Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship (벤처창업연구)

The Korean Society of Business Venturing (한국벤처창업학회)
권호 표지

An Exploratory Study on the Strategic Responses to ESG Evaluation of SMEs

중소기업의 ESG평가에 대한 전략적 대응방안 탐색적 연구

  • 박윤수 (군산대학교 융합기술창업학과)
  • Received : 2022.12.23
  • Accepted : 2023.02.22
  • Published : 2023.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

As stakeholder demands and sustainable finance grow, ESG management and ESG evaluation are becoming important. SMEs should also prepare for the trends of ESG rating practices that affects supply chain management and financial transactions. However, SMEs have no choice but to focus on survival first, so there are restrictions on putting into ESG management. In addition, there is a lack of research on the legitimacy of ESG management by SMEs, and volatility in ESG evaluation systems and rating grades is also increasing. Accordingly, it is necessary to review ESG evaluation trends and practical guidelines along with the review of previous studies. As a result of the exploratory study, SMEs need to implement ESG management and make efforts to specialize in ESG related new businesses under conditions in which their survival base is guaranteed in terms of implementation strategies. In addition, it is necessary to focus on the strategic use of various evaluation results along with accumulating information favorable for ESG evaluation through organizational learning and software management. The implications of this study are that various studies such as the classification criteria for SMEs and the relationship between ESG evaluation grades and long-term survival rates are needed in ESG evaluation of SMEs. At the government policy level, it is time to consider the ESG evaluation system exclusively for SMEs so that ESG management can be implemented and ESG evaluation at different levels by industry and size.

이해관계자 요구와 지속가능금융 성장에 따라 ESG경영과 이를 반영한 ESG평가 대응이 중요해지고 있다. 중소기업 또한 공급망 관리와 금융거래에 영향을 주는 ESG평가 규범화 흐름에 대비해야 한다. 그러나 중소기업은 생존에 우선 집중할 수밖에 없어 ESG경영 도입에 제약이 따른다. 또한 중소기업의 ESG경영 당위성에 대한 연구가 부족하고 ESG 평가체계 및 평가등급의 변동성 또한 높아지고 있다. 이에 따라 선행연구 고찰과 함께 ESG 평가동향 및 실무지침서의 비판적 검토가 필요하다. 탐색적 연구 결과, 중소기업은 실행전략 차원에서 생존기반이 담보되는 여건 하에 ESG경영을 도입하고 ESG창업에 특화하는 노력이 필요하다. 또한 조직적 학습과 소프트웨어 관리로 ESG평가에 유리한 정보 축적과 함께 다양한 평가결과의 전략적 활용에 중점을 둘 필요가 있다. 본 연구의 시사점은 중소기업의 ESG평가에 있어 중소기업에 대한 분류기준과 ESG 평가등급과 장기 생존률과의 관계 연구 등 다양한 연구가 필요하다는 점이다. 정부정책 차원에서도 생존 가능성과 함께 업종과 규모별로 상이한 수준의 ESG경영 도입 및 ESG평가가 이루어지도록 중소기업 전용 ESG 평가제도의 검토가 필요한 시점이다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 군산대학교 교내연구비 지원에 의해 이루어짐

References

  1. Abrahamson, E., & Fairchild, G.(1996). Management fashion: Lifecycles, Triggers, and Collective learning Process. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 708-740. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667053
  2. Ballestar, M. T., Cuerdo-Mir, M., & Freire-Rubio, M. T.(2020). The Concept of Sustainability on Social Media: A Social Listening Approach. Sustainability, 12(5), 1-19.
  3. Berg, F., Kolbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R.(2022). Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings. Review of Finance, 2022, 1-30.
  4. Christensen, M. T., Serafeim G., & Sikochi, A.(2021). Why is Corporate Virtue in the Eye of The Beholder? The Case of ESG Ratings. The Accounting Review, 97 (1), 147-175. https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-2019-0506
  5. Choi, D. H.(2021). Current status and future prospects of ESG management, focusing on ESG management in Korea. Japan and China. Regional Industry Research, 44(4), 263-291. https://doi.org/10.33932/rir.44.4.13
  6. Ciegis, R., Ramanauskiene, J., & Martinkus, B.(2009). The Concept of Sustainable Development and its Use for Sustainability Scenarios. Engineering Economics, 2(62), 28-37.
  7. Costa, A. J., Curi, D., Bandeira, A. M., Ferreira, A., Tome B., Joaquim, C., Santos, C., Cristina, G., Meira, D., Azevedo, G., Inacio H., Jesus, M., Teixeira, M. T., Monteiro, P., Duarte, R., & Marques, R. P.(2022). Literature Review and Theoretical Framework of the Evolution and Interconnectedness of Corporate Sustainability Constructs. Sustainability, 14(8), 4413.
  8. Diez-Canamero, B., Bishara T., Otegi-Olaso, J. R., Minguez, R., & Fernandez, J. M.(2020). Measurement of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Corporate Sustainability Indexes, Rankings and Ratings. Sustainability, 12(5), 2153.
  9. Drempetic, S., Klein, C., & Zwergel, B.(2019). The Influence of Firm Size on the ESG Score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings Under Review. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(2), 333-360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04164-1
  10. Hwang, J. S., & Im, J. O.(2016). The Effect of Shared Growth between Large and Small Business on Corporate Social Responsibility and Managers' Accounting Ethics. Industrial Economics Study, 29(1), 435-454.
  11. Im, H. J.(2021). Analysis on ESG Issues of SMEs Using Text Mining. Humanities and Social Sciences 21, 12(4), 469-482.
  12. Im, W. B.(2019). The effect of non-financial information on corporate performance: Focusing on ESG score. International Accounting Studies, 86, 119-144.
  13. Im, T. B.(2009). Qualitative Methodology: Approach and Application. Journal of Governmental Studie, 15(1), 155-187.
  14. Ji, S. H.(2019). The Quality of Accounting Income of Sustainability Management Corporate. Korea International Accounting Review, 86, 235-258.
  15. Jebe, R.(2019). The Convergence of Financial and ESG Materiality: Taking Sustainability Mainstream. American Business Law Journal, 56(3), 645-702. https://doi.org/10.1111/ablj.12148
  16. Jeon, J. Q.(2020). ESG factors as a determinant of credit ratings. Korea Finance Association Autumn Academic, 238-263.
  17. Jeon, J. Q.(2022). Empirical Study on ESG and Investment Efficiency. Review of Financial Information Studies, 11(1), 33-52. https://doi.org/10.35214/RFIS.11.1.202202.002
  18. Financial Supervisory Service(2023). Regulation of ESG Bond Certification Evaluation Guidelines. Retrieved from https://www.fss.or.kr/fss/bbs/B0000188/view.do?nttId=57878&menuNo=200218&cl1Cd=&sdate=&edate=&searchCnd=1&searchWrd=%EC%9D%B8%EC%A6%9D%ED%8F%89%EA%B0%80&pageIndex=1.
  19. Financial Services Commission(2018). Corporate governance disclosure is mandatory in phases from 2019. Retrieved from https://www.fsc.go.kr/no010101/73071?srchCtgry=&curPage=&srchKey=sj&srchText=%EC%A7%80%EB%B0%B0%EA%B5%AC%EC%A1%B0&srchBeginDt=2018-02-01&srchEndDt=.
  20. Financial Services Commission(2021a). We will promote measures to improve the corporate disclosure system to reduce the burden on companies and strengthen investor protectio. Retrieved from https://www.fsc.go.kr/no010101/75176?srchCtgry=&curPage=2&srchKey=all&srchText=%EA%B3%B5%EC%8B%9C&srchBeginDt=2021-01-01&srchEndDt=2021-02-27.
  21. Financial Services Commission(2021b). ESG International Trends and Domestic Implications. Retrieved from https://www.fsc.go.kr/no010101?srchCtgry=&srchBeginDt=2021-02-01&srchEndDt=2021-02-27&srchKey=all&srchText=ESG+.
  22. Financial Services Commission(2021c). Designated 3 innovative financial services. Retrieved from https://www.fsc.go.kr/no010101/75978?srchCtgry=&curPage=2&srchKey=sj&srchText=%ED%98%81%EC%8B%A0%EA%B8%88%EC%9C%B5%EC%84%9C%EB%B9%84%EC%8A%A4&srchBeginDt=&srchEndDt=.
  23. Financial Services Commission(2021d). SASB-based Korean translation to prepare companies for standardization of sustainability disclosure. Retrieved from https://www.fsc.go.kr/no010101/76848?srchCtgry=&curPage=2&srchKey=all&srchText=%EA%B8%B0%EC%97%85&srchBeginDt=2021-11-10&srchEndDt=2021-11-30.
  24. Kang, H. G., & Jang, G. H.(2021). Why ESG Integration Strategy Needs AI. Retrieved from https://dbr.donga.com/article/view/1203/article_no/10121/ac/magazine.
  25. Kang, W., & Jung, M. K.(2020). Effect of ESG Activities and Firm's Financial Characteristics. Korean Journal of Financial Studies, 49(5), 681-707. https://doi.org/10.26845/KJFS.2020.10.49.5.681
  26. Kim, D. S., Lim, B. H., & Lee, K. H.(2017). The relationship between managerial compensation and corporate performance according to the governance structure of KOSDAQ SMEs. Korean Entrepreneurship Association, 12(3), 27-56.
  27. Kim, H. J., & Lee, J. S.(2022). A study on the gap between ESG implementation and evaluation: focusing on the ESG performance indicators. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 35(4), 199-225.
  28. Kim, H. K., Lee, H. J., & Moon, Y. J.(2003). Reconsideration of Research Methods in Management Research in Korea: A Study Qualitative Research Methodology. Management Education Review, 6(2), 47-66.
  29. Kim, J. H.(2020). A Study on the Effect of Characteristics by Size of a Company on the Critical Point Inducing Nonlinear Relationship Between Social Responsibility and Corporate Value. Asia Pacific Business Research, 11(2), 207-233.
  30. Kim, K. O.(2018). Relationship between Characteristics of Ownership Structure and Corporate Social Responsibility(CSR). Korea Business Review, 33(2), 171-193.
  31. Kim, Y. M., & Park, J. H.(2021). ESG or Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Financial Performance: An Empirical Study and Future Directions. Strategic Management Research, 24(2), 75-114.
  32. Kim, Y. K.(2020). Effects of Non-financial Information Disclosure on Firm Performance and Firm Value. Journal of Regulation Studies, 29(1), 35-59. https://doi.org/10.22954/KSRS.2020.29.1.002
  33. Korea Chamber of Commerce and Industry(2021). Improvement of Governance Structure for Transparent Management of Small and Medium Businesses. Retrieved from http://www.korcham.net/FileWebKorcham/OnlineSeminar/File/중소중견기업의%20투명경영을%20위한%20지배구조%20개선_윤진수.pdf.
  34. Korea Exchange(2021). Korea Exchange. Retrieved from https://esg.krx.co.kr.
  35. Korea Federation of SMEs(2021a). Investigation of SME management status and 2022 management plan. Retrieved from https://www.kbiz.or.kr/ko/contents/bbs/view.do?seq=151269&mnSeq=207&schFld=whle&schTxt=2022%EB%85%84+%EA%B2%BD%EC%98%81%EA%B3%84%ED%9A%8D+%EC%A1%B0%EC%82%AC.
  36. Korea Federation of SMEs(2021b). ESG Difficulties in Small and Medium Businesses. Retrieved from https://www.kbiz.or.kr/ko/contents/bbs/view.do?seq=150863&pg=6&pgSz=9&mnSeq=207&schFld=whle&schTxt=ESG.
  37. Korea Institute Of Corporate Governance and Sustainability(2022). 2022 ESG Ratings, Retrieved from http://cgs.or.kr/news/press_view.jsp?pp=6&skey=&svalue=&pg=1&no=201.
  38. Kwak, B. S., & Lee, J. H.(2019). Analysis of social responsibility research trends in domestic SMEs and suggestions for future research directions. Strategic Management Research, 22(3), 21-50.
  39. Li, H., Zhang, X., & Zhao, Y.(2022). ESG and Firm's Default Risk. Finance Research Letters, 47, 1-11.
  40. Lee, I. H.(2021). Analysis of ESG Evaluation System Status and Characteristics. Korea Capital Market Institute, Issue Report 21-09, 1-23.
  41. Lee, I. H., & Kim, J. Y.(2010). Mindfulness' interaction effect of the Influence of Entrepreneur's Leadership of Venture Firm. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 11(5), 1881-1890. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2010.11.5.1881
  42. Lee, J. G., & Lee, J. H.(2020). Current status and development direction of "Sustainable Management" research: Focusing on ESG evaluation indicators. Strategic Management Research, 23(2), 65-92.
  43. Lee, M. S., & Kim, Y.(2015). An Empirical Study on the Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility Activity on Firm Value: Comparative Analysis on Integrated Index(ESG and KEJI). The Journal of Business Education, 29(6), 345-374.
  44. Lee, Y. W.(2022). Analysis of Issues and Application Points of the Korean ESG Guidelines. Auditor Journal, 266, 14-18,
  45. Lee, S. B., Boo, J. M., & Kim, S. C.(2016). A Study on the Effect of Project Managers' Leadership on Participants' Individual Competency and Project Performance. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 11(5), 175-188.
  46. NICE Information Service(2022). Corporate CB, Retrieved from http://www.niceinfo.co.kr/business/eCredit.nice.
  47. NICE Ratings Service(2022). Current rating methodology. Retrieved from https://www.nicerating.com/disclosure/currentAssessment.do.
  48. Min, J. H., Kim, B. S., & Ha, S, I.(2014). The Impact of Firms' Environmental, Social, and Governancial Factors for Sustainability on Their Stock Returns and Values. Korean Management Science Review International Journal of Management Science, 39(4), 33-49.
  49. Min, J. H., Kim, B. S., & Ha, S, I.(2015). The Relationship between Firms' Environmental, Social, Governance Factors and Their Financial Performance: An Empirical Rationale for Creating Shared Value. Korean Management Science Review, 32(1), 113-131.
  50. Min, J. H., & Kim, B. S.(2019). Is ESG effort a normative proposition for sustainability? An analysis of different effects of firms' ESG efforts by their respective financial status. Korean Management Science Review, 36(1), 17-35. https://doi.org/10.7737/kmsr.2019.36.1.017
  51. Oh, D. K., Lee, K. H., Shin, B. C., & Lee, E. Y.(2013). An empirical analysis of the introduction and implementation of social responsibility management in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Korean Productivity Review, 27(1), 385-418. https://doi.org/10.15843/kpapr.27.1.201303.385
  52. Oh, G. H., Yoon, P. K., & Kang, S. M.(2012). The Effects of Ethical Management to Firm Value and Financial Performances in Korea. Journal of Knowledge Studies, 10(3), 3-27.
  53. Oh, S. H., & Lee, S. T.(2019). A Study on the Relationship between ESG Evaluation Factors and Corporate Value. Korean Computers and Accounting Review, 17(2), 205-223.
  54. Oh, S. H.(2021). A Study on the Effect of Agency Rating and ESG Rating on Corporate Value. Tax Accounting Research, 69(0), 125-144.
  55. Park, J. H., Han, H. W., & Kim, N. R.(2022). Exploring domestic ESG research trends: focusing on domestic research on ESG from 2012 to 2021. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 17(1), 191-211.
  56. Park, J. R., & Kim, Y. H.(2017). The Empirical Study of Capital Cost on Corporate Governance: Evidence from Korean Firms. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business & Commerce, 9(2), 69-82. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-05-2016-0052
  57. Park, S. A., & Shin, E. H.(2021). Analysis of the Relationship between ESG Performance and Corporate Financial Values Focusing on SMEs. Journal of Environmental Policy and Administration, 29(4), 151-199. https://doi.org/10.15301/jepa.2021.29.4.151
  58. Salas-Zapata, W. A., & Ortiz-Munoz, S. M.(2017). Analysis of meanings of the concept of sustainability. Sustainable Development, 27(1), 153-161. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1885
  59. Son, H. C., & Park, S. K(2015). The Influence of the Owner's Management Participation Level on Earnings Management. Korean Journal of Management Accounting Research, 16(2), 107-137.
  60. Tsaples, G., & Papathanasiou, J.(2021). Data envelopment analysis and the concept of sustainability: A review and analysis of the literature. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 138(C). 1-9.
  61. Tae, J. R.(2021). A Study on ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) and Tax System. Tax Research, 21(2), 135-164.
  62. Xiang, D., Zhao, T., & Zhang, N.(2021). How can government environmental policy affect the performance of SMEs: Chinese evidence. Journal of cleaner production, 336.
  63. Yu, S. M., & Jung, H. A.(2016). Impact of Corporate Sustainable Management Information on Cost of Equity. The Journal of Internet Electronic Commerce Research, 16(6), 37-57.