Ecosystem Report. Retrieved(2022.11.14.) from https://startupgenome.com/report/gser2022.
  79. Taylor, B. C., & Trujillo, N.(2001). The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods. Thousand Oaks: USA, Sage Publications.
  80. Terwiesch, C., & Bohn, R. E.(2001). Learning and process improvement during production ramp-up. International Journal of Production Economics, 70(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(00)00045-1
  81. Thompson, P.(2010). Learning by Doing. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation. Amsterdam: Netherlands, Elsevier.
  82. Van de Ven, A., & Polley, D.(1992). Learning while innovating. Organization Science, 3(1), 92-116. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.1.92
  83. Wong, P. K., Ho, Y. P., & Autio, E.(2005). Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth: Evidence from GEM data. Small business economics, 24, 335-350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-2000-1
  84. Zahra, S. A., & George, G.(2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203. https://doi.org/10.2307/4134351